Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's about power. The power to control. It's an attack on individualism. The decision takes power from individual people and gives it to legislatures. It's an attack on the fundamental idea of America. The underlying change is to the meaning of the word people which now exclusively means people's representatives. It's an attack on limited government.

The fundamental idea of America is not individuals with unlimited rights - it's a social contract where individuals balance their rights with those of others through an elected government.

The fundamental idea is that power rests inherently with the people not the government. The people grant government limited powers. Not governments granting people limited rights.

It’s shocking how many people in this country don’t understand this.

[Anonymous]

Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!

Different strokes for different folks.

You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.

We all win.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

Isn't TN last in the country in education?

Nashville is booming and TN is one of the fastest growing states at the moment.

I went to Nashville five years apart. The destruction done by Dems in charge ignoring the laws was unreal. Place went from clean to homeless on every bench. I was assaulted a couple times by them just walking down the street, because their aggression is ignored by Dem legislature. I still love Nashville but I’m always amazed at how fast things can be trashed in the name of compassion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!

Different strokes for different folks.

You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.

We all win.

Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

My two children exist because I was able to abort the pregnancy that would have killed me. You think my two living, breathing children should not exist and that I should be dead?

Yeah, you can burn in hell too.

+1. I know of many cases like this.

If that PP is the same, her story changed. Before this, she stated her pregnancies were unwanted. In the case above, she could have aborted in South Dakota and even Mississippi, because there is a clause that allows abortion to protect the life of the mother. I’m not the PP, but if she indeed ended two pregnancies because they would have killed her, she was right to do so and still could, even in deep red Mississippi

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

Isn't TN last in the country in education?

Nashville is booming and TN is one of the fastest growing states at the moment.

I went to Nashville five years apart. The destruction done by Dems in charge ignoring the laws was unreal. Place went from clean to homeless on every bench. I was assaulted a couple times by them just walking down the street, because their aggression is ignored by Dem legislature. I still love Nashville but I’m always amazed at how fast things can be trashed in the name of compassion.

DId you ask the question where were the homeless before? We’re they forced out of housing because of mental illness, gentrification? Did you ask any questions in a way geared to help the issues you saw?
I’m not even suggesting you do anything about it because you were just visiting, but did you think beyond a reflexive, “the Dems did this”
Your post would suggest no, you did not. Start thinking, not blaming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please remember that state and local elections are JUST as important as federal.

Yes! I do!

Exactly. Now the power is really in the hands of the people, where it belongs. It’s a great opportunity to turn red states blue. First thing is the economy though because if people can’t feed the families they have, abortion won’t even be on their minds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

But the ones that get mowed down by your AR 15s is just God's will, right?


You pro forced birthers have revealed yourself, nobody believes your empty words about babies anymore.

What gets me was learning how many abortion patients say the major reason they need an abortion is because they can’t afford to raise a child. (75% of abortion patients are low-income, the majority already have at least one child.) Supporting those mothers so they can have the baby should be a no-brainer for people who hate abortion. Real protections against pregnancy discrimination, access to affordable childcare, family leave and sick leave would help these women keep and raise their babies. And legal changes in that direction would be SO EASY because liberals would also be on board with making women’s lives better. AND most (all?) of those policies are viewed favorably by a majority of Americans.

No interest.

See also: anything that increases access to affordable contraception; anything that offers better protections against rape, stealthing (nonconsensual condom removal), or domestic abuse.

If we are concerned about people not being able to afford the kids we have, doesn’t border control make more sense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please remember that state and local elections are JUST as important as federal.

Yes! I do!

Exactly. Now the power is really in the hands of the people, where it belongs. It’s a great opportunity to turn red states blue. First thing is the economy though because if people can’t feed the families they have, abortion won’t even be on their minds.

Right- abortion won’t be on their minds…. Except when they get pregnant again and can’t afford (or find) formula.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Let’s reflect on the fact that all that happened is power is returned to the people through their states!

Different strokes for different folks.

You can have abortion on demand in California or Massachusetts. We can respectfully restrict it here in the Deep South.

We all win.

Right, because poor women in the south can easily pop over to California. They’ll just take the shifts off work, book the plane ticket for them and their children, and pay for a hotel room. Then they’ll pay for the procedure in cash. Right? All so simple! And what about women who find out that their fetus is incompatible with life at the 20 week anatomy scan? They should put their own health and their sanity on the back burner so you can pretend you’re saving someone? Your feelings do not supersede anyone else’s right to obtain medical care. Period.

Poor women in the south are voting with rich women in the south to choose life!

Take a seat white savior.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.

