+1000 Nobody is forcing them to pay $80k per year. Yes, there are Plenty of great schools that will be affordable (30-40k). Search them out—including privates that give merit. Nobody is stopping you from getting a great education. If you really desire a t20 and get in, if your etc is 500k, you can choose to pay the 80k. If not go to a t80 school with merit. Just because you “worked hard” does not entitle you to a t20 education—majority who apply do not win the lottery. |
Find something affordable to you. Just like I don’t buy cars I can’t afford (no driving a fancy bmw if I can’t afford it—get the Honda for 30k less), I don’t send my kids to schools we can’t afford. It’s about choices. And yes, Tgere are PLENTY of schools that are affordable—just not t20-30. So stop whining and focus on getting an affordable to you education. If you wanted your kids to attend 80k schools you gotta save. If you choose not to do that then you find ones that you can afford |
If you have twins you have 18 years to plan for two in college . And to get in the mindset of state school or merit searching or both. |
You aren’t doing sh*t except contorting yourself into some sort of victim. The school is making the decision to fund students with THEIR money. Stop being a pathetic whiner. |
That seems about right? They expect you are able to pay about 40% of your income + 5% of your assets each year. Whether you WANT to pay that much is a different story. And you aren't expected to pay 40% of your income each year - they assume at that level of income you had the ability to save more than someone earning just $45,000/year. |
It's 45% of income over $35,000. There's an EFC formula; it's quite complicated but it is all public knowledge https://fsapartners.ed.gov/sites/default/files/2021-08/2223EFCFormulaGuide.pdf |
DCUM seems to think the formula should be “what would a UMC family be able to pay without any lifestyle adjustments.” In reality it’s more of a “what would be possible if it were really really important to you” situation. Making personal sacrifices for your children isn’t for everyone. But don’t get mad that you are being forced to be honest with yourself about it. |
You shouldn’t consider ROI— that statement is the equivalent of “let them eat cake.” Telling us ridiculous proletariat folks that we should just study philosophy and literature and not worry about how we are going to pay the bills. No one thinks that. I work at a university and we have long conversations about ROI. |
Technically yes, we could as we live in a shack we paid off to make sure it was paid off before college but we also live way under our means in a way OP would not do. That's the difference. We aren't going on vacations, we aren't living in a big or expensive house. We DIY our own house repairs or they don't get done, etc. The only splurge is on kids activities. |
| I vaguely recall that FAFSA is supposed to be changed in 2023 or 2024 in such a way that there will no longer be a discount for having more than one child in college during a given year. Is that still the plan? |
My son, now a senior, plays a Division 1 sport at a private university and has had a 35% athletic scholarship for all 4 years. We would have otherwise been full pay; no way we would have qualified for any kind of need-based aid. Nevertheless, we had to complete FAFSA all 4 years as a requirement by the school, in order for them to apply the athletic scholarship. I have dutifully done it. They apply the athletic scholarship, and we pay the balance. |
+1 |
Oh FFS. We're all working hard, sweetheart. |
|
This is a perfect summation. |