Thanks for sharing that. What did she say about all the recent ISIS carnage? |
I see what you did there. You were asked a question about whether you disapproved of the radical Islamic violence, so of course you knew you had to say "yes." But then you deliberately negated the impact of that disapproval by saying "I denounce all violence," attempting to make a moral equivalence between radical Islamic terrorism and I guess anything else you want. Meaning that you don't really think radical Islamic violence is any more significant than any other kind of violence. You denounce it the same way as you do "all" violence. And then you imply you haven't been to a mosque since decades ago. So you're claiming ignorance of "modern" or "recent" Islamic jihadist doctrine. IOW you're an apologist for the Islamic terrorists, as almost every other Islamic person seems to be, who chooses to speak about it. You just can't come straight out and denounce the recent radical Islamic violence and the ideology behind it, can you? That's why Trump has traction. Because of people like yourself. |
Well clearly that's what liberal Americans fervently want to believe. The problem is that there isn't really a clear distinction that you wish to believe there is. You'll almost never hear a "peaceful" Muslim person offer a clear cut, unequivocal denunciation of radical Islamic acts of violence. There will ALWAYS be rationalizations, excuses, and justifications for it. |
Actually, the claim of "peaceful" Muslims that they're terrified of possible discrimination, and that should be the focal point of concern of Americans, rather than the actual murderous acts of radical Islamic terrorists, is all part of a rather broad propaganda campaign in which the "peaceful" Islamic folks indirectly support the violent radical Islamic groups. They want people to feel guilty for being scared of the dangers of radical Islamic terrorists, that'll shame them into backing off from tougher security measures. Makes America a softer target. |
LOL wat? Are you actually claiming that simply because the U.S. might reject 10,000 Syrian peaceful refugees who only want to come to the U.S. in peace and start new peaceful lives here, they will be prone to turn into murderous radical Islamic thugs? Check your logic circuit please, it seems to be missing. |
Why are you putting "peaceful" in quotes? Do you approve of discrimination against innocent people? You seem to be justifying prejudice. Do you think that when people like you imply that there are no such thing as peaceful Muslims that you might encourage those who would do violence against them? |
I have to agree. As an ex-Catholic who was sick of the hypocrisy, I can mirror your response. too many excuses, too much "hope" in reforming the church You can't ever erase the fact that children were ALLOWED to be raped. all excuses all bullshit |
agreed. it makes me sick. I have a lot of Muslim friends, but there is a code of silence. you never hear them denouncing the violence outright, just in very guarded terms. . while I don't consider myself anti-islam, I will never defend the religion for this very reason, and I don't think it deserves to be given equal protection here in the us. |
+10000. I don't think open or any of these nkn-violent Muslims will ever understand this though. |
You guys must be having out with the wrong Muslims. I hear clear cut denunciation of radical Islamic acts of violence all the time. |
Over 300 have been murdered in Baltimore this year already but it's ignored as it's mostly black on black crime and contradicts the SJW narrative. Of course it's "worth it" to shut down an existing refugee program. We don't have any obligation to Syrian refugees. It's a costly program and adds risk. Perhaps if these Syrian refugees had to make due in their own country they would be forced to fight back against radical Islam. |
But those were extreme Catholics who were not following the teachings of the Catholic church. |
You mean like what was previously posted in this thread? Do you understand the difference between "equivocal" and "unequivocal"? |
If you want to start a separate thread advocating that children stop bathing, please be my guest. However, it's a complete non sequitur i.e. not logical related to the topic under discussion. Pure SJW logic. |
This thread was started by a Muslim who was worried about a backlash from people like you. Your reaction was to put her on trial. I repeat, if you do not hear unequivocal denunciations of radical Islamic acts of violence, you need to broaden your horizons. If your normal reaction to Muslims is to hold them guilty until they prove their innocence, then no wonder you don't get the reaction for which you hoped. |