Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's impossible to know what to think without knowing what was produced. I could see a situation where Taylor produced something very damaging as part of a deal, and then Freedman withdrew the subpoenas and Venable withdrew their motion.

I could also see a situation where Taylor produced basically nothing and it's the same outcome.

I think Freedman would claim victory either way, which is part of his job here.

So this is a wait and see for me. It doesn't look *good* for Blake but I continue not to understand what Swift has to do with anything in the actual lawsuit so I don't really get how it's bad for her either. But who knows.

You can’t understand that Taylor issuing a statement of support for Blake would have a huge impact on public opinion around this case? It would quite literally be a game changer.

I guess? I am primarily interested in the legal side, and I don't see how any info she could produce would help or hurt either one because, by her own admission, she wasn't really involved. I get that her name grabs headlines but beyond that I don't see the relevancy. I don't care about her friendship with Blake.

Part of the narrative they want to establish on Blake is that she is a liar. They want as much evidence of this before her deposition. According to DM, Taylor gave them exactly that. They want to impeach Blake’s credibility and show that she is a pathological liar, which let’s be honest is exactly what she is.

I also think it’s interesting that no one believes her. When Scarjo was asked about the lawsuit she burst into laughter. Countless comedians have made fun of her. Heck even Ryan has. The truth is no one would be laughing and joking if they thought her claims were serious. I think it’s pretty clear her claims are widely viewed as frivolous except amongst the most naive of 60 somethings and those with some sort of business relationship with Blake and Ryan.

Sure they want to establish that she's a liar. But they more specifically want to show she is lying about the SH. Which is not something Taylor is likely to know. You'd think they'd be focusing a lot more on witnesses who were actually on set and could testify "no, Justin didn't do these things." Like if it's all lies, what do you even need Swift for? It should come out from witness testimony.

Also, the "lie" they are supposedly catching Blake in regarding Taylor is that Blake overstated Taylor's involvement in the movie. Which she may have! But Blake never said "yes Taylor co-produced this movie, she wrote several scenes, she was on set all the time." She said vague stuff like "Taylor was with me every step of the way." Yes, it sounds like that was misleading or an exaggeration, but it's such a vague statement that it can't really be a lie. I guess it's impeaching? But it seems like a reach honestly.

I think the focus on Taylor is pretty much entirely about trying to expose the rift between Taylor and Blake and just make this process extra embarrassing and unpleasant for Blake to push a settlement. Which actually makes me think there is probably something to her SH allegations, enough that Baldoni would like to limit focus on it.

[Anonymous]

714 pages on these rich losers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's impossible to know what to think without knowing what was produced. I could see a situation where Taylor produced something very damaging as part of a deal, and then Freedman withdrew the subpoenas and Venable withdrew their motion.

I could also see a situation where Taylor produced basically nothing and it's the same outcome.

I think Freedman would claim victory either way, which is part of his job here.

So this is a wait and see for me. It doesn't look *good* for Blake but I continue not to understand what Swift has to do with anything in the actual lawsuit so I don't really get how it's bad for her either. But who knows.

You can’t understand that Taylor issuing a statement of support for Blake would have a huge impact on public opinion around this case? It would quite literally be a game changer.

I guess? I am primarily interested in the legal side, and I don't see how any info she could produce would help or hurt either one because, by her own admission, she wasn't really involved. I get that her name grabs headlines but beyond that I don't see the relevancy. I don't care about her friendship with Blake.

Part of the narrative they want to establish on Blake is that she is a liar. They want as much evidence of this before her deposition. According to DM, Taylor gave them exactly that. They want to impeach Blake’s credibility and show that she is a pathological liar, which let’s be honest is exactly what she is.

I also think it’s interesting that no one believes her. When Scarjo was asked about the lawsuit she burst into laughter. Countless comedians have made fun of her. Heck even Ryan has. The truth is no one would be laughing and joking if they thought her claims were serious. I think it’s pretty clear her claims are widely viewed as frivolous except amongst the most naive of 60 somethings and those with some sort of business relationship with Blake and Ryan.