Why is this an issue. Is this a another “motherhood is magical” thing? Because she can certainly comprehend that she wants to make her own choices for her life without being married with a child.

What a stupid post.

The fact that 59% of abortion patients already have at least one child means there are plenty of pro-choice mothers to pick from.

And that’s not including the mothers like me who haven’t had abortions but became even more pro-choice once we experienced the full difficulties of pregnancy, childbirth, and parenting. My (unplanned) child is the light of my life, but I wouldn’t wish this on anyone who wasn’t willing going in.

I was always pro-choice but became staunchly so when pregnant with my first. It was hard AF. And by the time I got accidentally pregnant with a third that was most definitely not wanted, I was busy researching my abortion options. Fortunately for me, nature intervened and I miscarried. I had to have a D&C to make sure everything was gone. But some of these sickos believe even that is a crime. Its my most fervent wish that all of these people rot in hell.

+1. First pregnancy with husband ended in a miscarriage. I had to have a D&C which I guess would be illegal now?

No

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

But the ones that get mowed down by your AR 15s is just God's will, right?


You pro forced birthers have revealed yourself, nobody believes your empty words about babies anymore.

What gets me was learning how many abortion patients say the major reason they need an abortion is because they can’t afford to raise a child. (75% of abortion patients are low-income, the majority already have at least one child.) Supporting those mothers so they can have the baby should be a no-brainer for people who hate abortion. Real protections against pregnancy discrimination, access to affordable childcare, family leave and sick leave would help these women keep and raise their babies. And legal changes in that direction would be SO EASY because liberals would also be on board with making women’s lives better. AND most (all?) of those policies are viewed favorably by a majority of Americans.

No interest.

See also: anything that increases access to affordable contraception; anything that offers better protections against rape, stealthing (nonconsensual condom removal), or domestic abuse.

If we are concerned about people not being able to afford the kids we have, doesn’t border control make more sense?

There are poor people (Appalachia, downtown Baltimore) who have been here for many many generations. They are still poor in part because the biggest predictor of economic growth is the education level of women in an area. If you keep them pregnant and without access to abortions, watch your economy fall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really think panic has set in among forced birthers. For one thing, they’re not that smart and they didn’t think through the ramifications of the total bans in these states. Total ban means total ban and I don’t think OBs and gyns are going to risk their license and freedom to give a quiet abortion to a loose lipped forced birther.

For another thing, this is what they’ve campaigned on for decades. Think how fired up pro choice voters will be. Think how incendiary the anger of women who understand that the GOP thinks they’re just a uterus with legs and that they have no right to self determination or bodily autonomy.

And they’re not done. The right wing is clearly planning violence to try and pin it on pro choice people again, but we see them coming this time.

Tell on all your forced birther friends and family who have gotten an abortion. Share their names with everyone. Statistically speaking, forced birthers are just as likely to have had an abortion as pro choice people. Even the two repetitive pps who have been baby sitting this thread from Tennessee.

- with love from a pro choice and reliable Democratic voter raising three young boys to be pro choice feminists.

Does Mississippi protect the life of the mother? If so it’s not a total ban.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I like how she ignored the fact that the memo also said that abortion rights protests and abortion clinics were expected to be particular targets.

The fear isn't about violence from the left. It's about violence from the right.

I believe "Jane's Revenge" is a false flag group. They are the ones who supposedly broke windows and spray painted an anti abortion fake clinic but did little real damage. They are probably being funded by Project Veritas.

100%

All of the documented and prosecuted violence from the George Floyd protests were caused by right wingers. They have one playbook; they’re not serious people, they’re dopes. So who is more likely to commit violence: the same people who have been committing clinic violence and murders for the past fifty years (plus the violence at the protests two years ago plus that little attempted coup the GOP staged) or Jennifer down the street who has given to Planned Parenthood because they gave her birth control when she was 16 but is otherwise not super political?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I like how she ignored the fact that the memo also said that abortion rights protests and abortion clinics were expected to be particular targets.

The fear isn't about violence from the left. It's about violence from the right.

I believe "Jane's Revenge" is a false flag group. They are the ones who supposedly broke windows and spray painted an anti abortion fake clinic but did little real damage. They are probably being funded by Project Veritas.

100%

All of the documented and prosecuted violence from the George Floyd protests were caused by right wingers. They have one playbook; they’re not serious people, they’re dopes. So who is more likely to commit violence: the same people who have been committing clinic violence and murders for the past fifty years (plus the violence at the protests two years ago plus that little attempted coup the GOP staged) or Jennifer down the street who has given to Planned Parenthood because they gave her birth control when she was 16 but is otherwise not super political?

Bs what a lie/ tonnes of left wing activists were arrested. You make me sick.