Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think DC is pretty attractive to young professionals. However, one area where it is lacking is in the creative field. DC has a lot of interesting stuff, but much of it is more middle of the road or even stodgy. A little more edge culturally would probably be attractive to a lot of younger people--that is something that draws people to NYC and other cities.
Not picking on this poster in particular but for god's sake none of you all seem to know a thing about DC or people under 60.
I am under 60 and have lived in several cities that are generally viewed as attractive to young people, including the Bay Area, Austin and Berlin. I am also very familiar with other cities. Based on that experience, it is very clear to me that DC is not cutting edge culturally. Yes, it is better than when I moved here. No doubt about that. But there is a lot of room for improvement.
No, no, no. You are a Boomer that doesn’t know what you’re talking about. DC is a vibrant and cutting edge that’s an amazing place for arts. So many venues for bands and new music. So many studios and small theatre productions. The only way you can miss it is if you are a Boomer.
I am not a Boomer, and this is just not true. I agree with the person above who noted that past iterations of DC have had important cultural impacts. Dischord Records and associated acts really did have reach. GoGo is fine, though I think it is overrated. More interesting is that Gil Scott Heron lived here, and Roberta Flack got her start on the Hill. Marvin Gaye was born in SW DC. DC also had many other notable musical acts associated with it. All of that is great, but in my view, there is nothing similar happening at the moment.
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}