S/O Men, be honest....largest size woman you would date?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I prefer to sleep with a guy who knows Melissa has two s's and only one l and that Rosie O'Donnell has two l's at the end of her last name.

Why would anyone care? They're actors. Who cares if they spell their names with two Ps and a silent Q. It's sad I even know who they are.

I don't find it hot when a guy is particular about anything concerning Rosie O'Donnell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I recently had to confront this question. I met a woman on Tinder who really represented herself in the best light weight wise.
When she showed up, I realized she was 30lbs over what the photos indicated. I would say she was 5'5" and 165 lbs

I'm usually attracted to thin, very thin girls. But I had already committed my evening to this woman and I didn't want to be rude so I went with it. The fact that she was significantly younger than me probably helped.

Anyway, after several rounds of very strong drinks, we ended up at her place and WOW. At first I was worried if I would be able to get it up because I was so focused on how overweight she was. But she was so into sex it made the whole thing worth it 3x

Now I think I am into chubby

Or, women that aren't unattractive, young, who are a little overweight and are sexually driven?

+1 Details, details

[Anonymous]

Why does it have to be either or? There are attractive and unattractive women who are a whole range of weights, and whether or not you're attracted to them is personal. As a fairly thin (not skinny) woman it makes me sad to hear that "real" men don't like my body. My husband is real last time I checked and also not a "metrosexual douchebag."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I recently had to confront this question. I met a woman on Tinder who really represented herself in the best light weight wise.
When she showed up, I realized she was 30lbs over what the photos indicated. I would say she was 5'5" and 165 lbs

I'm usually attracted to thin, very thin girls. But I had already committed my evening to this woman and I didn't want to be rude so I went with it. The fact that she was significantly younger than me probably helped.

Anyway, after several rounds of very strong drinks, we ended up at her place and WOW. At first I was worried if I would be able to get it up because I was so focused on how overweight she was. But she was so into sex it made the whole thing worth it 3x

Now I think I am into chubby

"Help! I evaluated a woman based on actually spending time with her instead of her pant size! What can I do to fix this crazy fetish?"

Get a grip, dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My first wife was a size 16/18, about 5'7". I think she was probably about 180ish or so?

She was thick, but she was sexy, too. Lots of curves, big hips, big breasts, just a big, voluptuous woman. She was always self conscious, but I thought she looked fantastic.

I'd much rather be with someone who looked like Kelly Clarkson or Queen Latifah and was confident and sexy, than some bony waif who constantly worried about not eating.

Guys like curves. (Well, REAL guys do. I have no idea what metrosexual douchebags like, as I don't understand them). Look at a sportscar. It's a collection of exaggerated curves. That should tell you something about how men see objects of desire.

Interesting. I'm 174 but a size 14 (and thanks for your post). How big is your current wife?

Ah..the no true sctotsman fallacy..all real men must like fat chicks.



Sorry, most don't prefer that. Curves doesn't mean fat. There are women in the gym who have curves because they work out and have deprived those curves. That's what a lot of men prefer. There are "chubby chasers" but that's not the norm. If it were you'd see modern fat actress, and you don't because no ines really wants to sleep with them. Guys prefer to look at Scarlet Johansson not Mellisa McCarthy or Rosie O'Donnel.

The PP *did* mention that he doesn't understand what metrosexual douchebags liked. So that explains your chiming-in to let us all know. Your silly opinion as a metrosexual douchebag has now been noted.

Now please return your attention to your pedicure, while you search the Bare Minerals site looking for the right concealer.

You must be sad and insecure. I don't even know what bare mi wraps is.

Now as a truck driving country boy from Wyoming, I know I don't like fat women. I like women who can hike, fish, camp, drive a truck and lift a barbell. Fat women usually don't fit that description. Most men want something nice to look at, obese women aren't.

