Is saying “corporations are sociopathic” a Qanon thing?

[Anonymous]

I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

[Anonymous]

It’s just plain dumb. Corporations are legal entities. Just that. People are sociopathic, some apparently are also stupid

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s just plain dumb. Corporations are legal entities. Just that. People are sociopathic, some apparently are also stupid

Actually, according to right wing doofus John Roberts, corporations are people. Remember?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

Recent World Bank and Climate protesters would definitely agree that corporations are sociopathic (and evil).

[Anonymous]

Eh, that’s Chomskyese

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

It's an objective observation thing. When you put profit and shareholder value over human rights, the environment, worker safety, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, I don't think "sociopathic" is an unfair conclusion to draw.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

It's an objective observation thing. When you put profit and shareholder value over human rights, the environment, worker safety, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, I don't think "sociopathic" is an unfair conclusion to draw.

+1
“What’s the poisoning of a few billion people with durable, fire retardant molecules if you got to make some money?” is sociopathic. Actually it’s psychopathic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

It's an objective observation thing. When you put profit and shareholder value over human rights, the environment, worker safety, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, I don't think "sociopathic" is an unfair conclusion to draw.

+1
“What’s the poisoning of a few billion people with durable, fire retardant molecules if you got to make some money?” is sociopathic. Actually it’s psychopathic.

Agreed. Shareholders aren’t the only stakeholders for a company, but acting as if they are is how our society gets wrecked.

[Anonymous]

Why are we defending rich corporations now? Seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why are we defending rich corporations now? Seriously?

The fascists have the media on their side and they’re getting bold, so yes, the GOP is defending corporations now. Corporations are people too and we don’t wan them to get their feelings hurt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we defending rich corporations now? Seriously?

The fascists have the media on their side and they’re getting bold, so yes, the GOP is defending corporations now. Corporations are people too and we don’t wan them to get their feelings hurt.

Unless it’s Disney.

[Anonymous]

I'm left of Trotsky and think that anyone who believes in Q should be committed to a mental institution but I definitely think corporations are sociopathic.

Just Google "Nestle formula Africa," "Union Carbide Bhopal," "tobacco company cancer coverup," or literally thousands of other examples of corporations putting their profits ahead of human life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are we defending rich corporations now? Seriously?

The fascists have the media on their side and they’re getting bold, so yes, the GOP is defending corporations now. Corporations are people too and we don’t wan them to get their feelings hurt.

Unless it’s Disney.

I think Disney sucks, but they’re on the side of right here and you know it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

It's an objective observation thing. When you put profit and shareholder value over human rights, the environment, worker safety, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, I don't think "sociopathic" is an unfair conclusion to draw.

This is my assumption. It's an acknowledgement that a corporation exists to produce profit without consideration of morality or social consequences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a former friend who went far of the deep end. Don’t know who they voted for but they post a lot of far-right and far, far left stuff on Facebook, often contradictory. Anyway, they say “corporations are sociopathic,” “corporations are sick,” etc.

It's an objective observation thing. When you put profit and shareholder value over human rights, the environment, worker safety, etc. etc. etc. ad nauseum, I don't think "sociopathic" is an unfair conclusion to draw.

This is my assumption. It's an acknowledgement that a corporation exists to produce profit without consideration of morality or social consequences.

+1! Green knows no morals.