Kellyanne Conway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:


It's clever of her to spend the pandemic doing all these things.

But she's always been clever, we knew that.

I have a horror of surgery, personally, but it all looks good. I hope she's happy!

Me again. Although I was also fine with the way she looked before. Her face had more character then, and now it's more "feminine". Oh well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have really conflicted feelings about Conway’s new look. She looks glamorous and wonderful but how sad that women give into the pressure not to age. If society can’t let women age, I feel like our society needs to really start pressuring men about their looks! Spread the pain of high expectations to all.

I agree. No one cares that men age.

Or we could let everyone age naturally.

The way you people think is so disturbing. I can't stand Kellyanne for the constant fountain if sh*t that spews from her mouth, but I really could care less what she looks like and find people who support the kind of work she's had done as demented.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

There is nothing wrong with her in the first picture and the fact that people like you uphold this notion of what people need to look like is messed up and leads to people having that self-loathing and pursuing endless ridiculous procedures. That someone would have made that young woman she was feel so bad about herself is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

There is nothing wrong with her in the first picture and the fact that people like you uphold this notion of what people need to look like is messed up and leads to people having that self-loathing and pursuing endless ridiculous procedures. That someone would have made that young woman she was feel so bad about herself is disgusting.

I agree. And when I think about those disgusting "I know, right?" comments from Trump about his own daughter's looks, post-surgery -- ugh, it's just disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

There is nothing wrong with her in the first picture and the fact that people like you uphold this notion of what people need to look like is messed up and leads to people having that self-loathing and pursuing endless ridiculous procedures. That someone would have made that young woman she was feel so bad about herself is disgusting.

You misunderstood my post. Yes, of course she should have never cut up her face. But, when she did, she looked okay at first ... but nature is nature and surgery rarely lasts long. So, it's both painful disfigurement and usually pretty pointless, in the long run.

[Anonymous]

Watching her interview about Bolton to see if her mouth still goes sideways when she talks (as did Sarah's). But what really surprised me is that she is speaking in actual paragraphs. Of course, this is on Fox, she might speak differently to CNN. Also wearing something goofy looking (sort of cow girl-ish).

The OP pic is way too stepford looking, but I do get the impression she is angling for a new job or . . . .trying to impress George?

[Anonymous]

She looks hideous. Regardless, you can put lipstick on a pig, but....

[Anonymous]

Kellyanne Conway has always reminded me of (RHOA) Kim Zolciak's mother (ACTUALLY named Karen). She is this gristly, shriveled, tanned, dry haired, sour faced woman with collapsed wrinkly lined cheeks- really shockingly homely and just looks evil. So this makeover now that her cheeks aren't concave and saggy is like night and day with her face having normal contours. Not trying to hate on another woman: she needed this surgery.

I googled a couple links: https://www.allabouttrh.com/2012/11/19/kim-zolciaks-mother-speaks-out-says-kim-uses-her-kids-as-pawns-and-blames-bravo-for-family-drama/

https://people.com/tv/kim-zolciak-biermann-estranged-mother-karen-zolciak/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

There is nothing wrong with her in the first picture and the fact that people like you uphold this notion of what people need to look like is messed up and leads to people having that self-loathing and pursuing endless ridiculous procedures. That someone would have made that young woman she was feel so bad about herself is disgusting.

Take it up with her parents who reared her to be the empty, self-hating shell of human willing to slice, dice, and get herself injected every few weeks in order to feel pretty.

And I agree with the other pp who said that it’s weird and fcked up that so many support Kellyanne’s multiple procedures. Why can’t humans look like humans anymore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have really conflicted feelings about Conway’s new look. She looks glamorous and wonderful but how sad that women give into the pressure not to age. If society can’t let women age, I feel like our society needs to really start pressuring men about their looks! Spread the pain of high expectations to all.

She doesn't look younger. She looks better but not younger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

There is nothing wrong with her in the first picture and the fact that people like you uphold this notion of what people need to look like is messed up and leads to people having that self-loathing and pursuing endless ridiculous procedures. That someone would have made that young woman she was feel so bad about herself is disgusting.

Take it up with her parents who reared her to be the empty, self-hating shell of human willing to slice, dice, and get herself injected every few weeks in order to feel pretty.

And I agree with the other pp who said that it’s weird and fcked up that so many support Kellyanne’s multiple procedures. Why can’t humans look like humans anymore?

To be fair, she looked like the exhumed skeleton of a 80 year old at 53. Her "natural aging" was super jacked. Like she spent a lifetime smoking, drinking, sun bathing, and being eaten away from the inside by evil. So for her, even a lot of people who are totally down with humans looking like humans would "get" why someone who aged like her would do this. Heck yeah I would do the same if I looked that tragic at her age. It's a MAJOR improvement.

[Anonymous]

Honestly, I think her old look would not have been so bad without that hair. It really accentuates that aging. As a brunette with decent makeup (e.g., not a ton of mascara and proper blending), I think she probably would have looked fine. The eye bags under the left eye were really the only thing that needed fixing. (She also had a little tendency to wear things that didn't really flatter her shoulder/clavicle area, showing too much skin.) I really don't think she needed the full scale work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes lots of fillers, but if she stops and the clock strikes 12 she’s goes back to a bag face.

This is the problem. They all do this and can look good for a hot minute but nature always wins. Ivanka is a great example.

This is crazy. It has nothing to do with aging. It's self-loathing. She looks nothing like her real self.

Right. But the point is that in the second picture there, she looks nice. Now, a few years later, she can't keep that look and ends up piled under makeup and puffy from injections.

Wow. She looks a lot like Chelsea Clinton in her before. The two of them used to be good friends, both married Jewish men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looks like she also had a lot of fat grafting done during the alleged facelift. Her face had a distinctly sunken appearance beforehand. You can see the volume added to her cheekbones, the smoothing of the lid-cheek junction, the plumping of her lips. That is likely fat.

I'm going with cheekbone implants. I don't think fat injections or fillers give you that kind of lift.