I guess you only get to "choose" when you agree with this administration

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Many insurers don't cover infertility. So this whole "cover viagra because it enables conception" argument rings false to me.

What I see is a religious willingness to encourage and support male sexuality but a reluctantance to embrace women's sexual freedom.

I see no reason why we should pay for either. One of the PPs claims a range of health benefits for sex. Well, can I get my health care plan to pay for my blueberries or oatmeal that I understand are great for my health. What about my gym membership? Private trainer? Why not? The health benefits are pretty much the same. I am confident that, in evolutionary terms, there is a difference between sex to continue mankind and sex because I want it. What we have here is that everything, even lifestyle choices, become health related. An older guy that can't get it up must have a health problem. Health care costs will never get under control with some of the arguments stated above. I am far more interested in spending limited resources on a breast cancer victim to ensure her survival than to pay her birth control pills so she can have fun on Saturday night. Sorry, paying for someone's sex life is not my problem.

Great. Make contraception an over-the-counter drug. Let the people decide and pay for it the way they want. Volume will go up, prices will go down, problem solved.

If you conservative types want a doctor in between the people and their medicine, then it should be allowed on any plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sexual health is health. It's part of someone's overall well-being, both physically and mentally.

Sorry, whether you are able to have sex as often as you want (without getting pregnant) is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found freedom or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

Yes it is. People who have sex regularly are in better health, live longer, get fewer cancers, have healthier hearts, sleep better, and are not depressed as often. We are meant to have sex.

And people who work out also are in better health (we are obviously meant to be in good shape, too!) but my health insurance won't pay for my gym membership.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sexual health is health. It's part of someone's overall well-being, both physically and mentally.

Sorry, whether you are able to have sex as often as you want (without getting pregnant) is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found freedom or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

Yes it is. People who have sex regularly are in better health, live longer, get fewer cancers, have healthier hearts, sleep better, and are not depressed as often. We are meant to have sex.

And people who work out also are in better health (we are obviously meant to be in good shape, too!) but my health insurance won't pay for my gym membership.

My health insurance does pay for my gym membership

[TheManWithAUsername]

Anonymous wrote:Yes it is. People who have sex regularly are in better health, live longer, get fewer cancers, have healthier hearts, sleep better, and are not depressed as often. We are meant to have sex.

I've often speculated that this kind of thing would be true, but I've never heard that from an authority. Can you point me to sources? If nothing else, I'll pass it on to my wife.

[TheManWithAUsername]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, whether you are able to have sex as often as you want (without getting pregnant) is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found freedom or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

Sorry, whether you are able to play tennis as often as you want is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found tennis whites or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

If I don't enjoy an activity, it's not an important activity.!!!!!!

It's BS!!!!

I said so!!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sexual health is health. It's part of someone's overall well-being, both physically and mentally.

Sorry, whether you are able to have sex as often as you want (without getting pregnant) is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found freedom or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

Yes it is. People who have sex regularly are in better health, live longer, get fewer cancers, have healthier hearts, sleep better, and are not depressed as often. We are meant to have sex.

And people who work out also are in better health (we are obviously meant to be in good shape, too!) but my health insurance won't pay for my gym membership.

You don't ever need a gym to exercise. Unless you have some sort of disability, and then insurance would likely cover it under habilitative or rehabilitative services.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sexual health is health. It's part of someone's overall well-being, both physically and mentally.

Sorry, whether you are able to have sex as often as you want (without getting pregnant) is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found freedom or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

Yes it is. People who have sex regularly are in better health, live longer, get fewer cancers, have healthier hearts, sleep better, and are not depressed as often. We are meant to have sex.

And people who work out also are in better health (we are obviously meant to be in good shape, too!) but my health insurance won't pay for my gym membership.

You don't ever need a gym to exercise. Unless you have some sort of disability, and then insurance would likely cover it under habilitative or rehabilitative services.

You don't need Viagra to have sex either. Just intercourse!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sexual health is health. It's part of someone's overall well-being, both physically and mentally.

Sorry, whether you are able to have sex as often as you want (without getting pregnant) is NOT health. Sorry. It may be fun, meaningful (or not), relaxing (afterwards), good exercise, etc. But it is not health. The idea that I should be pay for some 20s year old who wants to enjoy herself in her new found freedom or some old man who can't get over the fact that he is getting older is simply BS!!!

Yes it is. People who have sex regularly are in better health, live longer, get fewer cancers, have healthier hearts, sleep better, and are not depressed as often. We are meant to have sex.

And people who work out also are in better health (we are obviously meant to be in good shape, too!) but my health insurance won't pay for my gym membership.

You don't ever need a gym to exercise. Unless you have some sort of disability, and then insurance would likely cover it under habilitative or rehabilitative services.

You don't need Viagra to have sex either. Just intercourse!

I think Clinton would love this debate about what constitutes sex.

[TheManWithAUsername]

Say what you want, but the guy didn't need Viagra.

...unlike SOME 1996 presidential candidates we could mention.

[Anonymous]

Just read a post on FB from a conservative Republican saying that they are urging Boehner to IMPEACH Obama over this.

Wow, A liberal black man for president really, really does make people CRAZY.