Implications *no broader than* that publications particular interest (which is subject to change of course)
|
|
Also - reading research data alone tells you plenty. Just read research publications. Look at info reported. Note where it is missing or inconsistent. Dig deeper, validate, cross reference.
I think it is important to know general opinion and community temperature not just in my community but others as well. I find it interesting and it helps me stay objective. |
I think PP knew she was being disingenuous in presenting a false narrative with the bad link. First, she’s not interested in factual accounts but rather in controlling the narrative. And two, if clicking on the link generated revenue (I don’t know if it did), money would have been made. Kind of proves that it doesn’t matter if the news is wrong or not. It’s about money and narrative-facts and truth be damned. |
|
^^ evoke truth and make it more valuable. Greed is not a complicated trait to manipulate. Truth is an existence that has no boundary, yet few pursue it because the process to attain is often uncomfortable. Ans unpredictable. Greed doesn’t like unpredictability. People seek truth for safety and protection. Our human instinct gives us intuition and a brain that constantly checks and builds a habitat for processing truth.
Evoke truth and make it more valuable |
But it’s not necessarily about truth. It’s about $ and being the first to get the story out there to make the most of our limited attention spans and lack of patience. I agree with you, present the facts, what is known, what is unknown, and leave the opinion and spin and controlling the narrative to the Op/Ed page. Unfortunately it’s eliciting emotion that apparently generates revenue. And emotion cares little for truth. |