Treating ADHD without meds

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


Yes, it is a normal feature of well child exams because it is so damaging to leave unaddressed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


PP can you provide a citation to the "overly diagnosed". Overly diagnosed means something very specific - it is being diagnosed frequently in situations where the diagnosed person doesn't actually have ADHD.

It is true that the ADHD diagnosis has increased over time - but I am unaware that there is evidence that that increase is because people who don't have ADHD are being mistakenly diagnosed with it.

Increases in diagnosis can happen for a lot of legitimate reasons - drs and patients become more aware of the existence of a diagnosis and seek help, a treatment becomes available that makes seeking a diagnosis worthwhile, a diagnosis becomes less stigmatized, the broader environment changes causing an increase in the number of people with the illness, etc.

This paper thoroughly reviews ADHD diagnosis increases and concludes,

"ADHD is not a new phenomenon, however its prevalence has increased significantly in the recent years. Given changing diagnostic criteria and increasing awareness of the disorder in marginalized populations, especially individuals of color and females, this finding is not surprising. The general public has become increasingly more aware of ADHD through the media and social media. People are more likely to bring up their concerns to a physician, which in turn might prompt more numbers of people to be diagnosed. While some may argue that the increase is concerning and due to intentional feigning of symptoms in order to gain access to stimulant medication or test accommodations, the evidence suggests these groups have a negligible impact on diagnostic trends. In fact, as medical providers, focus on the idea of “overdiagnosis” may instead be harmful, create additional barriers to care, and add to the stigma towards their requests for help. It is important, instead, to approach patients holistically, and with an understanding of both the risks of treatment and undertreatment in mind. For those who have been struggling with unrecognized ADHD, there are significant impacts to mental health, social life, and work life. Thoughtful diagnosis and subsequent treatment can make all the difference."

Adhd Diagnostic Trends- Increased recognition or over diagnosis?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616454/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


PP can you provide a citation to the "overly diagnosed". Overly diagnosed means something very specific - it is being diagnosed frequently in situations where the diagnosed person doesn't actually have ADHD.



Not PP, but adhd diagnoses are a third greater for young for grade students than old for grade ones. Doesn't that raise your eyebrows just a little?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


PP can you provide a citation to the "overly diagnosed". Overly diagnosed means something very specific - it is being diagnosed frequently in situations where the diagnosed person doesn't actually have ADHD.



Not PP, but adhd diagnoses are a third greater for young for grade students than old for grade ones. Doesn't that raise your eyebrows just a little?


citation please - what is the source of your stat ?

Several obvious reasons why jump to mind but it's hard to address your stat without source.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


PP can you provide a citation to the "overly diagnosed". Overly diagnosed means something very specific - it is being diagnosed frequently in situations where the diagnosed person doesn't actually have ADHD.



Not PP, but adhd diagnoses are a third greater for young for grade students than old for grade ones. Doesn't that raise your eyebrows just a little?


citation please - what is the source of your stat ?

Several obvious reasons why jump to mind but it's hard to address your stat without source.


There was a huge study in Canada. Canada school enrollment goes strictly by calendar year. So everyone born between jan 1 and Dec 32 is in one grade like everyone born in 2010 is in 8th grade, 2013 is in 5th grade, etc.

Then the study looked at adhd prescriptions which is easy because Canada’s health care is nationalized.

They found that the youngest kids -those born in the fall were far more likely to get diagnosed with adhd and prescribed medication
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


PP can you provide a citation to the "overly diagnosed". Overly diagnosed means something very specific - it is being diagnosed frequently in situations where the diagnosed person doesn't actually have ADHD.



Not PP, but adhd diagnoses are a third greater for young for grade students than old for grade ones. Doesn't that raise your eyebrows just a little?


citation please - what is the source of your stat ?

Several obvious reasons why jump to mind but it's hard to address your stat without source.


There was a huge study in Canada. Canada school enrollment goes strictly by calendar year. So everyone born between jan 1 and Dec 32 is in one grade like everyone born in 2010 is in 8th grade, 2013 is in 5th grade, etc.

Then the study looked at adhd prescriptions which is easy because Canada’s health care is nationalized.