Sure they want to establish that she's a liar. But they more specifically want to show she is lying about the SH. Which is not something Taylor is likely to know. You'd think they'd be focusing a lot more on witnesses who were actually on set and could testify "no, Justin didn't do these things." Like if it's all lies, what do you even need Swift for? It should come out from witness testimony.

Also, the "lie" they are supposedly catching Blake in regarding Taylor is that Blake overstated Taylor's involvement in the movie. Which she may have! But Blake never said "yes Taylor co-produced this movie, she wrote several scenes, she was on set all the time." She said vague stuff like "Taylor was with me every step of the way." Yes, it sounds like that was misleading or an exaggeration, but it's such a vague statement that it can't really be a lie. I guess it's impeaching? But it seems like a reach honestly.

I think the focus on Taylor is pretty much entirely about trying to expose the rift between Taylor and Blake and just make this process extra embarrassing and unpleasant for Blake to push a settlement. Which actually makes me think there is probably something to her SH allegations, enough that Baldoni would like to limit focus on it.

The problem is, people love Taylor and if Blake was sexually harassed, they would believe Taylor would never abandon her.

Since Taylor has never publicly supported her even a little bit, it looks bad for Blake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's impossible to know what to think without knowing what was produced. I could see a situation where Taylor produced something very damaging as part of a deal, and then Freedman withdrew the subpoenas and Venable withdrew their motion.

I could also see a situation where Taylor produced basically nothing and it's the same outcome.

I think Freedman would claim victory either way, which is part of his job here.

So this is a wait and see for me. It doesn't look *good* for Blake but I continue not to understand what Swift has to do with anything in the actual lawsuit so I don't really get how it's bad for her either. But who knows.

You can’t understand that Taylor issuing a statement of support for Blake would have a huge impact on public opinion around this case? It would quite literally be a game changer.

I guess? I am primarily interested in the legal side, and I don't see how any info she could produce would help or hurt either one because, by her own admission, she wasn't really involved. I get that her name grabs headlines but beyond that I don't see the relevancy. I don't care about her friendship with Blake.

Part of the narrative they want to establish on Blake is that she is a liar. They want as much evidence of this before her deposition. According to DM, Taylor gave them exactly that. They want to impeach Blake’s credibility and show that she is a pathological liar, which let’s be honest is exactly what she is.

I also think it’s interesting that no one believes her. When Scarjo was asked about the lawsuit she burst into laughter. Countless comedians have made fun of her. Heck even Ryan has. The truth is no one would be laughing and joking if they thought her claims were serious. I think it’s pretty clear her claims are widely viewed as frivolous except amongst the most naive of 60 somethings and those with some sort of business relationship with Blake and Ryan.

Sure they want to establish that she's a liar. But they more specifically want to show she is lying about the SH. Which is not something Taylor is likely to know. You'd think they'd be focusing a lot more on witnesses who were actually on set and could testify "no, Justin didn't do these things." Like if it's all lies, what do you even need Swift for? It should come out from witness testimony.

Also, the "lie" they are supposedly catching Blake in regarding Taylor is that Blake overstated Taylor's involvement in the movie. Which she may have! But Blake never said "yes Taylor co-produced this movie, she wrote several scenes, she was on set all the time." She said vague stuff like "Taylor was with me every step of the way." Yes, it sounds like that was misleading or an exaggeration, but it's such a vague statement that it can't really be a lie. I guess it's impeaching? But it seems like a reach honestly.

I think the focus on Taylor is pretty much entirely about trying to expose the rift between Taylor and Blake and just make this process extra embarrassing and unpleasant for Blake to push a settlement. Which actually makes me think there is probably something to her SH allegations, enough that Baldoni would like to limit focus on it.

The problem is, people love Taylor and if Blake was sexually harassed, they would believe Taylor would never abandon her.

Since Taylor has never publicly supported her even a little bit, it looks bad for Blake.

Sure, if you don't care about the legal aspects of this case and just read tabloids and substitute Taylor Swift's judgment for you own, great.

