Personally, I think Beyonce should have won. |
Cillian Celtic That's Irish |
Yup - two black people took home Oscars and a group of Asians did. And all the rest where white, white, white.
|
Jonathan Glazer spoke to ALL the victims of the current conflict: |
So what? You’re petty. |
I'm still bewildered how Glenn lost. |
It was not appropriate to appropriate a holocaust movie to talk against holocaust appropriation by “the occupation”, especially when the pro Palestinian side absolutely is appropriating the holocaust constantly. |
|
Can we stop giving the final envelope to old people? It's not working out too well. Also, anyone catch what the message in oversized font was taped to Pacino's envelope? I'm assuming it was instructions that he breezed right past.
I watched Poor Things this past weekend and knew to expect to to be weird going in, but I have to agree with OP-I don't get the hype about her performance. During the first half it was as though she was mimicking a disabled person, so hard to watch, and the second half is her just getting it on with a bunch of people and while I get she's liberating herself from her baby brain, etc. and going through this transformative experience, it seemed like forced acting to me. Could not stand Ruffalo but maybe that was the point. I just think the academy likes her and this was more a popularity contest. |
| I’m just Ken was the only part worth watching, so clever and well done with the Marilyn Monroe Gentlemen prefer blondes hommage. The rest was boring. |
I also really disliked Stone's performance. It ruined the movie for me. I thought the other performances, the visuals, the writing were all intriguing. Her performance had weird theater kid energy to me and didn't work for me at all. A huge point of her character is the vulnerability of having a child's brain development in an adult body, but her performance felt hard and pointed to me. I'm honestly shocked she won. I love Lily Gladstone and hope she gets more and better roles after this but she was given too little to work with in FoTKM. She did a lot with it but a lot of her performance is just vibes because the movie really focused much more on DiCaprio. He role is not fully fleshed out and her interiority and motivations are often unclear as a result. Not Gladstone's fault -- I think it was a mistake for Scorcese to try and tackle that subject matter and wish someone else had made that movie. I would have given it to either Sandra Hüller (great performance in *perfect* movie) or Mulligan (great performance that elevated otherwise very mediocre movie). Though I haven't seen Nyad yet, but an Oscar is somewhat superfluous for Benning at this stage. |
|
The straps on Emily Blunt's dress drove us nuts all night.
The way they were two inches above her shoulders. I did not like that effect. It was so distracting, even more so when sitting. I know it was constructed like some armor suit--but no Bueno. |
Agreed. It’s not that hard to read nominne’s names and actually making it clear you’re announcing the winner. They worry too much about getting a revered older actor for the Best Picture category but it’s awkward an embarrassing. |
You are not the arbiter or gatekeeper of who gets to invoke the Holocaust. If a Jewish man who produced an Oscar winning movie about the perpetrators of the Holocaust isn’t allowed to make a statement about Holocaust appropriation, I’m not sure who fits your criteria. Probably only those who involve the Holocaust to defend Israel’s attacks on Gazan civilians. |
I'm going to let the JEW Jonathan Glazer make his own decisions about what's appropriate in terms of talking about human rights, the holocaust, and the current genocide in Gaza. |
The movie stands on its own, for its own important historical value, especially since Glazer was granted exceptional access and support to tell his story. Given this, any appropriation, from any side, is inappropriate. I am not surprised you make assumptions though. |