They found that the youngest kids -those born in the fall were far more likely to get diagnosed with adhd and prescribed medication

This is not a citation. A citation tells where the “huge study” can be found.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My child has been diagnosed with an astigmatism but I’ve heard that glasses cause headaches and can lead to further degradation of vision. I’d like to try therapy and vitamins and see if that can help before putting him in glasses. Can anyone recommend a good protocol?


PP. You are gold!

All this BS about waiting and seeing or trying all alternatives is a result of stigma against ADHD and psychiatric meds. No parent is reluctant to medicate what they see as "real problems" but, sadly, many parents view developmental disorders and mental illnesses as not real or a product of poor parenting or due to moral or character weakness.


Again. Overly simplistic. ADHD is also easily and overly diagnosed these days. My kids ped started asking about focus and if we had concerns when they were each not even 5. She was looking for it.


PP can you provide a citation to the "overly diagnosed". Overly diagnosed means something very specific - it is being diagnosed frequently in situations where the diagnosed person doesn't actually have ADHD.



Not PP, but adhd diagnoses are a third greater for young for grade students than old for grade ones. Doesn't that raise your eyebrows just a little?


citation please - what is the source of your stat ?

Several obvious reasons why jump to mind but it's hard to address your stat without source.


There was a huge study in Canada. Canada school enrollment goes strictly by calendar year. So everyone born between jan 1 and Dec 32 is in one grade like everyone born in 2010 is in 8th grade, 2013 is in 5th grade, etc.

Then the study looked at adhd prescriptions which is easy because Canada’s health care is nationalized.

They found that the youngest kids -those born in the fall were far more likely to get diagnosed with adhd and prescribed medication

This is not a citation. A citation tells where the “huge study” can be found.


DP. These studies of young for grade children being more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD are well known.

Here are several:

https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(16)00160-8/fulltext

https://www.cmaj.ca/content/184/7/755

Generally: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2018/oct/youngest-class-more-likely-be-diagnosed-adhd
Anonymous
Op I understand where you’re coming from and I think nearly every parent on this journey thinks the same thing upon learning that their child has adhd. Nobody wants their child to be on medication if it can be avoided. You have to let go of the stigma that medicating is a lazy way of dealing with adhd.

Medication have enabled my son to function, to absorb more at school and foster friendships on a level that was previously inaccessible to him. It has improved relationships at home as well.

To me, it’s not how can I treat adhd instead of medications - it’s how can I treat adhd in addition to medication. He is also in OT for sensory integration and self regulation, we have a private SEIT come to his classroom for one hour a day to work on regulation skills, executive functioning and frustration tolerance in a live environment (he’s in prek) and he goes to play based speech therapy to help with articulation on a few sounds. He also attends a social emotional play based social skills group. His medication helps him access his therapies and I cannot underscore the growth we’ve seen in the 6 months that he’s been on a stimulant, 8 months total on medication (started with Guanfacine then added a stimulant)

My hope for him is that he grows up understanding his adhd, knowing that medication is an option for him, and learning how to be self aware of how medication can help him and when he needs it. That, in combination with his therapies and maturity over time, I hope will give him the tools to effectively manage his adhd.

I also have adhd and as an adult struggling, I cannot imagine withholding medication from a child who is struggling with emotional regulation and connecting with peers. You have to assess the damage that the symptoms are causing on a daily basis to determine whether medication benefits would be worth the risks.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

PP here. It's a medical issue of course it's black and white in that it's addressed as a scientific manner of black and white you idiot!

If your kid functions fine then they obviously don't struggle with ADHD! You either have it or not. To a certain extent, you may have different needs in terms of mitigating symptoms but to suggest the kid can function well without any medical intervention is a sign they really are fine.

And 12 is totally manageable. When you hit 8th/9th grade, give me call Both our kids have ADD and we also thought they were fine handling it organically without meds. At 14, things went to hell.

Working memory is a scientifically real thing. Some people truly struggle with focus, complexity, fluid thinking. You can't just exercise it out. It's a medical problem you fool.


