|
In a write-up about the new interim state superintendent Dr. Carey Wright, WJLA digs into her major success in Mississippi, where she turned around a dire situation with reading levels by, surprise, surprise, holding back kids who didn't meet grade-level standards. Wow. What a shock.
Maryland, unbelievably, has fallen behind Mississippi in 4th grade reading levels so she's being brought in to save our sad state of afffairs: SOURCE: https://wjla.com/news/local/can-new-interim-superintendent-of-schools-deliver-a-miracle-in-maryland-mississippi-dr-carey-wright-third-grade-reading-retention-delegate-susan-krebs#
Dr. Wright avoids committing to implementing a similar retention policy at this point in MD, but that's because she knows the politics of our state and that the equity/social justice warriors will fight it tooth and nail, even though retention, standards and holding kids to them completely turned Mississippi around. Which is what we used to do in MD and MCPS, because the social justice/equity warriors decided rules and standards were tools of white supremacy that had to be eradicated. |
| I heard it was the No Child Left Behind policy that has been causing schools to push failing students through |
Yes the only real path forward in MD is to have more Advanced English for all programs. |
And resume Lucy Caulkins. |
Carrie Wright is from MCPS. She knows how to cook the books. Read up on what really went on in Mississippi, not the spin. |
Links? |
|
| Why do you really care so much? Until as a society we don’t put so much value in a HS diploma, it’s in all of our interests for as many people as possible to get them. That way they can get jobs. We don’t have to support people who have jobs. We don’t have to pass by people who work sleeping on the street because when you work, you can pay rent. And people who D out of HS aren’t going to take your kids’ spots in college. So I’m all for passing kids along. |
It seems like what Dr. Wright did in holding kids back who needed to be held back at third grade before it's too late is working. They're getting the reinforcement and re-education they need and getting back on track. It's far better to hold back a few kids for that one year they're behind than to set them up for failure by never stopping to address the learning gaps and shuffling them along and watching as they continue to fail year after year. Why is 3rd grade retention a bad thing in your eyes? |
It seems she just didn’t bother to count dropouts! Miracle https://www.osa.ms.gov/documents/performance/2020_Office-of-Dropout-Prevention_Report.pdf |
So helping kids actually learn to read, so that they can jobs, actual jobs, to support themselves is not a worthy goal? Why not just hand high school diplomas to all of the 5 year olds and be done with it? |
It isn't. People need to get over this notion that everyone should have the same outcome. We need to meet kids where they are and do the best we can for them as individuals. |
Not everyone enjoys school. I'd imagine many of those kids with behavioral issues are just frustrated and might be better served by alternative pathway. |
NP here, The research says that holding kids back results in test years the following year that are higher than they would have had in that grade if promoted the year before, but lower than the test grades they would have had at that point in time if promoted the year before, and that even that gain disappears and they graduate less frequently, and without more skill than they would have had. Your data supports that. But the goal isn't to increase 4th grade test scores. It's to increase their abilities at the point at which they leave school, whether that's graduation or dropping out. Retention is also an incredibly expensive intervention. Mississippi averages about $12K per year in per pupil spending. If you spent that $12K on implementing research based intervention into the kids most likely to fail 3rd grade before they failed, you would almost certainly see more growth, without jeopardizing their chances at graduation. |
|
I had a child in MCPS that went to Pre-school and had a great foundation by MCPS standards when she entered kindergarten. As time went on, though, she fell further and further behind despite EMT meetings. We were told by MCPS at first to read with our child so we did. She was given extra homework and site word cards so we sat down with her each night so she would practice what MCPS said she would practice but she still fell behind. Teachers kept telling us in kindergarten, 1st and 2nd grade that kids have tremendous growth by 3rd grade so even though she was falling further and further behind, don’t worry. Then she hit 3rd grade and was off grade level. The teacher called an IEP meeting, MCPS tested her for a Specific Disability in Reading then said the results stated that she didn’t have that so she didn’t qualify for an IEP. When I asked the 10 people team what would the school do so she could learn how to read, the Principal said that because my daughter didn’t have a disability, there were no instructional programs she qualified for. MCPS was content to keep passing a child from grade to grade who wasn’t reading on grade level without helping the child to learn how to read.
What saved my child? I paid thousands of dollars for private testing. She had a disability not identified by MCPS. When I took the 30 page report with data and instructional recommendations, MCPS recognized her disability but they couldn’t implement the instructional recommendations. So I hired a private tutor to work with my child to teach her to read with the Lindamood Bell method. My child finally was able to catch up with her peers over the next year. Ignoring problems never solves them. Specialized interventions work. Drawing a line in the sand might encourage MCPS to not fail our children by passing them through without basic skills. |