| Too many of y’all are bitter af. Get some happiness in your life |
wow |
lmaoooo so true!!!! |
This. Totally agree. Nobody is being forced to accumulate hundreds of thousands of debt, it's a choice. |
| Your monthly payment will not be lower! The 10K cancelling will lower the term. |
This. Million dollar football stadiums, gilded facilities for faculty, and all that administrative bloat. It's madness. Even though we've been saving for college like crazy for our two young kids, we are dread the day when a college.loan officer looks at our family finances so they can fleece us for everything we got. It's robbery. |
Yep. Students should only be allowed to borrow the max in a student loan. If their parents want to be stupid and take out private loans in their own name, that's on them. |
Well, gee. It's not like the Government doesn't ever cancel loans, right? Would you rather they just do it for the very rich?
|
A student loan that a person can't afford to pay off themselves is by definition something that does not even benefit the person holding the debt to a sufficient degree, much less others. |
No one is forcing anyone to pay the tuition at a school with million dollar stadiums. I hate that behavior as much as the next guy but it's still their decision to make. Schools should have the freedom to make investments how they see fit, even if I don't agree with those investments. |
It's bad no matter who does it. It's a terrible way of doing things. |
+1000. Took out loans and repaid them. Paid off spouse’s loans as well. Guess it was a mistake to live frugally enough to honor our obligations. |
Colleges charge whatever they want BECAUSE OF THE DAMN GOVT. How do people not get this through their damn thick skulls? Govt caused the problem in the first place, now the solution is more govt? Colleges could have never started raising tuition to whatever they want if access to credit by students were a lot more difficult. For years the federal govt backstopped student loans, so if the borrower defaulted, lender still got paid. The university already got theirs too. As always, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Liberals demanded we have college access for all, and what the ended up creating was the monstrousity of a debt trap we have today for students. The constant pumping of liquidity into the credit market for student loans and the removal of risk, all courtesy of the govt, is the reason why tuitions have exploded. Colleges can raise to whatever they want because they know students can always get a loan. Lenders keep handing out loans because they know they'll always get their money back. Where's the risk? Break the chain of easy credit and all of it implodes and free market economics takes over where prices will settle down only to what people can afford and what lenders will hand out. Get rid of all of the govt intervention in the market they caused the problem in the first place. |
Agree. Easy money policies caused the real estate bust about 14 years ago (which lasted for about 5 years), and easy money not subject to discharge in bankruptcy has enabled the business of higher education to fund constantly increasing tuition, fees, room & board, and books. Unfortunately, individuals and families who needed to borrow funds to attend college are simply not wealthy or entitled enough to justify relief from the federal government. |
I would be ok with wiping out accumulated interest over some reasonable amount but think the policy is misguided for multiple reasons including lack of efficacy on a macro or microeconomic level, equity (slap in the face to savers and those who never went to college because it was unaffordable) and moral hazard (and yeah, I know we bailed out the banks — that was dumb too, so why should we do another dumb thing?) It isn’t enough to make me vote for Republicans— not by a long stretch — but it’s not my favorite cause of progressives. Abolishing usury, on the other hand — I am ok with that. |