That's the old Harvard. In the new Harvard it signals you're wealthy or connected or the token minority. |
Ah, the embittered tears of the rejected. Sweet, sweet nectar. Nice coping mechanism |
DP and Double Harvard grad here. No, it’s true. Legacies or minorities.everyone knows this |
Actually I didn't even apply there, going instead to an arguably same/ better school in the West Coast. |
It signals that you couldn't hack it at MIT. |
Yup |
+1 |
Why is the west coast any different? You have more wannabe-scholar meatheads there. |
True, but CA voted against racial discrimination decades ago. It has made a difference in protecting merit and academics. |
Oh, PP is talking public unis, not private. There's no public that rivals ivies at the undergraduate level. |
I think of the 2022-2023 Editor in Chief of Harvard’s newspaper. She is from an extremely wealthy, powerful family in South America. But she’s the first Latina to be editor in chief! |
Meh, Columbia just named an Egyptian-American woman as its president. We aren't talking a student newspaper here. She maybe the first African-American to head a world-class institution. |
Yeah sure. Did your boyfriend from Canada join you there too? |
Most of the students I know are in this cohort. And none of them are setting the world on fire if I'm being 100% honest. |
|
No, it's an amazing school.
And it's funny that people think it's become less meritocratic--it's quite the opposite (same as most other elite schools). Used to be (1950s-60s and earlier) if you were a reasonably well-off, high achieving student you could assume you could get in. Add in legacy and you were golden. There just wasn't that much competition. Opening it up to diversity increased the pool and increased the competition. Just look at accomplishments over time and the acceptance rate. (Same story at many elite institutions). This has been a steady rise to this point. |