|
I had to read this caption three times to confirm the blonde standing in the Brady Bunch kitchen is 53 years old. Wearing the required uniform of a CEO's wife, a body con, cleavage-baring dress, but she still looks freakishly young with no hint of trout pout a la Lauren Sanchez. It's hard to find any photos of her on social media, so I'm not sure how filtered this pic is, but that would be unusual for WSJ, right? I need to know her plastic surgery secrets.
https://www.wsj.com/real-estate/luxury-homes/the-brady-bunch-house-sells-for-3-2-million-1c792518?st=7vxtj81ryyh6115&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink |
| There are oodles of photos of her? Just type her name into google and hit “images.” |
She doesn't look natural/ normal at all. Looks freakish but not freakishly young. |
| Yea, you're right, though they all seemed to be Getty images from events, not any that might be more natural/candid. Her name is Tina Trahan for anyone who cares to google. She is married to the HBO CEO, and just bought the Brady Bunch house "for fun." |
|
She's obviously naturally very pretty but also looks like she's had a lot of work done, and that specific photo is clearly doctored. The super fake tan and fake teeth and fake hair overshadow what appears to be some subtle work on her face.
I mean, avoiding that Lauren Sanchez lip thing just requires you to not go nuts with Botox and filler near your mouth. No lip flip. It's not rocket science. One reason it's consistently surprising that wealthy, attractive women keep doing this to themselves is that it is predictable. And there are so many high profile examples. If you see it on women like Nicole Kidman and Sandra Bullock, both very beautiful women with access to the best possible care and services, then maybe it's a sign that you should simply NOT do that, accept some of the lines around your mouth and even a slight downturn, in exchange for not looking like that. It's fairly self-evident. |
|
The other pictures of her online show a woman who is clearly not young so I am not sure what is going on here. Maybe she has had more work done. I don’t like whatever the surgeon did with her eyes. She is not quite as stretched out as Lauren Sanchez but that is not saying much.
I know for myself I wouldn’t want to age this way. I don’t want to look like someone who is trying so hard to look like a sex kitten. It just seems exhausting and sad. |
| Bad boob job though. |
This photo is from 2003:
2017:
I’m not sure about this one:
|
|
Tina Trahan is an interesting one. She used to be Tiger Wood's madam, recruiting girls for he and his friends to sleep with.
https://nypost.com/2009/12/17/woods-was-high-roller-at-vegas-blackjack-table/ Meanwhile, the Manhattan woman who introduced Woods to mistress Theresa Rogers was identified yesterday by Deadspin.com as 39-year-old single mom Tina Trahan. Trahan’s role was to pack Tiger’s private plane with beautiful women who’d accompany his pals to events and outings. |
So what? Maybe they like that lip look. There's no normative view on beauty. I personally find lip wrinkles much uglier than lip filler. |
| Arms don’t lie. |
Are you sure that’s the same one? |
| She looks chock full of filler. And all teeth are caps. |
that picture is so incredibly doctored. |
He jawline in later photos looks so much different than the earlier photo. Is more square. What sort of procedure is that? |