Let’s hope DC and the suburban jurisdictions (MoCo, et al) follow NYC’s lead: safer for all

Anonymous
NYT just announced Eric Adams will have the NYPD involuntarily confine mentally ill, at risk people to treat their mental illness. Thank God! We need this here too!
Anonymous
serious question - where will they put all these people? are those places equipped to handle them?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:serious question - where will they put all these people? are those places equipped to handle them?


They plan to bus to FL and Tx.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:serious question - where will they put all these people? are those places equipped to handle them?


They plan to bus to FL and Tx.


Yep, this is the answer
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NYT just announced Eric Adams will have the NYPD involuntarily confine mentally ill, at risk people to treat their mental illness. Thank God! We need this here too!


Another serious question: is this constitutional?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:NYT just announced Eric Adams will have the NYPD involuntarily confine mentally ill, at risk people to treat their mental illness. Thank God! We need this here too!


I don't know the details but something on these lines has to be done.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NYT just announced Eric Adams will have the NYPD involuntarily confine mentally ill, at risk people to treat their mental illness. Thank God! We need this here too!


Another serious question: is this constitutional?


Nope. So what.
Anonymous
It is not humane to leave sick people out on the street to hurt themselves and others. No rational objective person would choose that life. They need help. I think Adams made the right decision.

.
Anonymous
I love Eric Adams! Can he be our mayor next?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I love Eric Adams! Can he be our mayor next?


Wouldn’t that be awesome?
Anonymous
10 bucks says the Supreme Court slaps down NYC’s plan.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:10 bucks says the Supreme Court slaps down NYC’s plan.


any federal district court - wasn't it a court decision that emptied the mental hospitals like St. Elizabeth's in the first place?

Anonymous
What is the difference between this an an FD12 which already exists and is used in DC?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What is the difference between this an an FD12 which already exists and is used in DC?


Well, FD12 is a limited time deal and the confinement needs to be constantly re-evaluated at very short intervals before a court (48 hours? It's been a while since I worked psych). It's essentially a "let's take a breather" maneuver to medicate a person who wasn't taking their meds. Patch 'em up -- again, during a quick involuntary interval that involves a LOT of meds -- and send 'em back out.

The classic case is schizophrenia - a front-loading of meds over a few days into a person who's been noncompliant will quickly change their demeanor and make them appear competent before the judge to make their own decision. To be let out, which of course is their wish. Onto the "street," where they will invariably become non-compliant again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It is not humane to leave sick people out on the street to hurt themselves and others. No rational objective person would choose that life. They need help. I think Adams made the right decision.

.


But his plan SPECIFICALLY is talking about people who are NEITHER a danger to themselves or others.
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: