ACPS - K-2 language arts curriculum

[Anonymous]

Does anyone know if ACPS has already or will be transitioning away from F&P and Lucy Calkins literacy curriculum for K-2 language arts? And if ACPS will be transitioning - how soon will it be? I believe that FCPS has moved to Science of Reading and DRA.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/22/us/reading-teaching-curriculum-phonics.html

https://www.apmreports.org/story/2021/11/19/fountas-pinnell-disproven-childrens-reading-theory

Despite the scientific evidence showing that the language arts strategies and methods that rely on context are not the best fit for many students, I know that school districts are slow to change.

[Anonymous]

Lucy Calkins is an absolute idiot as are the school systems who fell for her crappy program and continued to use it even when year after year they produced more and more students who couldn’t read.

[Anonymous]

Why don't you just call the school and ask?

[Anonymous]

Arlington County is - they are adopting a new ELA curriculum based on the science of reading. Fairfax County is doing the same. Perhaps email your super intendant’s office to see if Alexandria is.

[Anonymous]

This is OP. I have asked and can’t get a straight answer. I don’t want to press because I don’t want to be perceived as someone who is anti-CRT (I know it’s not the same but questioning curriculum choice is adjacent to this). I’m not against the Lucy Calkins curriculum per se, the writing component is supposedly fine, I just want to know so I can supplement with phonemic awareness lessons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is OP. I have asked and can’t get a straight answer. I don’t want to press because I don’t want to be perceived as someone who is anti-CRT (I know it’s not the same but questioning curriculum choice is adjacent to this). I’m not against the Lucy Calkins curriculum per se, the writing component is supposedly fine, I just want to know so I can supplement with phonemic awareness lessons.

The answer to this question is supposed to be yes - ACPS adopted Really Great Reading this year. The central office person in charge of this is Dr. Carolyn Wooster: https://www.acps.k12.va.us/Page/2391

[Anonymous]

I would just plan to supplement no matter what. Even if they are changing curriculum, it is going to take time for teachers to adjust to the new methods.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is OP. I have asked and can’t get a straight answer. I don’t want to press because I don’t want to be perceived as someone who is anti-CRT (I know it’s not the same but questioning curriculum choice is adjacent to this). I’m not against the Lucy Calkins curriculum per se, the writing component is supposedly fine, I just want to know so I can supplement with phonemic awareness lessons.

The answer to this question is supposed to be yes - ACPS adopted Really Great Reading this year. The central office person in charge of this is Dr. Carolyn Wooster: https://www.acps.k12.va.us/Page/2391

This is true…

Would like to keep both - systematic phonics instruction is 30 minutes at the most and (big secret) it’s kind of boring for your early readers…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is OP. I have asked and can’t get a straight answer. I don’t want to press because I don’t want to be perceived as someone who is anti-CRT (I know it’s not the same but questioning curriculum choice is adjacent to this). I’m not against the Lucy Calkins curriculum per se, the writing component is supposedly fine, I just want to know so I can supplement with phonemic awareness lessons.

What does one thing have to do with another? You will have bigger issues with your school down the road if you feel like asking legitimate questions about curriculum will make you a pariah. It also says something about the school that asking a basic question one time did not yield a straightforward answer.