None of that is actually relevant to the legal case and it's not "truth" or "justice." It's just vibes. That's fine for PR people but it's not good enough for lawyers, and it's also very similar to what happened in Depp/Heard, where Depp convinced people Heard was a crazy liar and won, even though he quite obviously is an abuser (and this even if she's got mental health issues and did lots of bad stuff, she didn't defame him in her op ed).

Sorry but it just looks like a witch hunt to me. Did Baldoni sexually harass Blake and try to retaliate against her or not? That's the only question for me here. Taylor is irrelevant to that IMO.

[Anonymous]

A Friday morning of backwards somersaults and contorted twists and turns to defend Lively at all costs.

Let’s hope that something big is on the docket today that brings the lawsuits more clear focus.

Everyone already knows BL lies, has lied, was proven to have lied about SH details and others regarding IEWU. Let’s just hope that Lyman is ready with orders soon so that we can move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blake has lost Deux Moi which I never thought would happen. Shes an anonymous gossip podcaster that has a huge Instagram and newsletter following. Taylor‘s team goes to her. She’s always been very positive about Blake, even commenting before this lawsuit that she is scared of Blake and her people so “I would never say anything bad lol.”

She’s supported Blake. She has said she thinks that she was actually harassed. On her show this week, she is now reporting that Blake and Ryan are completely isolated from any friends that they shared with Taylor and that group. And that Taylor is done and plans to never speak to Blake again. The falling out of course started with the dragons text, and has escalated over the last few months, ending completely with the extortion attempt which is above and beyond anything Taylor ever imagined from her - and they’re no longer speaking and likely will not again.

I think anybody who’s even remotely close to Taylor will continue to distance themselves from Blake and Ryan.

They’re both Hollywood has-beens. I’m sure there are various investigative reporters working on exposes right now detailing what monsters they’ve been to people for the last 10 or 15 years. Maybe 20 or 25 years since Ryan is so old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has lost Deux Moi which I never thought would happen. Shes an anonymous gossip podcaster that has a huge Instagram and newsletter following. Taylor‘s team goes to her. She’s always been very positive about Blake, even commenting before this lawsuit that she is scared of Blake and her people so “I would never say anything bad lol.”

She’s supported Blake. She has said she thinks that she was actually harassed. On her show this week, she is now reporting that Blake and Ryan are completely isolated from any friends that they shared with Taylor and that group. And that Taylor is done and plans to never speak to Blake again. The falling out of course started with the dragons text, and has escalated over the last few months, ending completely with the extortion attempt which is above and beyond anything Taylor ever imagined from her - and they’re no longer speaking and likely will not again.

I think anybody who’s even remotely close to Taylor will continue to distance themselves from Blake and Ryan.

They’re both Hollywood has-beens. I’m sure there are various investigative reporters working on exposes right now detailing what monsters they’ve been to people for the last 10 or 15 years. Maybe 20 or 25 years since Ryan is so old.

I saw a blind reveal yesterday that alleged Ryan was having an affair with his personal assistant and the marriage is barely alive at this point. The gloves are definitely off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's impossible to know what to think without knowing what was produced. I could see a situation where Taylor produced something very damaging as part of a deal, and then Freedman withdrew the subpoenas and Venable withdrew their motion.

I could also see a situation where Taylor produced basically nothing and it's the same outcome.

I think Freedman would claim victory either way, which is part of his job here.

So this is a wait and see for me. It doesn't look *good* for Blake but I continue not to understand what Swift has to do with anything in the actual lawsuit so I don't really get how it's bad for her either. But who knows.

You can’t understand that Taylor issuing a statement of support for Blake would have a huge impact on public opinion around this case? It would quite literally be a game changer.

I guess? I am primarily interested in the legal side, and I don't see how any info she could produce would help or hurt either one because, by her own admission, she wasn't really involved. I get that her name grabs headlines but beyond that I don't see the relevancy. I don't care about her friendship with Blake.

Part of the narrative they want to establish on Blake is that she is a liar. They want as much evidence of this before her deposition. According to DM, Taylor gave them exactly that. They want to impeach Blake’s credibility and show that she is a pathological liar, which let’s be honest is exactly what she is.

