Be honest: did you think about future dating opportunities for your child when you decided to send

[Anonymous]

them to private, especially if they’ll be lifers?

[Anonymous]

Lol, no.

[Anonymous]

That was my only reason for sending my DD to private. I don't want her ever to have to work or raise a finger when she has kids. She will need someone to support her and provide all the best material things and nannies so she can live her life of leisure like she deserves.

[Anonymous]

Well considering in my DD’s grade there are way more girls than boys I don’t think dating prospects was the top of my mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well considering in my DD’s grade there are way more girls than boys I don’t think dating prospects was the top of my mind.

Maybe she’ll be a lesbian.

[Anonymous]

OP are you just bored and trying to come up with the stupidest question you can think of?

[Anonymous]

It’s the truth nobody wants to acknowledge.

[Anonymous]

Yes yes of course we shell out big bucks hoping our child will meet their soul mate over cheeze its and granola bars.

[Anonymous]

#ewwwwwww

[Anonymous]

This never, ever occurred to me. I find this such an odd question but I guess we will see if anyone says that they did factor it in to their decision.

[Anonymous]

This should win some sort of award for the dumbest dcum post of all time

[Anonymous]

Not dating, but definitely peer group.

[Anonymous]

Single sex school and my DDs seem to like boys so… no.

[Anonymous]

Of course! It was our primary consideration. It wasn’t yours?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:them to private, especially if they’ll be lifers?

Yes, though not quite in the way is being alluded to. My DD's personality and needs were forefront when I made a school's social environment runner up to academics on the priorities list. The social environment/school culture was super important as I considered future relationships (friendships and boyfriends).