Why are MoCo kids failing math exams?

[Anonymous]

Sure, it's sad. But, clairvoyant parents and students in the 21st century find a "work-around solution" to this problem. It is not always the best solution for the greater good but at least it takes care of the immediate problem.

Mr. Starr and his MCPS bureaucratic colleagues are all using the same "work around" solutions for their own children in the MCPS system they supervise!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sure, it's sad. But, clairvoyant parents and students in the 21st century find a "work-around solution" to this problem. It is not always the best solution for the greater good but at least it takes care of the immediate problem.

Mr. Starr and his MCPS bureaucratic colleagues are all using the same "work around" solutions for their own children in the MCPS system they supervise!

Which is why homeschooling is getting more and more popular. Why send them off for 6hrs just to have to teach and constantly enrich at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The kids in MoCo who are failing math exams are all those kids who solely rely on the MCPS math curriculum and their teachers to teach them this subject.

Those in MoCo doing well in mathematics are those kids who solely rely on enrichment outside of the MCPS math curriculum and their teachers to appropriately and optimally learn this subject.

This hypothesis does not even warrant testing. It is the plain and obvious truth.

I'm guessing that you didn't major in science in college?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sure, it's sad. But, clairvoyant parents and students in the 21st century find a "work-around solution" to this problem. It is not always the best solution for the greater good but at least it takes care of the immediate problem.

Mr. Starr and his MCPS bureaucratic colleagues are all using the same "work around" solutions for their own children in the MCPS system they supervise!

How do you know this?

[Anonymous]

Wake up. No one here needs a PhD to understand what a hypothesis, aim, objective, or "work around" is? Are you really that stupid. Open your eyes and ears my friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wake up. No one here needs a PhD to understand what a hypothesis, aim, objective, or "work around" is? Are you really that stupid. Open your eyes and ears my friend.

I know what all of those things are, thanks.

And I'm still waiting for evidence.

[Anonymous]

I know what all of those things are, thanks.

And I'm still waiting for evidence.

Evidence is tapping you on the shoulder. Open your eyes and ears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I know what all of those things are, thanks.

And I'm still waiting for evidence.

Evidence is tapping you on the shoulder. Open your eyes and ears.

Good grief.

[Anonymous]

Good grief. Our spoon fed culture always seeking instant gratification and solutions but too lazy to work at it. Another tutor, trainer, psychotherapist, educational consultant, prep course and how to book for d(c)ummies. Good grief.

[Anonymous]

What are you talking about?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good grief. Our spoon fed culture always seeking instant gratification and solutions but too lazy to work at it. Another tutor, trainer, psychotherapist, educational consultant, prep course and how to book for d(c)ummies. Good grief.

Wait, the people doing more schooling at home after school are lazy? Huh?

[Anonymous]

Let's stick to the topic.

[Anonymous]

It sure would be an interesting study to ask parents/tutors NOT to help outside of assisting homework and see where the test scores would go. I know that would never happen but it sure would be interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It sure would be an interesting study to ask parents/tutors NOT to help outside of assisting homework and see where the test scores would go. I know that would never happen but it sure would be interesting.

The hypothesis you would be testing would be, "What happens to test scores for kids of high-SES parents if their parents don't behave like high-SES parents." I don't think that's the hypothesis you're intending to test, though. (Or maybe it is.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It sure would be an interesting study to ask parents/tutors NOT to help outside of assisting homework and see where the test scores would go. I know that would never happen but it sure would be interesting.

The hypothesis you would be testing would be, "What happens to test scores for kids of high-SES parents if their parents don't behave like high-SES parents." I don't think that's the hypothesis you're intending to test, though. (Or maybe it is.)

Besides helping out on daily homework - no more than that. Yes, what would text scores be?