MCPS has been busing for decades. Maybe you didn't notice? |
Elrich is (was?) a member of DSA. The council made MoCO a sanctuary county. Both Elrich and the council passed the social justice and racial equity bill. MCPS is introducing elements of critical theory into the curriculum. These are all far left. |
They've done a little around the edges. But in 2018/19 there was a big push for countywide busing. Thankfully the 2021 BOE doesn't seem as interested. But we'll keep an eye on them. |
"especially" means pushing for county wide busing? That's not how I read it, but ok. |
+1 I don't support Elrich, but the bag tax is not just MoCo. This is actually a good idea, IMO. And $15 minimum wage is a decent thing to do in a high col area. I guess Rs don't agree with livable wages and hate poor people, but I already knew that. |
No, there wasn't. Please limit your spamming to the MCPS forum? |
Thankfully that's not how the 2021 BOE read it either. But to deny than the 2018/19 BOE was gunning for busing is disingenuous. Pro-busers would actually say "We don't want busing. We just want schools to be better balanced demographically and if kids have to attend schools farther from home, that's OK." This is a BOE member Dixon paraphrase BTW. |
What? |
"further away" <> "countywide busing". It may, however, mean adjacent clusters. We have that now, pre-the word "especially". Look at the Churchill and Wootton cluster maps. https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/04602map.pdf https://ww2.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/04234map.pdf |
Again, semantics. I really wish people would stop calling it socialism because people start arguing how it is/is not socialism. Whatever it is, it's just ineffective government, inefficient government, irresponsible spending (yay we get two more people on the county council likely with nothing original to say), and not creating an environment that's competitive with DC or other surrounding jurisdictions. I don't understand the status quo folks. If you're not moving forward, then you're moving backwards, because everyone else is not content with standing pat. |
It might be semantics, but that doesn't mean it's unimportant. Even OP agreed that it's not socialism. |
Do you know what countywide means? |
I absolutely agree with this. Basically since the financial crisis (and actually even a little bit before), this county has been horribly mismanaged. Run into the ground by people who seem to prefer posturing over the hard work of governing. People who think that subsidizing developers is economic development. People who love to talk about how rich we are as a reason why we can afford their pet cause, while we gradually get poorer and poorer. Adjusted for inflation, median household income in 2016 was lower than it was in 1989. That’s a real accomplishment. What worries me the most is that after finally removing the ossified cadre of mediocre electeds who prioritized their own longevity in office over the county. We have only replaced them with what mostly seem to be unserious clowns (excepting Friedson) who have seemingly confused good governance with maximizing engagement on social media. I find the politics of this county to be absolutely childish. Spending 100% of the time trying to figure out how to increase the number of poor residents while totally disinterested in trying to figure out how to improve the number of high wage jobs and make the county more attractive to high wage earners. There is a blasé attitude about wealth and economic growth that borders on arrogance. |
The bond-rating agencies disagree with you. |
And so you agree that "countywide" busing is happening now? Some of those kids in Churchill cluster are being "bused" to Churchill rather than the closest school. |