I hadn't give this much thought before - but I think I would include 529 in net worth until it leaves your control and goes to the college. |
But it’s not spent. It’s in an investment account. The kids may not go to college, or choose a state school or a military academy, etc. We have savings for future cars and home improvements too but until we buy those things, that money is part of our net worth. |
97th percentile. We are the same. |
|
If you have a college degree, live with are partner, and are retirement age 65+
1M - 40% 2M - 55% 3M - 70% 4M - 75% 6M - 80% 10M - 90% 20M - 95% People that got/stayed married and have college degrees are doing pretty well. Change one of those and the numbers plummet, change both and you see where the retirement crisis comes from. |
These numbers don't correspond with the WaPo article calculator. |
They are directly from the calculator, scroll down and enter the variables. |
So you paid for your own college? |
Emphasis on "claim". Everyone on the internet is a billionaire supermodel |
Are they counting net worth as double (household) for partnered people? |
Stocks could crash. Banks could fail. Government could collapse. You should model the risk adjusted value of your assets. |
You absolutely should! Yoy cat pay your rent with your tax payments. |
But I guarantee that almost everybody complaining that a 529 shouldn't be included in net worth isn't reducing their portfolio by projected tax liability. |
Yes, obviously. Which is correct. The only people who think net worth should be quantified at the individual, even if they are married, are single and/or divorced people. For the rest of us, a married couple is a single financial unit for purposes of calculating net worth. |
+1 |
PP you are responding to.. All that is true. I do adjust my model to reflect a drawdown that the market never recovers from. E.g. If my net worth on Jan 1 is $5M and I expect a 5% growth, that would be % 5,250,000 at the end of the year. I reduce this by a "reduction factor" (e.g. 10%) so the beginning value in my model for next year would be $4,200,000. The model also assumes we never recover from this. i.e. a reset. After the 2022 dip, I used a 20% Reduction Factor because the market was already down 20+%. I just upped it to 50% given the 2023 run-up and I'm still good. So, yeah, I do factor in a lot of risk. I also think my 5% growth rate is very conservative and by itself offsets some of the risk associated with dying broke, which, at the end of the day is the real risk we all need to mitigate. |