Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:That is a dim analysis. There is an enormous difference between the average 15 and 13 year old. There is an enormous physical and developmental difference between boys who are 19 and kids who are 16 or 17, and it is a comical difference between a 19 year old and a 14 year old. Nothing you wrote makes any sense or holds and point.
You aren't very bright. There is no point in continuing to try to enlighten you. Good luck in your quest to eliminate "red shirting" I'm sure the powers that be will be impressed by the strength of your arguments.
www.cdc.gov/growthcharts
Please enlighten us all on how wrong the CDC and WHO statistics is for growth curves of boys. Maybe they're not as bright as you either. The fact is your daddy eyes on lacrosse players have been fooling you. There are enormous differences physically between adolescent boys two years apart in every decile of the data. Boys are not done growing height wise on average until 19, and carry a lot of weight growth between 16 and 19. There is no way anyone's eyes could look at this data and agree that the spread between 14 and 19 is unsafe for the kids. Grab a Bud Light and call it a day pal, you're done.
My God you are dense.
Here's an actual lacrosse roster for you to consider:
http://www.gonzaga.org/page.aspx?pid=490
You'll see a 205 lb freshman, a 230 lb sophomore a 285 junior and a 165 lb senior -- according to your data this is impossible because none of these living breathing student athletes are "average" -- how dumb can one person be? Please stop before you embarrass yourself further. Also, note that the 285 lb player would still be out there to play against you fragile snowflake even under a no red shirt rule.