|
Looks like someone from DCRA (the part that is now DLCP) is/was taking licensing kickbacks to give unqualified people cosmetology and barber licenses for money.
https://wjla.com/features/i-team/dc-cosmetology-license-department-of-licensing-and-consumer-protection-barber-beauty-school-industry-fake-certification-francis-olivia-french-mayor-muriel-bowser-institute-classes-hair-stylist-professional-training-paul-mitchell-david-brunson# |
| I mean, this has been DCRA’s grift for decades. The bldg inspectors were the worst. |
| You must be new. Corruption in DC government is endemic and has been for decades. |
|
Cosmetology and barbers don't need extensive licensing requirements. It's gatekeeping.
The argument I heard was that they use "chemicals" and have "sharp" tools. By that logic, landscapers should have licenses. |
The hygiene requirements are my big concern. I don't want to catch someone's skin disease because the barber wasn't trained in cleaning their tools properly. |
Ok, cool. Then we shouldn't care about it? Weird take, bro. |
Licensing doesn't enforce this though. You want inspection of registered businesses. |
I agree; I know too many young men in the city that want to cut hair legally, but the cost for the licensing is obscene. |
| Cheat on your taxes. Jump the metro turnstiles. Print out those fake dealer plates. |
A fish rots from the head first. |
The new DLCP has the cosmetology board, cosmetology licensing applications/licensing, and registered businesses all under its purview. |
So why don't food vendors have the same extensive licensing requirements? You don't need a thousand hours of food prep training to open a hotdog cart or work in a McDonald's. |
I think food vendors are licensed under DLCP, but with DOH guidelines. Not sure. |
It's good to know that food requires less hygiene than hair. 1000 hours of training to cut hair. 0 hours of training to make a burger. https://beautyschoolprograms.com/cosmetology-licensing-requirements/ |
| Restaurants do need licenses and certified food managers on staff. And they are subject to inspection. |