You are mentally ill. Seek help. |
This. The point about the many DCPS schools with frightening low CAPE scores is that *those tax-payee funded public schools are not meeting the needs of all kids* either. They definitely aren't meeting the needs of advanced students, and are they actually meeting the needs of average and high needs kids? What kind of future are they preparing them for? |
There is a very real stain of thinking that finds programming for advanced students as inherently inequitable and improper in an urban educational landscape. There really is no compromise on such a fundamental ideological fissure. |
Yes - until every urban child has a shot, you UMC types get nothing; you have enough. |
The bolded is factually incorrect. The Arizona Basis schools will backfill with talented kids even into high school, as long as the kids pass a placement test. I know of kids who have entered Basis as late as 9th grade. The only reason Basis DC does not replace the attrition is that the DC laws do not allow for any placement testing. Your entire premise here is wrong. |
DP- Then what about BASIS resorting to selective admission through GPA, interview and on-site essay similar to Walls or Banneker, and backfill rising 9th graders. That would provide additional opportunities for rising high schoolers, and ease off the competition with other selective high schools. |
DC law forbids that: " A public charter school may not limit enrollment on the basis of a student’s race, color, religion, national origin, language spoken, intellectual or athletic ability, measures of achievement or aptitude, or status as a student with special needs." https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/38-1802.06 |
Yes -- to clarify even more specifically, DC charter schools operate under different rules than traditional public schools. DCPS can establish entrance criteria for certain schools -- tests, GPA, recommendations, etc. DC charter schools cannot. |
This decrease in numbers is true. BUT. Think about it. It is over 8 years. Families have 7 years to opt out and go elsewhere for whatever reason. Check out your child's current school and grade level and ask yourself how many of these students in the current 4th grade class were here in Kindergarten? 15 out of 30? 12 out of 24? 10 out of 20? If it is 50% like BASIS, than there is no difference. |
I think the enrichment, clubs, sports etc aspect of a school are overrated. So what if BASIS doesn't have a kiln. It has sports and clubs. Mind you, there are only 450 students in grades 5 - 8 compared to 1,500 at Deal MS. It's a bit like parents saying DC is fabulous for what it has to offer but then never visit a museum, gallery or performance in more than a month. |
100% true. I'm on your side. |
And you've had kids at BASIS for how long? From where I sit, the problem with BASIS' weak ECs is that the set-up favors the UMC kids, and that's putting it mildly. You wind up paying through the nose for the ECs your kid probably needs to crack a highly competitive colleges. It can be a lonely, hectic journey because your student can't do serious high school ECs with classmates, at least not for sports, music, drama etc. You wind up rushing around the DMV as a family to fill in the gaps. Also, the way BASIS structures its curriculum doesn't leave much time for serious high school ECs, not when they're essentially cramming 3 years of HS into 4. We wound up leaving after 9th grade for our eldest, strong in STEM, because hated the arrangement. Sure, maybe ECs are overrated in the big picture, but that doesn't change the fact that colleges want to see them and kids really enjoy them. |
NP but don’t most kids who do serious ECs do them outside of thr school anyway? Serious music kids do orchestra elsewhere, kids who want to play a sport in college often play on club or travel teams, etc. |
a lot of the people who support advanced programming for middle and high school children are actually some of the same people who most dislike basis. basis run by a for-profit arizona charter is a relatively poor substitute for well-rounded programming for more advanced students. it also at a systemic level siphons kids off leaving a relatively weaker cohort behind at some of the neighborhood public schools reducing the pressure/need to offer more advanced programming at those schools. |
Totally this. |