Lafayette/Bucknell vs Nescacs

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Try as they have for many months, Midd boosters can’t face the facts. Your school Middlebury is no longer in the same grouping of Amherst, Willams, or now Bowdoin. Its endowment is half of the other three schools. Applications have dropped at Midd and they had a financial deficit. Don’t need to hear the same rebuttal that a grad from the 70’s is the COO of some bank who cares. Times have changed agree with several others Colby, Hamilton, Midd, and Bates are interchangeable. Have not any interest in these small, remote schools with horrible weather and no location diversity as in host towns. These are not Ute 60s and 70s when those schools plateaued. They appeal to a small full pay private school clientele whose kids can’t get into the Ivies, Duke, and Stanford.

You are nonsensically stupid. Facts are friendly and I am sure that the fine folks at Middlebury are quite happy your kid didn’t get in.

These are all great schools. If your kid prefers any one of them, attends and thrives… they will do well in life.

If you don’t prefer one of these schools, don’t attend, don’t let your kid attend, but for the love of God stop putting everything down that is not your preference!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:any athlete who has the academic chops to get into the upper Nescac schools would prefer to be at an ivy league- they just weren’t good enough at their sport to get recruited. Nescac is the land of failed ivy wannabees. I think most would choose the dregs of the ivy - Cornell - over Amherst and Williams

Thanks for your anecdotal nonsense!