Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where did all the trumpers go? Don’t you want to defend stealing the nations nuclear secrets?

Waiting to see what the spin on that is going to be.

This is going to be tricky to spin. I don’t see how anyone can justify selling our nuclear prowess. This is not remotely connected to owning the libs. It’s treason.

Trump already started it days ago, saying the evidence was PLANTED. It's going to be the main right wing talking point.

Just like Trump paved the way before the 2020 election, saying that if he didn't win outright, it would mean the election had been stolen.

Same old playbook, every time.

But oh Lordy, the FBI has tapes.

But can't show the documents because top top top secret. And can't list them on the warrant, or in the affidavit. Only 'sources familiar with the investigation' can leak it to the WaPo and NYT

Just Wapo, and boy is the NYT and Maggie Haberman green with envy. CNN waited a bit then went ahead of published headlines citing the WaPo. NYT hates this and is trying to add more info so they have their own article.

They missed the mystery sources. Such a shame, that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo article also says the information the FBI was retrieving included signals intelligence and intimated it was related to Iran (at least, the article specified that when Trump was in office his aids often mishandled intelligence related to Iran insofar as it was ended up in the hands of staffers who did not have the security level to see it).

So what's going on here? Was he taking stuff to try to turn over to Middle Eastern countries like KSA, UAE, and Israel, where he might have financial gain?

It was just revealed the Iran was plotting to assassinate Bolton.

It was also revealed that the plotting has been known about for awhile, that Trump removed Bolton's security detail despite knowing of the plot, and that Biden restored the security detail and busted up the plot.

There was a thread a while ago about the large security presence in bethesda and someone pointed out it was at bolton’s house and there was some questions about why a former official needed that…..

[Anonymous]

If the Saudis are stupid enough to buy secrets from TFG and think they wouldn’t be caught, well geez. They’re not that dumb. But TFG might be dumb enough to try it? Or think about trying it? Or talk out loud about thinking about trying it?

Miralaxo is not exactly not full of spies. That place is probably surveilled in more ways by more people than any other place in the country.

Anyway. Too much speculation at this point. One thing is clear. Garland got the goods. No way is he out there today if he didn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who is familiar with this sort of thing know if this is correct?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anyone who is familiar with this sort of thing know if this is correct? [/quote


Yes. Correct. The president cannot declassify nuclear secrets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dumb question:

How did seizing the physical documents help our safety? Could he or staff have just taken photos, copied on an old fashioned copier, and kept copies?

I’m so confused why everyone is fixiared on these boxes when we all know that it’s digital files that really matter.

[Anonymous]

I laughed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dumb question:

How did seizing the physical documents help our safety? Could he or staff have just taken photos, copied on an old fashioned copier, and kept copies?

I’m so confused why everyone is fixiared on these boxes when we all know that it’s digital files that really matter.

They obviously didn’t know about them until now. They were kept back, intentionally. That’s my explanation, and obviously that would be a serious crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I laughed.

Are you 12?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dumb question:

How did seizing the physical documents help our safety? Could he or staff have just taken photos, copied on an old fashioned copier, and kept copies?

I’m so confused why everyone is fixiared on these boxes when we all know that it’s digital files that really matter.

And what should the penalty be for the Fat Boy who stole the docs and stored them unsecured at his crib? The death penalty?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dumb question:

How did seizing the physical documents help our safety? Could he or staff have just taken photos, copied on an old fashioned copier, and kept copies?

I’m so confused why everyone is fixiared on these boxes when we all know that it’s digital files that really matter.

Dumb take. Nobody knew what Trump was taking because there were no institutional controls. He would tell aides to bring documents directly to his private residence. He would put materials in a box and direct someone to bring it to his private office. He then repacked documents for shipment to a Florida without telling anyone what he was doing. Someone has to figure out what was missing and then attempt to ascertain whether it was destroyed, flushed, eaten or just lost. Archivists were busy taping documents back together for chrissakes. And nitwits like this expect some orderly process to put Humpty Dumpty together again?

[Anonymous]

If he tried to sell or otherwise distribute them, it would be treason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I laughed.

Are you 12?

Just a simpleton who enjoys the casual racism of Daily Caller and owning the libs.

[Anonymous]

Such a fuss over a few measly papers. Haven't you ever taken home a pen from the office?

He probably needed some scrap paper to pack Malaria's shoes, is all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dumb question:

How did seizing the physical documents help our safety? Could he or staff have just taken photos, copied on an old fashioned copier, and kept copies?

I’m so confused why everyone is fixiared on these boxes when we all know that it’s digital files that really matter.

And what should the penalty be for the Fat Boy who stole the docs and stored them unsecured at his crib? The death penalty?

Hey, they (we) executed Ethel Rosenberg for much less