DC Council rejects increasing income tax rate.

[Anonymous]

http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2010/05/24/daily33.html

Finally some good news from the thieves in the Wilson Building. Vote out the old guard (Barry, Gray, Brown x 2)

[Anonymous]

So, it will stay at a max rate of 8.5% - one of the highest and the country and 3% mor than Maryland and Virginia - and we still can't send our kids to high school here.

[Anonymous]

Don't worry, we're having a massive demographic shift in this city. In about 10yrs or so it will be lower when we stop having to pay 10% of our income (combine prop taxes) to support people who refuse to work.

[Anonymous]

But, how? Those people who don't work are the ones who vote Barry and the like on to the city Council. And, now they are tax carzy with the bag tax and the thankfully-sut-down beverage tax.

[Anonymous]

Beverage tax is in! But they shut down H St street car another anti business move on Gray's part.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2010/05/24/daily33.html

Finally some good news from the thieves in the Wilson Building. Vote out the old guard (Barry, Gray, Brown x 2)

The tax increase was sponsored by Graham. Gray and one Brown voted against it. But, don't let facts stand in the way of your goal to get rid of the black guys.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Beverage tax is in! But they shut down H St street car another anti business move on Gray's part.

Streetcar funding was restored.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:http://washington.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2010/05/24/daily33.html

Finally some good news from the thieves in the Wilson Building. Vote out the old guard (Barry, Gray, Brown x 2)

The old guard. Hmm, you are showing your klanhood. Councilmember Evans is the longest standing member of the DC Council. Michael Brown has been on the council for less than two years and Kwame Brown is only in his second term. Mendelson, Catania and Graham have served much longer than Gray, who has only been the chairman since 2007 and was elected to office for the first time in 2004. However, none of that matters as you and your other shadow Klan members on this thread are so happy to get rid of all the Blacks. And where pray tell would you like for all the Blacks, and I will just throw in the darker Latinos to go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But, how? Those people who don't work are the ones who vote Barry and the like on to the city Council. And, now they are tax carzy with the bag tax and the thankfully-sut-down beverage tax.

Oh, and the bag fee was sponsored by Tommy Wells, but he is a white guy from Alabama, so I guess it is okay. BTW, if your lazy ass could put two bags in your car when you go to the grocery store, you would not have to pay an extra ten cents. But, you need that ten cents to purchase your $6 latte.

[Anonymous]

Excuse me, 12:08. First, there is not need to call me a lazy ass because I do not agree with the bag tax. For what it is worth, I carried recyclable bags before it was required. I don't agree with excess taxing. Second, I did not say anything about skin color. You brought that up.

Hope it made you feel better to be assumptive and curse at an anonymous person. You should be ashamed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But, how? Those people who don't work are the ones who vote Barry and the like on to the city Council. And, now they are tax carzy with the bag tax and the thankfully-sut-down beverage tax.

Oh, and the bag fee was sponsored by Tommy Wells, but he is a white guy from Alabama, so I guess it is okay. BTW, if your lazy ass could put two bags in your car when you go to the grocery store, you would not have to pay an extra ten cents. But, you need that ten cents to purchase your $6 latte.

I'm not the poster you are talking to, but you are way out of line.

just because someone opposes the bag tax doesn't mean they don't recycle. And opposing certain candidates does not mean you are white. I find your prejudices pretty disturbing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:But, how? Those people who don't work are the ones who vote Barry and the like on to the city Council. And, now they are tax carzy with the bag tax and the thankfully-sut-down beverage tax.

"These people"? They don't work and the ones who vote for Barry. You don't even try to hide your racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Excuse me, 12:08. First, there is not need to call me a lazy ass because I do not agree with the bag tax. For what it is worth, I carried recyclable bags before it was required. I don't agree with excess taxing. Second, I did not say anything about skin color. You brought that up.

Hope it made you feel better to be assumptive and curse at an anonymous person. You should be ashamed.

No I am not ashamed. You should be ashamed. You are lazy and selfish if you find that an extra tenor fifteen cents on your sixty-dollar grocery bill is an excess taxing. You don't need to get the bag. You can choose to carry your own bag or walk out of the store with your purchases in your hand. But, to call it a tax is disingenuous. You say you carried recycleable bags prior to the bag fee. You are paying a fee for the bag, just as you paid a fee for your milk. Do you really think those bags cost nothing prior to the fee. They cost plenty. The materials to create the bag. The cost to transport the bag. And the cost to the damage in the environment when the bags end up in the streams, rivers, gutters and sewers. Their was always a cost, now the city is making consumers pay for a small portion of the cost. Whine, whine, whine.

As for the skin color, well you chimed in with the other posters about the racial makeup of the city council. Therefore, you were tacitly implicit with their sentiments and now you know that it was Tommy Wells and not perhaps Kwame Brown who engineered the bag [b]fee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But, how? Those people who don't work are the ones who vote Barry and the like on to the city Council. And, now they are tax carzy with the bag tax and the thankfully-sut-down beverage tax.

Oh, and the bag fee was sponsored by Tommy Wells, but he is a white guy from Alabama, so I guess it is okay. BTW, if your lazy ass could put two bags in your car when you go to the grocery store, you would not have to pay an extra ten cents. But, you need that ten cents to purchase your $6 latte.

I'm not the poster you are talking to, but you are way out of line.

just because someone opposes the bag tax doesn't mean they don't recycle. And opposing certain candidates does not mean you are white. I find your prejudices pretty disturbing.

Oh you find my posts disturbing. OFLMAO. Of course, you could not possibly find the prior posts disturbing. Dismissed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But, how? Those people who don't work are the ones who vote Barry and the like on to the city Council. And, now they are tax carzy with the bag tax and the thankfully-sut-down beverage tax.

Oh, and the bag fee was sponsored by Tommy Wells, but he is a white guy from Alabama, so I guess it is okay. BTW, if your lazy ass could put two bags in your car when you go to the grocery store, you would not have to pay an extra ten cents. But, you need that ten cents to purchase your $6 latte.

I'm not the poster you are talking to, but you are way out of line.

just because someone opposes the bag tax doesn't mean they don't recycle. And opposing certain candidates does not mean you are white. I find your prejudices pretty disturbing.

You did not find those people disturbing. You did not find those people who vote for Barry are tax crazy disturbing. Well, your post speaks for itself and how you selectively find things racists and disturbing. Hmm, interesting