The Idaho crime house

[Anonymous]

is in the process of being knocked down, and will be gone at the end of this month. Some of the victims' families think it should stand, because their kids had such happy times there. The measurements and information required for the trial are being triple checked now, so to speak. Do you think that is why Kohberger killed those kids? (Because they were good looking, having fun, and living their best life in undergrad?) Or another reason?

[Anonymous]

It's the owner's right to knock down the house if they like.

[Anonymous]

I think he killed them because he wanted to prove that he could. I don’t know how he chose those particular victims.

[Anonymous]

I understand that it’s the owners right. I completely get it. I just hope that Kohberger doesn’t try and use the lack of house as a tool to get a mistrial or runaround of the facts.

[Anonymous]

of course it should be demolished. what kind of creeps would want to live there? no one i'd want to rent to.

i'd say they should wait until after the trial, so the jury has a chance to walk through if they want, but it seems like it's a pretty straightforward case, so maybe no one thinks that'll be necessary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I understand that it’s the owners right. I completely get it. I just hope that Kohberger doesn’t try and use the lack of house as a tool to get a mistrial or runaround of the facts.

+1

Same. I do think he killed them, having seen them where one of the victims worked. He may have been rebuffed by them (or one of them). I think he was jealous, and had a tremendous lack of coping skills, which is the scary part. Curious what others who have been following this crime might think.

[Anonymous]

They should wait until after trial to demolish b/c there still could be evidence in there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:of course it should be demolished. what kind of creeps would want to live there? no one i'd want to rent to.

i'd say they should wait until after the trial, so the jury has a chance to walk through if they want, but it seems like it's a pretty straightforward case, so maybe no one thinks that'll be necessary.

+1 I read the whole big thread on this and found the layout of the house really confusing. It should stay in case the jury agrees and seeing the scene would help.