anyone get unexpected / surprise results in DNA test?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I think is interesting is that my sister and share the same parents but have pretty different ethnic compositions. My mom is 100% italian, my dad is a combo of german, irish polish.

My sister is 60% italian, with less of the others.
I'm 20% italian, with more of the others.
Also, my son has more italian, 35%, than me.

Pretty cool.


To add, my husband has no italian lineage.


OP here. So this interests me because my sibling had her DNA tested and I just assumed mine would be identical. Is the difference because your siblings used different DNA testing companies at different times, do you think? Or do you think it can be that variable between relatives?


My family all used the same DNA company kits at the same time. I assumed my sister and I would be almost identical. And thought I'd be 1/2 italian from my mom and 16 % each polish/german/irish from my dad but apparently, it doesn't work that way. I guess DNA can be inherited in endless variations. Maybe someone with a genetics background could explain this better.


You inherit different parts of your history, and not equal parts. Siblings don't look exactly alike for this reason.
Anonymous
My mom and dad both tested (I haven't yet - but assume I can just rely on their data).

Mom was 100% UK.

Dad was 99% Uk and 1% Ashkenazi jew from the north of Spain.

That was kind of funny - like, the most white, waspy, could-have-been-on-the-mayflower make up. Except 150 years ago, someone in Southampton probably had a wild weekend with a Jewish visitor from Spain.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My mom and dad both tested (I haven't yet - but assume I can just rely on their data).

Mom was 100% UK.

Dad was 99% Uk and 1% Ashkenazi jew from the north of Spain.

That was kind of funny - like, the most white, waspy, could-have-been-on-the-mayflower make up. Except 150 years ago, someone in Southampton probably had a wild weekend with a Jewish visitor from Spain.


There is literally no such category
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My mom and dad both tested (I haven't yet - but assume I can just rely on their data).

Mom was 100% UK.

Dad was 99% Uk and 1% Ashkenazi jew from the north of Spain.

That was kind of funny - like, the most white, waspy, could-have-been-on-the-mayflower make up. Except 150 years ago, someone in Southampton probably had a wild weekend with a Jewish visitor from Spain.


There is literally no such category


She meant British Isles. Yes, that is a category
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My mom and dad both tested (I haven't yet - but assume I can just rely on their data).

Mom was 100% UK.

Dad was 99% Uk and 1% Ashkenazi jew from the north of Spain.

That was kind of funny - like, the most white, waspy, could-have-been-on-the-mayflower make up. Except 150 years ago, someone in Southampton probably had a wild weekend with a Jewish visitor from Spain.


There is literally no such category


She meant British Isles. Yes, that is a category


No sorry there is not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My mom and dad both tested (I haven't yet - but assume I can just rely on their data).

Mom was 100% UK.

Dad was 99% Uk and 1% Ashkenazi jew from the north of Spain.

That was kind of funny - like, the most white, waspy, could-have-been-on-the-mayflower make up. Except 150 years ago, someone in Southampton probably had a wild weekend with a Jewish visitor from Spain.


There is literally no such category


She meant British Isles. Yes, that is a category


No sorry there is not.


So... there's everything except Brits?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:According to 23 and Me, 99 percent of my ancestors are from various parts of the British Isles, and 1 percent are from Northeastern India. My ancestors have all been in Virginia for more than 300 years so I assume the ancestor from India must have come over as a servant to an English immigrant. I haven’t been able to identify specifically who it was. Possibly the used an anglicanized name.


It’s may be a Roma rather than an Indian.



Roma are from Central Europe and Middle East, not India.


Incorrect. They originated from northern India, long ago. I grew up in southern Scotland and my father’s family is Romany. Some still travel by horse drawn caravan and will stake out their horses to graze near my sister’s home.
Anonymous
My dad found out his sister is only a half sister.

My cousins are mostly European and a little Indigenous, but also had Egyptian, Arab, and Mongolian.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of incorrect information on here from people who don't understand the difference between autosomal dna and sex-linked dna. You get half of your dna from each of your parents regardless of your biological sex. Females don't have a Y chromosome, but that only means you can't get the limited information contained on that one chromosome regarding that haploid group. The poster at 15: 16 summarized it correctly.


Ethnicity is not inherited in equal parts, so you don’t get 50% of DNA from each parent.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What I think is interesting is that my sister and share the same parents but have pretty different ethnic compositions. My mom is 100% italian, my dad is a combo of german, irish polish.

My sister is 60% italian, with less of the others.
I'm 20% italian, with more of the others.
Also, my son has more italian, 35%, than me.

Pretty cool.


This doesn’t add up. Biological siblings should be fairly similar. There is variation but not like what you are describing.

If your mother is 100% Italian, you both should be about 50% Italian. If your sister is 60% that means she inherited 10% Italian from your father’s side as well. The fact that you’re only 20% doesn’t make sense. As for your son having 35% Italian (more than you!), that indicates his father had some Italian DNA as well.
Anonymous
You do get 50% from each parent.
Anonymous
I found a first cousin on 23 and me. So that was fun for my uncle’s wife lol
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There is a lot of incorrect information on here from people who don't understand the difference between autosomal dna and sex-linked dna. You get half of your dna from each of your parents regardless of your biological sex. Females don't have a Y chromosome, but that only means you can't get the limited information contained on that one chromosome regarding that haploid group. The poster at 15: 16 summarized it correctly.


Ethnicity is not inherited in equal parts, so you don’t get 50% of DNA from each parent.


Half of your DNA is from your mother and half is from your father. Each side is recombined so you get a random mixture from each parent. If your mom is 100% Irish and your dad is 50% Italian and 50% ashkenazi Jewish, then half of your DNA will be Irish, and half will be a recombination of Italian and Jewish. On that side, it may be an equal 25% Jewish and 25% Italian. Or, it maybe 40% Italian and 10% Jewish. THAT is how siblings get different results. But each sibling would be approximately 50% Irish.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What I think is interesting is that my sister and share the same parents but have pretty different ethnic compositions. My mom is 100% italian, my dad is a combo of german, irish polish.

My sister is 60% italian, with less of the others.
I'm 20% italian, with more of the others.
Also, my son has more italian, 35%, than me.

Pretty cool.


This doesn’t add up. Biological siblings should be fairly similar. There is variation but not like what you are describing.

If your mother is 100% Italian, you both should be about 50% Italian. If your sister is 60% that means she inherited 10% Italian from your father’s side as well. The fact that you’re only 20% doesn’t make sense. As for your son having 35% Italian (more than you!), that indicates his father had some Italian DNA as well.


I think it's because humans have been mating with each other across culture for 100,000 years, so it's actually hard to pin down what an "Italian" is.

For example -- I took the test. I'm Indian (Bengali) and both my parents are from the same region of Bengal, as are their ancestors for as long as anyone can remember -- like, hundreds of years and many generations. I look like a completely typical Bengali woman.

But when I took the test, my results were 50% South Asian, 25% Central Asian, 25 % Southeast Asian. The only way this makes sense is because people in this region have been migrating and mating over the last, like 10,000 years. I read into their methodology and they said they take a "typical" person from that region and compare you DNA to that person. I *am* a typical Bengali person, but that's the breakdown I got.

Anonymous
No real surprises in my family but DH found out about a lot of secrets in his family - the unknown cousin who is a child of his uncle that has never been discussed, as well as his parent's sibling only being a half sibling due to an affair and the newly discovered parent of that half sibling being someone well known to the family who lived close by.
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: