IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is illegal how, exactly?

An investigation is warranted.
From the piece:

One could dismiss this as simply another tawdry example of access-peddling. Maybe that’s all it is. But only a complete investigation can ensure that it’s nothing worse.

Hunter selling access to his father is disreputable but completely legal. Similarly, Joe Biden participating in meetings that his son asked him to attend would constitute questionable judgment but not illegal conduct. The trouble comes if it moved beyond that to a shared business relationship in which the vice president was an active partner.

That’s what Republicans have long alleged. In their telling, Hunter made the contacts and the money, and his father provided the access that kept the money flowing. Some of that money flowed back to Joe Biden, they claim, pointing to an 2017 email found on Hunter’s laptop discussing a joint business deal with a Chinese energy conglomerate in which Hunter would hold 10 percent for “the big guy.” Such an arrangement could be illegal. (The elder Biden has denied it ever existed.)

And, if the most recent revelations about Joe threatening to withhold tax payer money from Ukraine unless Shokin was fired turn out to be true - it is bribery which is very illegal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is illegal how, exactly?

An investigation is warranted.
From the piece:

One could dismiss this as simply another tawdry example of access-peddling. Maybe that’s all it is. But only a complete investigation can ensure that it’s nothing worse.

Hunter selling access to his father is disreputable but completely legal. Similarly, Joe Biden participating in meetings that his son asked him to attend would constitute questionable judgment but not illegal conduct. The trouble comes if it moved beyond that to a shared business relationship in which the vice president was an active partner.

That’s what Republicans have long alleged. In their telling, Hunter made the contacts and the money, and his father provided the access that kept the money flowing. Some of that money flowed back to Joe Biden, they claim, pointing to an 2017 email found on Hunter’s laptop discussing a joint business deal with a Chinese energy conglomerate in which Hunter would hold 10 percent for “the big guy.” Such an arrangement could be illegal. (The elder Biden has denied it ever existed.)

And, if the most recent revelations about Joe threatening to withhold tax payer money from Ukraine unless Shokin was fired turn out to be true - it is bribery which is very illegal.

OMG this is what trump did. You people are crazy stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

You made the claim, sweetie. Prove it.
To recap... you claimed that Tristan Leavitt is running for office. And, presumably in WVA. Provide the proof of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is illegal how, exactly?

An investigation is warranted.
From the piece:

One could dismiss this as simply another tawdry example of access-peddling. Maybe that’s all it is. But only a complete investigation can ensure that it’s nothing worse.

Hunter selling access to his father is disreputable but completely legal. Similarly, Joe Biden participating in meetings that his son asked him to attend would constitute questionable judgment but not illegal conduct. The trouble comes if it moved beyond that to a shared business relationship in which the vice president was an active partner.

That’s what Republicans have long alleged. In their telling, Hunter made the contacts and the money, and his father provided the access that kept the money flowing. Some of that money flowed back to Joe Biden, they claim, pointing to an 2017 email found on Hunter’s laptop discussing a joint business deal with a Chinese energy conglomerate in which Hunter would hold 10 percent for “the big guy.” Such an arrangement could be illegal. (The elder Biden has denied it ever existed.)

And, if the most recent revelations about Joe threatening to withhold tax payer money from Ukraine unless Shokin was fired turn out to be true - it is bribery which is very illegal.

OMG this is what trump did. You people are crazy stupid.

Turns out that it may just be that Trump was right. And Biden is corrupt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is illegal how, exactly?

An investigation is warranted.
From the piece:

One could dismiss this as simply another tawdry example of access-peddling. Maybe that’s all it is. But only a complete investigation can ensure that it’s nothing worse.

Hunter selling access to his father is disreputable but completely legal. Similarly, Joe Biden participating in meetings that his son asked him to attend would constitute questionable judgment but not illegal conduct. The trouble comes if it moved beyond that to a shared business relationship in which the vice president was an active partner.

That’s what Republicans have long alleged. In their telling, Hunter made the contacts and the money, and his father provided the access that kept the money flowing. Some of that money flowed back to Joe Biden, they claim, pointing to an 2017 email found on Hunter’s laptop discussing a joint business deal with a Chinese energy conglomerate in which Hunter would hold 10 percent for “the big guy.” Such an arrangement could be illegal. (The elder Biden has denied it ever existed.)

And, if the most recent revelations about Joe threatening to withhold tax payer money from Ukraine unless Shokin was fired turn out to be true - it is bribery which is very illegal.

OMG this is what trump did. You people are crazy stupid.

I

n a 2018 interview at the Council on Foreign Relations, Biden bragged that he unilaterally withheld a billion dollars in US aid from the Ukrainians to force them to fire prosecutor general Viktor Shokin.

A State Department memo is shedding disturbing light on that account and shredding aspects of Biden’s justification for the action.

Indeed, the ultimatum may have been the quid in a quid pro quo agreement as part of the Biden influence-peddling scandal.

The premise of the story is that Biden took this extraordinary stand because there was little hope for the anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine if Shokin remained prosecutor.

That is now questionable.

The Oct. 1, 2015, memo summarizes the recommendation of the Interagency Policy Committee that was handling the anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine: “Ukraine has made sufficient progress on its reform agenda to justify a third guarantee.”

One senior official even complimented Shokin on his progress in fighting corruption.

So Biden was told to deliver on the federal aid but elected to unilaterally demand Shokin be fired.

When the firing occurred, Shokin’s office was investigating Burisma Holdings, an energy firm that paid Hunter Biden a huge amount of money.

https://jonathanturley.org/2023/08/23/joe-bidens-ukraine-defense-falls-apart/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

You made the claim, sweetie. Prove it.
To recap... you claimed that XXXXXXXXXX is running for office. And, presumably in WVA. Provide the proof of that.

I’m not driving traffic to that douche bag. Quit quoting grifters. It’s embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

You made the claim, sweetie. Prove it.
To recap... you claimed that XXXXXXXXXX is running for office. And, presumably in WVA. Provide the proof of that.

I’m not driving traffic to that douche bag. Quit quoting grifters. It’s embarrassing.

I'd be embarrassed too if I were you. Making claims that turn out to be false and being totally snarky about it.
Tell you what... I'll be kind. Google Tristan Leavitt and find out who he is. He is not a candidate for any office. And, he is not a grifter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

You made the claim, sweetie. Prove it.
To recap... you claimed that XXXXXXXXXX is running for office. And, presumably in WVA. Provide the proof of that.

I’m not driving traffic to that douche bag. Quit quoting grifters. It’s embarrassing.

I'd be embarrassed too if I were you. Making claims that turn out to be false and being totally snarky about it.
Tell you what... I'll be kind. Google Tristan Leavitt and find out who he is. He is not a candidate for any office. And, he is not a grifter.

Or you could go on his LinkedIn in a see him running for office. Whatever

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I mean ….
They gotta post something right?
They haven’t found evidence of a crime, but they gotta say something …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

You made the claim, sweetie. Prove it.
To recap... you claimed that XXXXXXXXXX is running for office. And, presumably in WVA. Provide the proof of that.

I’m not driving traffic to that douche bag. Quit quoting grifters. It’s embarrassing.

I'd be embarrassed too if I were you. Making claims that turn out to be false and being totally snarky about it.
Tell you what... I'll be kind. Google Tristan Leavitt and find out who he is. He is not a candidate for any office. And, he is not a grifter.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tristanleavitt_im-thrilled-to-announce-that-i-am-running-activity-7048767018208022529-K8iw/

This wasn't that hard, MAGA.
Oh wait, you're MAGA. Yes, it would be very hard for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Wow! I can’t believe this guy who is running for office in West Virginia as a conservative is saying Biden is a bad dude that should be investigated. Hot take! 💩

WTH are you talking about?