I also think it’s interesting that no one believes her. When Scarjo was asked about the lawsuit she burst into laughter. Countless comedians have made fun of her. Heck even Ryan has. The truth is no one would be laughing and joking if they thought her claims were serious. I think it’s pretty clear her claims are widely viewed as frivolous except amongst the most naive of 60 somethings and those with some sort of business relationship with Blake and Ryan.

Sure they want to establish that she's a liar. But they more specifically want to show she is lying about the SH. Which is not something Taylor is likely to know. You'd think they'd be focusing a lot more on witnesses who were actually on set and could testify "no, Justin didn't do these things." Like if it's all lies, what do you even need Swift for? It should come out from witness testimony.

Also, the "lie" they are supposedly catching Blake in regarding Taylor is that Blake overstated Taylor's involvement in the movie. Which she may have! But Blake never said "yes Taylor co-produced this movie, she wrote several scenes, she was on set all the time." She said vague stuff like "Taylor was with me every step of the way." Yes, it sounds like that was misleading or an exaggeration, but it's such a vague statement that it can't really be a lie. I guess it's impeaching? But it seems like a reach honestly.

I think the focus on Taylor is pretty much entirely about trying to expose the rift between Taylor and Blake and just make this process extra embarrassing and unpleasant for Blake to push a settlement. Which actually makes me think there is probably something to her SH allegations, enough that Baldoni would like to limit focus on it.

The[b] problem is, people love Taylor and if Blake was sexually harassed, they would believe Taylor would never abandon he

Since Taylor has never publicly supported her even a little bit, it looks bad for Blake.

Exactly this, even her best friend doesn’t believe her allegations. Why should strangers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has lost Deux Moi which I never thought would happen. Shes an anonymous gossip podcaster that has a huge Instagram and newsletter following. Taylor‘s team goes to her. She’s always been very positive about Blake, even commenting before this lawsuit that she is scared of Blake and her people so “I would never say anything bad lol.”

She’s supported Blake. She has said she thinks that she was actually harassed. On her show this week, she is now reporting that Blake and Ryan are completely isolated from any friends that they shared with Taylor and that group. And that Taylor is done and plans to never speak to Blake again. The falling out of course started with the dragons text, and has escalated over the last few months, ending completely with the extortion attempt which is above and beyond anything Taylor ever imagined from her - and they’re no longer speaking and likely will not again.

I think anybody who’s even remotely close to Taylor will continue to distance themselves from Blake and Ryan.

They’re both Hollywood has-beens. I’m sure there are various investigative reporters working on exposes right now detailing what monsters they’ve been to people for the last 10 or 15 years. Maybe 20 or 25 years since Ryan is so old.

I saw a blind reveal yesterday that alleged Ryan was having an affair with his personal assistant and the marriage is barely alive at this point. The gloves are definitely off.

I saw this too. This couple has really been protected from any kind of press like this for the last 15 years, including during their affair on Green Lantern. Completely agree that the gloves are off and this is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of stuff that’s going to come out about them. People now feel emboldened and they are coming forward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has lost Deux Moi which I never thought would happen. Shes an anonymous gossip podcaster that has a huge Instagram and newsletter following. Taylor‘s team goes to her. She’s always been very positive about Blake, even commenting before this lawsuit that she is scared of Blake and her people so “I would never say anything bad lol.”

She’s supported Blake. She has said she thinks that she was actually harassed. On her show this week, she is now reporting that Blake and Ryan are completely isolated from any friends that they shared with Taylor and that group. And that Taylor is done and plans to never speak to Blake again. The falling out of course started with the dragons text, and has escalated over the last few months, ending completely with the extortion attempt which is above and beyond anything Taylor ever imagined from her - and they’re no longer speaking and likely will not again.

I think anybody who’s even remotely close to Taylor will continue to distance themselves from Blake and Ryan.

They’re both Hollywood has-beens. I’m sure there are various investigative reporters working on exposes right now detailing what monsters they’ve been to people for the last 10 or 15 years. Maybe 20 or 25 years since Ryan is so old.

I saw a blind reveal yesterday that alleged Ryan was having an affair with his personal assistant and the marriage is barely alive at this point. The gloves are definitely off.

Male assistant? Otherwise prob fake leak smoke screen by his zesty ass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blake has lost Deux Moi which I never thought would happen. Shes an anonymous gossip podcaster that has a huge Instagram and newsletter following. Taylor‘s team goes to her. She’s always been very positive about Blake, even commenting before this lawsuit that she is scared of Blake and her people so “I would never say anything bad lol.”

She’s supported Blake. She has said she thinks that she was actually harassed. On her show this week, she is now reporting that Blake and Ryan are completely isolated from any friends that they shared with Taylor and that group. And that Taylor is done and plans to never speak to Blake again. The falling out of course started with the dragons text, and has escalated over the last few months, ending completely with the extortion attempt which is above and beyond anything Taylor ever imagined from her - and they’re no longer speaking and likely will not again.

I think anybody who’s even remotely close to Taylor will continue to distance themselves from Blake and Ryan.

They’re both Hollywood has-beens. I’m sure there are various investigative reporters working on exposes right now detailing what monsters they’ve been to people for the last 10 or 15 years. Maybe 20 or 25 years since Ryan is so old.

I saw a blind reveal yesterday that alleged Ryan was having an affair with his personal assistant and the marriage is barely alive at this point. The gloves are definitely off.

I saw this too. This couple has really been protected from any kind of press like this for the last 15 years, including during their affair on Green Lantern. Completely agree that the gloves are off and this is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of stuff that’s going to come out about them. People now feel emboldened and they are coming forward.

Sharks sense blood in the water. This means even Ari has prob given up protecting them too.

[Anonymous]

I see Ryan and his team cutting bait and choreographing Blake taking all the blame — even though he’s clearly the mastermind of this entire thing and ran point on it. Both of their careers should be over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is spinning going on for sure, but it's on Baldoni's side.

Last week, Freedman alleged that Blake Lively had asked Taylor Swift to delete evidence from her phone, and that Blake's lawyer threatened to release embarrassing things about Taylor if Taylor didn't release a supportive statement for Blake. Freedman claimed that THIS was the reason for his subpoenas of Swift and her lawyer.

But now, Freedman is telling the Daily Mail and TMZ that they "got what they needed." Only... suddenly there is no reference at all to those allegations of threats and spoliation of evidence. Here's TMZ:

Sources with direct knowledge tell us ... Baldoni's side dropped the subpoena after information was voluntarily provided to them.
Other sources, also in the know, say this "confirms the validity of the statement made last week that Taylor's involvement with this film was licensing a song.”

So suddenly the thing Freedman and Baldoni were trying to prove with their multiple subpoenas of Swift and her legal team was... that Swift was not directly involved in making this movie?

What does that have to do with this lawsuit? How does it show that Baldoni didn't SH Blake or try to retaliate against her? How does it prove Baldoni's defamation or extortion claims?

Blake has claimed all along that Taylor has nothing to do with this case and that focus on her is a distraction from the actual claims. And now today Freedman is claiming, victoriously, that they've just received evidence that proves Taylor Swift has nothing to do with this case. Congrats, dude?

Nothing about Lively's case rests on Taylor Swift. I'm sure whatever is going on with their friendship is important to Blake and who even knows, but from a legal perspective, it's irrelevant. The only person tryin to drag Taylor into this case was Baldoni, and now he's claiming that he was only trying to drag her in for the purposes of showing it has nothing to do with her?

Please.

https://pagesix.com/2025/05/22/celebrity-news/taylor-swift-wishes-she-never-met-blake-lively-after-justin-baldoni-drama-report/?_gl=1*176criv*_ga*NjcyMDQxNzE3LjE3NDgwMDc2OTU.*_ga_0DZ7LHF5PZ*czE3NDgwMDc2OTQkbzEkZzEkdDE3NDgwMDc4MzIkajE5JGwwJGgwJGRjT0FwSk9YOWFhdVlpSEhTTlN6TlZmY2J6djFDVzN6NGZn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's impossible to know what to think without knowing what was produced. I could see a situation where Taylor produced something very damaging as part of a deal, and then Freedman withdrew the subpoenas and Venable withdrew their motion.

