| Great advice as always being posted. We have DEI Kool aid drinkers and people engaging in market timing giving advice. If you can't take a 50% hit to your portfolio, you really need to up your allocation to bonds. It's all a mental game though. I check my investment once a year when I rebalance. If you are mentally weak or you can't change behavior that contributes to you anxiety, simply make changes to your investments and move on to more important things in your life. |
Oh, FU. 401ks are the least American workers deserve. We’d be better off with at least partial pensions too. And anyone can start an IRA. |
What exactly are cash equivalents? Money markets and high interest checking or savings accounts? |
Are you kidding? It could drop another 50% and not make it back for 10 years or more. Look at the Nasdaq in 2000 - around 8000. It took until 2018 or so to make it back to that level. The crash of 1929 - it took until around 1954 to make it back to that level for the Dow. |
NP. On the other hand, if you kept adding 1% to your stock investments every month through these downturns you would make your money back in 10 years or less |
+1 I didn't know until recently that if you include reinvesting dividends it would take approximately 7 years to recover after the 1929 crash. |
|
I have a 403b (one of two) that looks like this:
MID CAP INDEX FUND 59.27% STOCK INDEX FUND 22.37% INTERNATL EQUITIES INDEX FUND 18.36% I retired in the summer 2023 and currently work part time-time. I still have about 6.5 years before I hit age 59.5 but I still won’t necessarily need the funds at that point. I don’t know if I should make changes at this point or stay the course. In the past during downturns my financial advisor has said to stay the course, but I might need to give her a call. After all these years I still feel like a deer in headlights. |
The losses as of Friday haven’t eaten into last year’s gains. So you’re not in terrible shape yet. Given your age, you probably don’t have the most aggressive allocation, so your losses shouldn’t have been what the s&p 500 experienced. |