The guy tweeting this is running for office. Keep up.

Link? Citation?

What? Google it.

So, you are FOS.

This is why you believe stupid sh—-. You could easily learn some basic facts, but you are a lazy POS. I’m not doing your homework for you.

You made the claim, sweetie. Prove it.
To recap... you claimed that XXXXXXXXXX is running for office. And, presumably in WVA. Provide the proof of that.

I’m not driving traffic to that douche bag. Quit quoting grifters. It’s embarrassing.

I'd be embarrassed too if I were you. Making claims that turn out to be false and being totally snarky about it.
Tell you what... I'll be kind. Google XXXXXXXXXX and find out who he is. He is not a candidate for any office. And, he is not a grifter.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tristanleavit_im-thrilled-to-announce-that-i-am-running-activity-7048767018208022529-K8iw/

This wasn't that hard, MAGA.
Oh wait, you're MAGA. Yes, it would be very hard for you.

it was possibly ruse to drive traffic to his grifting campaign. Maybe. Or maybe they are ALL GULLIBLE RUBES who parroting any idiot on twitter. It’s maybe a little of both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

And, if the most recent revelations about Joe threatening to withhold tax payer money from Ukraine unless Shokin was fired turn out to be true - it is bribery which is very illegal.



"Biden" wasn't threatening to withhold money for Shokin to benefit himself. In fact, that is what Trump did to Zalensky.

It was US policy that Biden was representing in his role as Vice President and on behalf of the American people, the IMF and other international NGO's that wanted Shokin out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is illegal how, exactly?

An investigation is warranted.
From the piece:

One could dismiss this as simply another tawdry example of access-peddling. Maybe that’s all it is. But only a complete investigation can ensure that it’s nothing worse.

Hunter selling access to his father is disreputable but completely legal. Similarly, Joe Biden participating in meetings that his son asked him to attend would constitute questionable judgment but not illegal conduct. The trouble comes if it moved beyond that to a shared business relationship in which the vice president was an active partner.

That’s what Republicans have long alleged. In their telling, Hunter made the contacts and the money, and his father provided the access that kept the money flowing. Some of that money flowed back to Joe Biden, they claim, pointing to an 2017 email found on Hunter’s laptop discussing a joint business deal with a Chinese energy conglomerate in which Hunter would hold 10 percent for “the big guy.” Such an arrangement could be illegal. (The elder Biden has denied it ever existed.)

And, if the most recent revelations about Joe threatening to withhold tax payer money from Ukraine unless Shokin was fired turn out to be true - it is bribery which is very illegal.

OMG this is what trump did. You people are crazy stupid.

I

n a 2018 interview at the Council on Foreign Relations, Biden bragged that he unilaterally withheld a billion dollars in US aid from the Ukrainians to force them to fire prosecutor general Viktor Shokin.

A State Department memo is shedding disturbing light on that account and shredding aspects of Biden’s justification for the action.

Indeed, the ultimatum may have been the quid in a quid pro quo agreement as part of the Biden influence-peddling scandal.

The premise of the story is that Biden took this extraordinary stand because there was little hope for the anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine if Shokin remained prosecutor.

That is now questionable.

The Oct. 1, 2015, memo summarizes the recommendation of the Interagency Policy Committee that was handling the anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine: “Ukraine has made sufficient progress on its reform agenda to justify a third guarantee.”

One senior official even complimented Shokin on his progress in fighting corruption.

So Biden was told to deliver on the federal aid but elected to unilaterally demand Shokin be fired.

When the firing occurred, Shokin’s office was investigating Burisma Holdings, an energy firm that paid Hunter Biden a huge amount of money.

https://jonathanturley.org/2023/08/23/joe-bidens-ukraine-defense-falls-apart/

citing jonthan turley for ANYTHING is a loser propostion.