Also, growing up out west, you don't see overweight women. I lived in Wyoming and aCorado and never saw fat women. Curves - yes - but hey we're active, fit and had muscle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I recently had to confront this question. I met a woman on Tinder who really represented herself in the best light weight wise.
When she showed up, I realized she was 30lbs over what the photos indicated. I would say she was 5'5" and 165 lbs

I'm usually attracted to thin, very thin girls. But I had already committed my evening to this woman and I didn't want to be rude so I went with it. The fact that she was significantly younger than me probably helped.

Anyway, after several rounds of very strong drinks, we ended up at her place and WOW. At first I was worried if I would be able to get it up because I was so focused on how overweight she was. But she was so into sex it made the whole thing worth it 3x

Now I think I am into chubby

Or, women that aren't unattractive, young, who are a little overweight and are sexually driven?

+1 Details, details

What kind of details would you like?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I prefer to sleep with a guy who knows Melissa has two s's and only one l and that Rosie O'Donnell has two l's at the end of her last name.

Why would anyone care? They're actors. Who cares if they spell their names with two Ps and a silent Q. It's sad I even know who they are.

If you know who the actors are enough to cite them as examples of something, at least spell their names correctly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm female and for me:

Size 8- never get hit on, DH has zero interest in sex

Size 4-6: occasionally hit on, DH moderate interest in sex

Size 2- hit on constantly, DH can't keep his hands off me.

I think you have to look at people's actions rather than what they say they want. There's a reason celebrities have low body fat, wear a lot of makeup, have certain hairstyles/clothing, and use photoshop- it's what the majority of people are attracted to.

And it goes both ways- a lot of women I know say they like dad bod, but 50 Shades and Magic Mike probably wouldn't have had as much success if the men in them had flabby stomachs and flat butts.

You might just not carry extra weight well. I've been anywhere from a 10 to an 18 and I get hit on constantly at each size, but it's always distributed in an hourglass -- just bigger or smaller. I imagine it's harder for people with no hips or an apple shape (or very short women) to carry weight in a way that looks sexy even if it's bigger.

This does make a difference. Women who carry weight in their stomach have it worse when it comes to looking ok with a few extra pounds.

Also, if your husband has no interest in sex with you at a soize 8, pp, that's truly sad and says a lot - none of it good - about your marriage.

[Anonymous]

Would you rather hump a 22 year old size 10 or 45 year old size 4.

Interesting thought experiment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Would you rather hump a 22 year old size 10 or 45 year old size 4.

Interesting thought experiment

The 22 year old is younger than my daughter so unless I discover a teaching fetish I am not aware of she would be out regardless.

But if forced to make a choice, and so long as both are equally enthusiastic about sex, between a 22 size 10 or 45 size 10 I would take the 45. Women of that age are more interesting and knowledgeable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you rather hump a 22 year old size 10 or 45 year old size 4.

Interesting thought experiment

The 22 year old is younger than my daughter so unless I discover a teaching fetish I am not aware of she would be out regardless.

But if forced to make a choice, and so long as both are equally enthusiastic about sex, between a 22 size 10 or 45 size 10 I would take the 45. Women of that age are more interesting and knowledgeable.

The 45 year old no doubts. Not only is she probably going to look better, but experience usually also means better sex.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Would you rather hump a 22 year old size 10 or 45 year old size 4.

Interesting thought experiment

Here's another one: ladies, would you rather hump a strong, fit man or a lazy, fat bellied man? Love, age and money aren't factors.

[Anonymous]

Be careful what you ask for, men.

I'm 42 and in great shape/low body weight/fit and frankly my husbands 20 lb weight gain since marriage is starting to get to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This picture is ridiculously wrong.
From L-R: Size 0, size 6, size 10-12

+1 about the wrongness. As a buff guy, the woman on the right is by far the hottest. I'm not alone.

+1

I believe part of it is the average height of a woman is 5'4 (depending on the country, but in the US that's the average height and most of western europe is similar). So a size 12 on a 5'4 woman is going to look a lot different and a lot more like the woman on the right.

[Anonymous]

I am a size 12/14 and hooked up with a totally buff ex Marine half my age this weekend Size is not the determining factor for all men.