Anonymous wrote:I would opt for 3 days cost permitting. At 3 the child is old enough to enjoy 3 days of activities and will benefit from socialization. 3 times is better than 2 because it gives more time for the child to get comfortable with the new routine. With just two half days it may take a little longer for the kiddo to adjust to the concept of pre-school. 3 days, of course, gives you more "me time". But both options are fine really.
My eldest went to part-day preschool (8-11:30) at 27 months and my middle child went at 23 months, the eldest for four days and the middle one for three days a week. We felt that they would adjust quicker if they went three days a week. I understand why people think it's totally unnecessary to send a child to preschool at 2 or 3 or even 4 if they already have a nanny or are staying home. It's definitely not necessary but it was a good experience for my eldest who has a late spring birthday and is thriving as one of the younger children in her prek class. The adjustment to prek for her has been pretty seamless even though she is in a very academic prek and was at a play based preschool. My eldest was definitely ready for 4 days a week at 27 months.
For my middle child, having caregivers who are not me or my husband or our nanny has been helpful. She would not separate from us at swim class (even if we were sitting on the pool deck) and go with the swim instructor but after a few months of preschool we tried swim classes again and she's fine. She may have gotten there anyway but I think that preschool helped her to feel more secure if one of her preferred/routine caregivers was not the individual providing care. I think my middle child would have been fine with 2 days a week since she was pretty young when she started going to preschool but we opted for 3 and she's had a really great experience.
There really isn't a right or wrong answer here.
|