Girls ECNL MidAtlantic Soccer Club Statistics Across All Age Groups

post reply Forum Index » Soccer
[Post New]12/21/2023 20:38
quote
Anonymous
Data Scraped from the Girls ECNL website on 12/21/2023 (https://theecnl.com/sports/2023/8/8/ECNLG_0808235831.aspx)

Below are some stats for the different ECNL Clubs in the MidAtlantic which covers each club's G05/06, G07, G08, G09, G10, and G11 teams. Still more games to be played. Several clubs seem to be coming into form having improved their W/L/D ratios over the past 4-5 games. Let me know if you are curious about other statistics that are no the ECNL website.




[Post New]12/21/2023 20:57
quote
Anonymous
Nerds!
[Post New]12/21/2023 20:58
quote
Anonymous
NVA has the highest win %?
[Post New]12/21/2023 20:58
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NVA has the highest win %?


In this area…
[Post New]12/21/2023 21:09
quote
Anonymous
Arlington 😳
[Post New]12/21/2023 21:14
quote
Anonymous
If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.
[Post New]12/21/2023 21:24
quote
Anonymous
I’m considering buying a club, so thanks for the all age group stats
[Post New]12/21/2023 21:57
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.


+1000000
[Post New]12/21/2023 23:46
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If you think winning percentage is an important part of youth sports, at any level, you are part of the problem.


Oh yes it is. How else do these club make money and keep the u littles coming in? It’s not about development it’s all about making money.
[Post New]12/22/2023 12:24
quote
Anonymous
For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.
[Post New]12/22/2023 15:02
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.


Ha!
[Post New]12/22/2023 21:06
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.


Ha!


Good argument. I bet you were captain of the debate team. Ha!
[Post New]12/22/2023 21:30
quote
Anonymous
ECNL will put the actual rankings out at the end of year. Cool spreadsheet though.
[Post New]12/22/2023 22:00
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:ECNL will put the actual rankings out at the end of year. Cool spreadsheet though.


VDA FTW
[Post New]12/23/2023 08:38
quote
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:For girls, I'd just average U15/U16/U17 to get an idea of strength. U18/19 can really drop off, because most of the better girls have already signed. Before U15 is still very much developmental and not always a fair reflection. Some clubs are more "win first" than others at the younger ages.


NP, and this makes no sense. ECNL starts at a certain age for a reason. I’m all for leaving out pre-ECNL, but once they’re playing 11v11, leaving out certain age groups ignores a big piece of the picture. Arlington 2011s are a perfect case in point.
post reply Forum Index » Soccer
Message Quick Reply
Go to: 

Search   Recent Topics   Hottest Topics