I could also see a situation where Taylor produced basically nothing and it's the same outcome.

I think Freedman would claim victory either way, which is part of his job here.

So this is a wait and see for me. It doesn't look *good* for Blake but I continue not to understand what Swift has to do with anything in the actual lawsuit so I don't really get how it's bad for her either. But who knows.

You can’t understand that Taylor issuing a statement of support for Blake would have a huge impact on public opinion around this case? It would quite literally be a game changer.

I guess? I am primarily interested in the legal side, and I don't see how any info she could produce would help or hurt either one because, by her own admission, she wasn't really involved. I get that her name grabs headlines but beyond that I don't see the relevancy. I don't care about her friendship with Blake.

Part of the narrative they want to establish on Blake is that she is a liar. They want as much evidence of this before her deposition. According to DM, Taylor gave them exactly that. They want to impeach Blake’s credibility and show that she is a pathological liar, which let’s be honest is exactly what she is.

I also think it’s interesting that no one believes her. When Scarjo was asked about the lawsuit she burst into laughter. Countless comedians have made fun of her. Heck even Ryan has. The truth is no one would be laughing and joking if they thought her claims were serious. I think it’s pretty clear her claims are widely viewed as frivolous except amongst the most naive of 60 somethings and those with some sort of business relationship with Blake and Ryan.

Sure they want to establish that she's a liar. But they more specifically want to show she is lying about the SH. Which is not something Taylor is likely to know. You'd think they'd be focusing a lot more on witnesses who were actually on set and could testify "no, Justin didn't do these things." Like if it's all lies, what do you even need Swift for? It should come out from witness testimony.

Also, the "lie" they are supposedly catching Blake in regarding Taylor is that Blake overstated Taylor's involvement in the movie. Which she may have! But Blake never said "yes Taylor co-produced this movie, she wrote several scenes, she was on set all the time." She said vague stuff like "Taylor was with me every step of the way." Yes, it sounds like that was misleading or an exaggeration, but it's such a vague statement that it can't really be a lie. I guess it's impeaching? But it seems like a reach honestly.

I think the focus on Taylor is pretty much entirely about trying to expose the rift between Taylor and Blake and just make this process extra embarrassing and unpleasant for Blake to push a settlement. Which actually makes me think there is probably something to her SH allegations, enough that Baldoni would like to limit focus on it.

The problem is, people love Taylor and if Blake was sexually harassed, they would believe Taylor would never abandon her.

Since Taylor has never publicly supported her even a little bit, it looks bad for Blake.

Sure, if you don't care about the legal aspects of this case and just read tabloids and substitute Taylor Swift's judgment for you own, great.

None of that is actually relevant to the legal case and it's not "truth" or "justice." It's just vibes. That's fine for PR people but it's not good enough for lawyers, and it's also very similar to what happened in Depp/Heard, where Depp convinced people Heard was a crazy liar and won, even though he quite obviously is an abuser (and this even if she's got mental health issues and did lots of bad stuff, she didn't defame him in her op ed).

Sorry but it just looks like a witch hunt to me. Did Baldoni sexually harass Blake and try to retaliate against her or not? That's the only question for me here. Taylor is irrelevant to that IMO.

BF can walk and chew gum at the same time. SH is BL’s claim, and they have already shared tons of evidence disproving that. Sources also say there’s tons more because the cameras never stopped rolling. There’s also an independent investigation right now where witnesses are being interviewed.

But that’s just one claim. Justin is also alleging civil extortion and Taylor was name dropped a lot in BL’s efforts to steal the movie.

You should leave the lawyering to BF. He knows what he’s doing. Your attempt to spin the Taylor angle as a distraction and indicator of guilt is crazy. I think it’s also a sign that Blake supporters are panicking. Pretty much every media outlet has turned against her and more and more people are now comfortable coming out talking about how horrible she is.

[Anonymous]

I don’t really know or understand wtf is going on. It does sound to me like Swift is breaking all ties with Luvely and doesn’t want to be involved in her narrative anymore. But I still very much distrust Bryan Freedman, and I’ll just wait to see what happens with the legal filings.