So this is where it gets interesting. What smarter people tell me is they can't keep him off the ballot, requirements are set by the Home Rule Charter and can't be made stricter administratively. However, since he's violating the terms of the public financing they can probably make him give back all the money he got, even what he's already spent. My understanding is he had spent over $250,000 when he withdrew. So that needs to be returned -- or he's personally liable.
I suppose he could try to get the Council to change the law on an emergency basis. Again.
|