Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
I don't think she was a gold digger in the true sense. That is, I believe she did love him, she didn't get into it only because of the money though obviously that was also something she cared for. He also didn't seem blind to the fact that she liked material things. I think they both knew it wasn't an ideal fit but they thought it was a situation they could make work since they also cared for each other a lot. Even before marriage they were a couple with a whole lot of turmoil (they've both mentioned it and the many times they broke up and got back together). |
Anonymous
doing a bit for radio (one that is easy to figure out is fake) is a far cry from what N has done. |
Anonymous
No. What she did when she left proves what kind of a person she is. And he would not have said all of that on the air if it wasn't true because she could have sued him and the radio station. So the theory that it was all a lie is ridiculous. I've had personal experiences with her, as have some of my friends, and she's not a good person. Kane has a good heart, she's not a nice person. |
Anonymous
|
Well, don't you think his presentation of the situation manipulates everyone into believing his side of things? It's a little manipulating to air your divorce on the air and then to plead on social media for listeners not to attack her. Then, he tries to have a phone call on air with his daughter on her birthday?
What did he think would happen? How on earth did airing his marital problems help his kids or help resolve the divorce? I don't think he is nearly as nice as he portrays on air. My sense is that they are both troubled and battle their own demons. |
Anonymous
|
I find it a little funny that so many people on here are bashing N for being a stay at home mom, like she is the first mother to do so in the history of mankind. SAHM's do stuff like blog/shop..or do people on here think that being a SAHM entails just sitting in the corner of your house waiting for your husband to get home every day? If they have the means to live that lifestyle (which they do), then I say go for it...
A lot of people are so riled up by the divorce when they honestly don't know either P or N. For all we know P could be a completely different person behind closed doors, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if he played a major role in how they ended up here. N used to work (in radio as well I think?) so not working, to be a SAHM, was a joint decision they made as a couple. People post comments like "all she does is post pics of stuff she buys on Instagram"...Lets face it that's what most people use Instagram for, nobody wants to see a pic of you brushing your teeth every morning. Another one I loved "N is quite ugly"--> that is just mean and unnecessary, I think she is pretty good looking, and tbh there is a good chance that she is better looking than the person that posted that comment. Stop being a jealous "mean girl", nobody on here is a 10/10 so why does she need to be. As for all the comments on her spending. It doesn't seem that over the top to me, especially for a couple with their income (who knows what the actual numbers are but it is certainly well above average). Most of what she spends on goes towards the girls/home so I doubt P has any problem with that, I'm sure he loves that his girls get to have that sort of a childhood. There's no reason to bash N simply because that sort of spending does not fit into your lifestyle as well. Do you think the mega-rich spend 80 million dollars on one painting because they "should"? Please...My wife's nail polish collection could probably rival N's and we have nowhere near the income that P has. Nail polish is a collection you build up over years it's not like she went and bought all those bottles in one outing. Again more of the "ill be a mean girl because I can post anonymously on DCUM".... Sorry I just got tired of reading so many comments on here against N, when nobody even knows what happened. Sometimes marriages don't work out, and you can try to stay in it for the kids but sometimes even that doesn't work, it's a fact of life...it doesn't mean either of them are bad people. |
Anonymous
He meant he caught her in a lie about the car, and he said he had questioned her motives with regard to their marriage. Not sure about her medical issues but she does have other issues she should deal with especially since they have young kids she is responsible for (ahem, running the car into the wall and lying about it, but he purposely said he wouldn't say why it happened...) Of course he is not perfect, and I am not going to say that his airing of this dirty laundry was the right thing or the "high road" but it doesn't mean it's not true. If she hadn't left him in that way, in such a malicious, hateful, and psychotic way, he wouldn't have had any juicy material to air. Of course he was a "scorned husband" doing this, but she had no problem spending all the money he's made getting this audience and the funny thing is, she OBVIOUSLY likes all of the attention... otherwise she would have deleted her social media profiles/made them private, and flown under the radar. She is loving this! |
Anonymous
| Custody was one of the issues requesting the Court's assistance/guidance/order on. Same with "possession of property," "sale of real property," "sale of personal property," "sale in lieu of partition," determine ownership of property," and "health and hospitalization insurance" |
Anonymous
| Even if she's a so-called gold digger (which I don't necessarily agree), that doesn't mean that Kane is a saint. He could very well still have gotten violent as some have suggested. This is not a one person is good, one is bad situation. |
Anonymous
| Coming home in the wee hours of the night (wasn't it after midnight?) and finding everyone gone and then going to sleep without knowing where they are is not a normal response, under any circumstances. Unless you are a terrible husband/father, which I don't think he is. Obviously he left something out that he didn't want people to know or changed the story of what actually happened. |
Anonymous
| Oh I agree....she must love the attention on SM....otherwise she would make her stuff private. She is loving it! |
Anonymous
If he was violent, which knowing him I HIGHLY doubt, don't you think he'd want to keep that on the DL.. and blasting his story on the air the way he did would have just fueled the fire for her to give it right back and say "he hit me!" or whatever. If he had that much to hide he would not have risked it by putting any of it on the air. Why is it so hard for people to believe she sucks? |
Anonymous
I doubt anyone here including yourself knows how N is or always has been. If what you say is true (which I doubt) than the joke is on Kane for being dumb enough to marry someone like that when so many people like yourself knew she was a "gold digging snotface", in which case he deserved it. People are siding with him b.c he aired his dirty laundry on a national broadcast, while she has remained pretty secretive about the whole thing (good for her, at least one person knows what is good for the girls) |
Anonymous
Agreed. And she has an outlet, her blog, which people are just dying to read. Not the audience that he has, but we're all waiting with baited breath so she does have a way to put her side out there. |
Anonymous
I really hate when people say it's HIS money. It's THEIR money. She's staying at home, taking care of the kids. I assume that was a mutual decision. And the way she went about it - if what Kane says is true - is the advice given to those who experience domestic violence. Particularly for SAHM, if the husband is in control of the money, they are trapped. |
Anonymous
| I think the worse part about all of this is that we...as a collective group of admirers of both P and N (in some way)....really have no clue what the real truth is. We all would like to assume or speculate based on what HE has said thus far, but we must remember the fact that SHE has not really given any details to the story. We are all standing here on the outside looking into their little world that has been clearly turned upside down, making accusations to a story we truly no nothing about- nothing factual at least. Its a sad situation that these little girls will have to live with day in and day out- to try to understand why their family is now different from what they have always known. Yes, they are little and will get through - but its still a shame. Its sad to sit back and really think about the small percentages of marriages that truly last until "death do us part". |