Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

European leaders are expressing pity for American women today. We’re not even a laughing stock anymore as a country, they just pity us for having to live in this shithole country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you believe the government gets to control what a woman does with her body you are NOT a small government person and we will call you out every time you complain about government regulation.

Hypocrites.

You are so ignorant.

DP. C'mon. Show us the contortions you get into to define this as small government. It will be entertaining.

Clearly you don't understand the decision, nor the concept of small government. You are also ignorant. It's not my job to help you learn. I am merely taking some pleasure pointing out your ignorance.

Clearly you think the concept of small government means when things you approve of are not regulated, while things you don't approve of are.

Not at all. First it means the federal government has limited powers, which this decision aligns with. Second it means that laws are enacted by elected representatives, which this decision also aligns with. The people can vote and elect whatever representative to implement whatever implantation they want. It matters none whether I agree or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Getting lectured by people wearing magic underwear is peak 2022.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of migrating between states will be going on.

You'll have to do a pregnancy test first...

It costs $10 at a drugstore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Is everyone from Utah stupid as shit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Hmmm. It used to be that husbands were held not to be capable of rape. If they insisted on sex, and wives didn't yield willingly, no harm or foul -- there was no such thing as "marital rape."

Is she specifically saying women can say no this time? Or is this one of those "if you don't want to get pregnant, you can control the intake of sperm by swallowing or backdoor access?

How vulgar is this going, actually?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict we'll be more responsible and also stop being selfish and having babies late with the idea we can just abort if we get a bad egg

I agree with this. Younger women won’t make the mistakes our generation made

Total BS. In the red states, women marry and reproduce young and live a poor life. Red states = pootr states, supported by the federal budget. In the blue states, women have careers and have babies late, so they do blood work/CVS/amnio and if things don't look good, they can have an abortion whenever.

You must live a very privileged life if you haven't seen all the uneducated residents living with crime and poverty in Blue states.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you believe the government gets to control what a woman does with her body you are NOT a small government person and we will call you out every time you complain about government regulation.

Hypocrites.

You are so ignorant.

DP. C'mon. Show us the contortions you get into to define this as small government. It will be entertaining.

Clearly you don't understand the decision, nor the concept of small government. You are also ignorant. It's not my job to help you learn. I am merely taking some pleasure pointing out your ignorance.

Clearly you think the concept of small government means when things you approve of are not regulated, while things you don't approve of are.

Not at all. First it means the federal government has limited powers, which this decision aligns with. Second it means that laws are enacted by elected representatives, which this decision also aligns with. The people can vote and elect whatever representative to implement whatever implantation they want. It matters none whether I agree or not.

Except it does not do that. It vastly expands the power of both the federal and state governments. Rights are the only things that limit government power. By eliminating a right the decision grants more power to the government because now the government can act, either way, whereas before it could not either way. At The decision gives unlimited powers to the govenment on everything except guns, speech and religion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, 6-3 decision, not even close.

Here comes the summer of rage.

Typical liberals, don’t get what they want so they riot. One of these days we’ll get tired of you and riot right back at you.

You lost the first Civil War, you'll lose this one. The rioting phase is over, time for the guillotines.

Seriously. Brains and wealth will always triumph. The reds might have guns, but that's about all they've got.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict we'll be more responsible and also stop being selfish and having babies late with the idea we can just abort if we get a bad egg

I agree with this. Younger women won’t make the mistakes our generation made

Total BS. In the red states, women marry and reproduce young and live a poor life. Red states = pootr states, supported by the federal budget. In the blue states, women have careers and have babies late, so they do blood work/CVS/amnio and if things don't look good, they can have an abortion whenever.

You must live a very privileged life if you haven't seen all the uneducated residents living with crime and poverty in Blue states.

DP. But surely you acknowledge that the social safety nets are stronger in blue states. That's just facts. For example, expansion of Medicaid.

Ratios aren't just dependent on individual stories, but are driven by general trends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you believe the government gets to control what a woman does with her body you are NOT a small government person and we will call you out every time you complain about government regulation.

Hypocrites.

You are so ignorant.

DP. C'mon. Show us the contortions you get into to define this as small government. It will be entertaining.

Clearly you don't understand the decision, nor the concept of small government. You are also ignorant. It's not my job to help you learn. I am merely taking some pleasure pointing out your ignorance.

Clearly you think the concept of small government means when things you approve of are not regulated, while things you don't approve of are.

Not at all. First it means the federal government has limited powers, which this decision aligns with. Second it means that laws are enacted by elected representatives, which this decision also aligns with. The people can vote and elect whatever representative to implement whatever implantation they want. It matters none whether I agree or not.

This is nonsensical. You know it’s wrong, don’t you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you believe the government gets to control what a woman does with her body you are NOT a small government person and we will call you out every time you complain about government regulation.

Hypocrites.

You are so ignorant.

DP. C'mon. Show us the contortions you get into to define this as small government. It will be entertaining.

Clearly you don't understand the decision, nor the concept of small government. You are also ignorant. It's not my job to help you learn. I am merely taking some pleasure pointing out your ignorance.

Clearly you think the concept of small government means when things you approve of are not regulated, while things you don't approve of are.

Not at all. First it means the federal government has limited powers, which this decision aligns with. Second it means that laws are enacted by elected representatives, which this decision also aligns with. The people can vote and elect whatever representative to implement whatever implantation they want. It matters none whether I agree or not.

What a barrel of crap. The same zealots advocating for overturning Roe want to use the power of the federal, state and local government to punish women and criminalize reproductive health. It was never about abortion. It is ultimately about control and agency. Control over reproductive rights, contraception and relationships. It’s ultimately people who have an issue with sex. Just look at Alito’s opinion where he draws a parallel between same sex marriage and illicit drug use and prostitution.

[Anonymous]

Monsters

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you believe the government gets to control what a woman does with her body you are NOT a small government person and we will call you out every time you complain about government regulation.

Hypocrites.

You are so ignorant.

DP. C'mon. Show us the contortions you get into to define this as small government. It will be entertaining.

Clearly you don't understand the decision, nor the concept of small government. You are also ignorant. It's not my job to help you learn. I am merely taking some pleasure pointing out your ignorance.

Clearly you think the concept of small government means when things you approve of are not regulated, while things you don't approve of are.

Not at all. First it means the federal government has limited powers, which this decision aligns with. Second it means that laws are enacted by elected representatives, which this decision also aligns with. The people can vote and elect whatever representative to implement whatever implantation they want. It matters none whether I agree or not.

Except it does not do that. It vastly expands the power of both the federal and state governments. Rights are the only things that limit government power. By eliminating a right the decision grants more power to the government because now the government can act, either way, whereas before it could not either way. At The decision gives unlimited powers to the govenment on everything except guns, speech and religion.

Seriously? There were no state laws regulating abortion before today?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, 6-3 decision, not even close.

Here comes the summer of rage.

Typical liberals, don’t get what they want so they riot. One of these days we’ll get tired of you and riot right back at you.

You lost the first Civil War, you'll lose this one. The rioting phase is over, time for the guillotines.

Seriously. Brains and wealth will always triumph. The reds might have guns, but that's about all they've got.

They’ve got really big pickup trucks too. So cool.