Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
| Mckenzie what kind of car did your rich mom buy you in 10th grade? |
Nope. There is mention of "seizure-like activity," not "seizure disorder" in any of the excerpts of the medical documentation. I work with interpretations of EEGs. I know the wording to indicate "pseudoseizures," or what we now euphemistically call "psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES)." I'm not diagnosing her, obviously, but I am saying the wording is not consistent with a medical diagnosis of epileptic seizures. That wording is much different. I think continuing to perpetuate the error of "seizure disorder" as a diagnosis is a pretty clear attempt to elide the (more acceptable) medical connotation with the (embarrassing and not as convincing) likely psych nature of the inpatient stay. And inpatient stays aren't that long without either very clear diagnoses or some psych component. |
Only a rich kid would phrase a response like this. Instability? She was at a posh $30,000 a year day school in the lily white suburbs. She wasn't kicked out of school and forced to attend some crap hole public high school in the slums of East St Louis. And nothing about her forcing the foster care issue is normal. A normal rich 16-18 year old is going to move in with family or friends from school. She wanted to be in foster care because it provided a way to erase her old pumpkin spice latte rich white girl life and exploit Questbridge and an Ivy League school. |
How could she not know? Mackenzie bragged about all this publicly. |
| What I want is Makenzie to write a Tell all book. How did she do this? It's impressive as it's own achievement. |
Her getting into an Ivy with Questbridge was in local newspapers? |
??? How would the mother know what she put on her Questbridge application? She wasn't even living at home at the time, and it doesn't sound like the two were talking. |
|
Well, I’m calling you out. Much of the manipulation, parsing of language, and exaggerations were done by Penn’s own PR team in promoting her Rhodes Scholar achievement. But the same articles which had Penn as their source and which included exaggerations by the reporter herself are hung around MF’s neck as though she wrote them and as though she was the source. Why a you not all over Penn and the Inquirer for their role in this. Why are you perpetuating the inaccuracy that all of this came from her? Why are you not holding Penn and the Inquirer responsible for their roles? You’re so anxious to stomp on a young kid that you’re the one ignoring the facts: FACT - She was a legitimate Questbridge Scholar. Questbridge said so at the time and their Director said so again after a recent review of her application even in light of new information. You obviously don’t like the fact that she qualified, but she did. And she’s not responsible for the fact that the Questbridge system allowed her to qualify. That is the truth and you’re the one who’s not sticking to it. FACT - She got into Penn legitimately. Exaggerations didn’t play a role in that. Once she got there she excelled in the classroom. And she completed all of the requirements for her MSW based on Penn’s own written notification to her. Yet, Penn threatened to rescind her BA and is still threatening to withhold the MSW which they themselves said she had already earned. Any exaggerations in her Rhodes application had nothing to do with her MSW. She withdrew from Rhodes, so that is no longer an issue, but Penn continues to withhold her degree anyway. That is indefensible. If it happened to me, I’d sue the university too. This misrepresentation of Penn as somehow the victim here has to stop. Their behaviour throughout this entire situation has been sloppy, incompetent, irresponsible, and hypocritical. Time to call them out for the corrupt organization they are. Their recent treatment of the women on their swim team shows that this bullying and intimidation of women students is a pattern on their part. It’s time they were called out for it. |
| Hey. Start a thread about U Penn f you want, but a) stay on topic, and b) stop perpetuating inaccuracies. |
| I guess my end question is why did a resources teen who grew up in a 4000 sq ft house and was privately educated her entire life decide foster care was the answer when she has so many other options, including her father, other relatives and friends/network at her private school? |
You’re full of it. She never claimed to have been kicked out of school. Her attendance at a posh school in the suburbs was no secret. She never misrepresented this. Penn knew perfectly well what prep school she attended when they admitted her as a Questbridge Scholar. You hav no evidence that she forced the foster care issue or that she concocted a scheme to exploit Questbridge and an Ivy, yet you’re stating that as a fact. Here you are doing exactly what you are accusing her of doing. And how would anyone “force” a foster care issue anyway? Social Services are extremely reluctant to remove children from their homes. Extremely reluctant. And where was the mother through all of this? Why wasn’t she “forcing the issue” in the other direction to have MacKenzie returned to her home? Why wasn’t she begging for he daughter’s return and expressing her willingness to agree to counseling and/or anything else that the system might require of her? How did she let MacKenzie go so easily? Are you saying that MacKenzie is some force of nature that she intimidated her mother, duped social services, duped the medical professionals, duped the police, duped Questbridge, and duped Penn? If so, she must be incredible and the world must be full of incompetents everywhere we turn up to and including the highest levels of our top universities. |
I am on topic, tough guy. Penn is part of the story about how she became a Rhodes Scholar. Their endorsement as key to her achieving that. And I’m not perpetuating any inaccuracies. It’s the claims of the MF critics which are replete with inaccuracies, wild speculation, and outright lies. |
|
Good question. |