Nope, plenty of people in this thread have a problem with that. Here's the thing, though: It's not her fault she's famous. She made the sex tape, she makes money from it, yes. But she wouldn't have a reality show, all of her endorsement deals, and her millions of dollars if people weren't interested in her. If no one were interested in her, she wouldn't be relevant, and the money train would stop. Even you and I are playing into this by discussing her in this thread. She is an effect, not the cause. |
Your husband and sons are probably jerking off to her right now.as is a large part of the worlds male population. |
A sorry retort. Attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder, and though it does seem over the top for the OP to have called Kim's appearance disgusting when she's fully clothed in the pics OP linked to, that's the OP's opinion. Many men rub one out to Kim because they find her attractive, true. A woman's opinion about something isn't invalid just because it might turn her husband on. |
What are u sorry about hon? It was op who asked if kim was sexy and I simply pointed out that for a large part of the male population yes, they would dream to bang her.meanwhile op's opinion is not of consequence. |
What are u sorry about hon? It was op who asked if kim was sexy and I simply pointed out that for a large part of the male population yes, they would dream to bang her.meanwhile op's opinion is not of consequence. |
22:50 I hardly think that Kim is a victim. She is a fame-whore.
|
and female! |
Sorry is used as an adjective modifying the noun "retort" in the phrase "a sorry retort," not as an apology. This is the case any time "sorry" precedes a noun. See the fourth entry on this page: http://oald8.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/dictionary/sorry_1 |
Still wondering where the Kardashians came from. One day I turned on the TV and there was a ton of coverage about them and their show but no explaination why we should watch it. Or why we should know who they were to begin with. |