What’s this new “doJ spy” tactic?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Yes, the Trumpsters look desperate. In the same way that they’re worried about Mueller’s “perjury trap” - it’s only perjury if you don’t tell the truth - if you weren’t doing anything illegal, what’s the worry? Oh yeah. You guys treasoned hard. |
Anonymous
|
Since the Trumpies refuse to click through to people who actually know anything, here is Asha’s first tweet on the thread: “EXACTLY. First, there is no such thing as an "informant" in a counterintelligence investigation – the FBI is not trying to find evidence of a crime. It is trying to assess the national security threat posed by suspected foreign agents. The campaign had at least FOUR. 1/ ” In what way might this be the words of a desperate writer? They’re not. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
This puts the Seychelles meeting into better context. |
Anonymous
| I revel in your pathetic misery. |
Anonymous
|
Apparently the only people OK to talk to the Trump campaign are Russian agents.
|
Anonymous
Stop posting this claptrap. Trumputin will lose the next election only if Democrats and all patriotic Americans eager to save our democracy work together to defeat him. The complicit GOP will allow him to rape and pillage our national security and treasury all he wants. They will do nothing to stop him. Ryan and McConnell must be paid by the Russians. |
Anonymous
Who’s paying you to post this garbage, PP? |
Anonymous
What is false about it? |
Anonymous
| So the "operative" is a former GHWB CIA operative who is teaching in London now, and you all want to keep blaming the Democrats? |
Anonymous
The Dems paid for the dossier. |
Anonymous
No bias here. Nope. 
|
Anonymous
Um, doesn't he shake everyone's hand on graduation day? |
Anonymous
| And doesn’t “Perspective” mean it’s an opinion piece? |
Anonymous
Yes. |