Obviously this is very personal to you and triggers a strong reaction. None the less, the poster is not an idiot or a fool. Some people with depression treat with meds and think there is no other answer (and for some there isn't). Others treat with cognitive behavior therapy, heavy exercise, a combo. ADHD may be a medical issue but like with mental health in general treatment options are more complex. Acknowledging that doesn't make someone else stupid nor does it undermine that you made a solid choice for your own children.

The question I have, is what happens when your teens go out at night, after their meds wear off, and have to make social decisions? No one has answered that part. Do you medicate 24/7?


DP - I'm not sure of your point - are you saying that because ADHD brains are exhibiting disorder 24/7 and medicine is not 24/7, that there is no point to medicine?

Stimulants cannot be taken 24/7 because of their effect on sleep - but many people take an extended release version so that the medicine coverage extends as far as possible throughout the day. There are other non-stimulant medicines like Strattera which extend 24 hours.

Or is your point that kids have to learn behaviors to cope with the unmedicated portion of their day? OK, but the thing is that medicine has been shown to be effective in clinical trials for about 80% of people. The psychosocial interventions really don't have robust data showing they are effective, except for behavioral modification therapy. NIMH's MultiModal Treatment Study from 2009 says,

"the MTA study demonstrated that, on average, carefully monitored medication with monthly follow-up is more effective than intensive behavioral treatment alone, for up to 14 months.". https://www.nimh.nih.gov/funding/clinical-research/practical/mta/the-multimodal-treatment-of-attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-study-mtaquestions-and-answers

(Although the study did show meds + behavior therapy is similarly effective)


Truly I didn't have a point..I have a question. My child is already very thin (thanks hyperactivity) and small..so a key concern is appetite. I've been told you handle that with schedule adjustments so then I wonder how my kid will feel and behave weekends and nights. Will school go better but not sports? Etc.


As a parent of a thin child with ADHD - there are non-stimulant meds that don't affect appetite. Stimulant meds can be given after breakfast. You can have 2 short acting doses so that kid is hungry at lunch or afterschool, our kid did second dinner for a time. There's also high calorie drinks. And one can take weekend, holiday and summer breaks depending on what else is going on.

A good psychiatrist can help you work through many options. Also, look at the MTA study data - I don't think the overall height/weight effect was that great and certainly something that didn't, IMO, outweigh the real benefits in a wide academic and social domain.


Thank you for replying. Did you find your child struggled during those off times. Weekends are very sports filled and social for us so I just wonder about the contrast of interacting with friends during school, when medicated and then on the weekends when not? Also, my kids hyperactivity is so baked into him, that part of me worries I'll miss him and the fun super creative part. All this would be much clearer if the need was super clear but for us its very border line. (Which is why some of these replies are so off putting to me...not this one of course!)


Hi pp. I want to at least speak to the fun creative part and say that when my child is on stimulants that isn’t lost at all. My son is still very much himself. Still engaged, creative, intense. It’s more that the edge is slightly off so still hyper but not jumping up and down constantly. Still fun but not as frustrated the second something goes wrong. Hope that helps.

And as for weekends, we do a short acting one time in the morning and so far that has worked for him so we use it 7 days a week. Since it is just the short acting he usually has a big afternoon snack and dinner. At first he ate a lot less lunch and some days he still does but that has evened out more and anything he doesn’t eat he makes up at dinner etc. So we just use it consistently. If your child is on the border though there may not be such a difference that you worry with friends.

Also anecdotal and just my opinion not based on research but I think it helps my child at night even though the stimulant has worn off. my theory is because he doesn’t have to work as hard to hold it together during the day, he often has a little more bandwidth at night.
Anonymous
To the PP who noted their kid was on guanfacine, did you notice any improvements before adding the stimulant? We've tried stimulant medications in the past and they are not well-tolerated by my son. We were going to start guanfacine but didn't end up pursuing it for any number of reasons. Based on what I'm reading in this thread, I'm wondering if it's time to get back and at least give a non-stimulant a try.

Other posters, have any of you had the experience that your child was more able to tolerate the stimulant side-effects as they got older? When we tried the first two stimulants, we had pretty noticeable negative impacts including the complete inability to sleep and nonstop twitching/tics. It wore off with the meds but definitely not something that we could tolerate on a daily basis.
post reply Forum Index » Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Message Quick Reply
Go to: