Would a cheap person ever use shortening in place of butter for chocolate chip cookies?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Natural lard is not the same as seed oil Crisco. The former is terrific, the latter is poison.

You drink raw milk “for the health,” don’t you.

[Anonymous]

I'm sure I'm repeating someone here but I've been using 1/2 butter, 1/2 shortening in my tollhouse cookies for as long as I can remember. Makes the cookies buttery yet softer than all butter.

My mom makes the world's best pie crust using corn or vegetable oil as the base.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, you guys are so precious about your butter. Excellent bakers know when butter is the ingredient and when shortening is better, due to water and solids content, not to mention how it act with the other ingredients

This, which is why it's ridiculous to see all these people who don't bake acting like butter is the expensive, high end ingredient. It's comical. I have shortbread cookies I make with olive oil (and rosemary and chocolate), and since you can really taste the olive oil, I use the expensive stuff I buy from the specialty Italian store instead of the giant bottle of California olive oil I buy at the grocery store. But there are lots of other recipes I make using vegetable oil or shortening because they give a better texture. Many recipes work better with shortening because it is more stable during cooking. Still other recipes, I will melt the butter before incorporating into the batter, rather than creaming with the sugar. For pastry, I sometimes use shortening because of the challenges of working butter into a dough when my kitchen is hot. Shortening doesn't get hard like butter when it's cold, but it also doesn't melt when it's warm, making it an easier option if I'm making pie crusts in July or at the same time as I'm baking something in the oven at 500 degrees making my kitchen run hot. I like having options.

It's such a DCUM thing to be like "ew Crisco, don't poor people use that? it must be bad." It's ignorant and elitist, and therefore perfectly on brand.

1. Sometimes shortening is the correct ingredient for a recipe/ climate / technique - but 99/100 that is not true for chocolate chip cookies
2. Some of us who grew up in working class or poor households saw our moms and grandmothers bake almost exclusively with shortening or margarine - and it was purely about cost and shelf stability - not some superior knowledge of pastry technique.
3. If you really bake a lot, you would know how butter has more than doubled in price over the last 6-8 months. So currently it is a “high end” ingredient. High enough that a less experienced baker may swap butter Crisco or margarine for a recipe developed for butter.

Your superior baking snobbery is also very on brand DCUM ridiculousness.

1. The point is not that shortening is the "right" ingredient for cookies, it's that it's common for bakers to use shortening (and not consider some kind of disgusting low class option), which means that someone might sub it in if they were low on butter without being cheap. It might simply be what she had on hand. No one is saying that good bakers ONLY use shortening, only that people who bake a lot wouldn't turn their noses up at it, and might be willing to use it in a pinch. It's insane for OP to call someone (who baked them a free cookie!) cheap because she might have used shortening in a recipe.

2. I grew up in a working class household that used shortening and margarine. And then when I was in high school, my dad started a business that took off and my parents are now very well off. My mom, who bakes a ton and is excellent at it, doesn't buy margarine anymore and is picky about the butter she buys. But she still always has a big thing of Crisco in the cabinet because it's a useful baking ingredient. It's also not actually that cheap! She would not normally use it in chocolate chip cookies, but I could see her supplementing with it if she was baking a big batch for my dad's work and ran low on butter. It might change the flavor of the cookies but she's not cheap, she's practical and knows how to bake.

3. I do in fact bake a lot and butter has increased in price but if you know where to shop, it's not necessarily twice the price. Also, since I bake a lot, I buy butter in bulk and will watch Harris Teeter for BOGO 1/2 off on butter and buy several pounds at once. I also know for certain that the very high end butters like Kerry Gold do not improve the flavor of baked goods and in some ways can interfere with a well-balanced recipe. I prefer using Land'o'lakes unsalted which I think has the best texture and flavor for baking. I am frugal but not cheap.

The difference between my baking snobbery and yours is that mine is based on real knowledge and yours is based on classist assumptions.

I mostly agree- but shortening is low class baking. It just is. You can get perfectly flakey pie crust crust, biscuits, and anything else you need with butter. So why would you put some cheap fake hydrogenated oil in stuff you are making for your family/friends?

The recipes on the King Arthur site disagree. Their classic pie crust calls for half butter/ half shortening-which is a common method for trying to split the difference between flavor and texture.

I did a test and made 3 different batches of pie crusts for the holidays. The best was the half butter, half shortening. Next was the all shortening. It was the flakiest and the lightest. My kids prefered it. The least favorite was the all butter. There are websites that do the same thing I did and explain the differences.

I always think posters like op are projecting their own traits. Op tell us you're cheap without telling us you're cheap. So tacky to complain about a snack someone provides you for free and you went back for more than one. Did you file a complaint with HR?

Agree to disagree. Even pie crust with crisco tastes like unflavored oily garbage, but yes it sure is flakey!

+1. These low class folks sure get defensive when you don’t like the slop they serve.

[Anonymous]

My family only made cookies with shortening, I would not have known any better. And the recipes were handed down from the WW2 era, so there wasn't much butter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure I'm repeating someone here but I've been using 1/2 butter, 1/2 shortening in my tollhouse cookies for as long as I can remember. Makes the cookies buttery yet softer than all butter.

My mom makes the world's best pie crust using corn or vegetable oil as the base.

Same here - tollhouse recipe with half butter and half shortening. That’s how my mom always made them and what tastes best to me. It is not about cost at all, trust me I am flush enough to afford an all butter cookie (LOL). It is texture and structure.

OP maybe next time someone is nice enough to share a baked good with those at work who can’t be bothered to appreciate it like you - just say no thanks. It was kind of them to do so and not an invitation to post on a message board disparaging them with no knowledge whatsoever on the matter. You come out looking worse here than the cookies regardless of butter/shortening preferences.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does butter go bad/rancid? If someone is making 100 cookies, you need 10 or more sticks of butter, so it's not like you're grabbing a single stick buried in the back of your fridge, right? So that seems an unlikely culprit.

You don't grab the butter from the fridge when you make cookies. You're a baking idiot.

The butter needs to be the right temp to cream with the sugars. Most of us set the butter out the night before. If your kitchen is warm enough and you leave the butter out more than a day or so it can begin to get rancid.

Obviously this person doesn’t bake.
100 cookies needs maybe 4 sticks of butter for normal size cookies. The nestle recipe makes five dozen with two sticks, to give an idea.

If you are baking and talking about sticks of butter you do not know what you are doing. Baking is about precise measurements for consistent results. A stick of butter is 3 3/4 -3 7/8 oz not 4 oz. A cup of flour can vary in weight +/- 20%. This is why people who bake by volume get inconsistent results. Use a scale.

[Anonymous]

Cookies made with shortening? Gross. Might as well just eat the center of a Oreo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does butter go bad/rancid? If someone is making 100 cookies, you need 10 or more sticks of butter, so it's not like you're grabbing a single stick buried in the back of your fridge, right? So that seems an unlikely culprit.

You don't grab the butter from the fridge when you make cookies. You're a baking idiot.

The butter needs to be the right temp to cream with the sugars. Most of us set the butter out the night before. If your kitchen is warm enough and you leave the butter out more than a day or so it can begin to get rancid.

Obviously this person doesn’t bake.
100 cookies needs maybe 4 sticks of butter for normal size cookies. The nestle recipe makes five dozen with two sticks, to give an idea.

If you are baking and talking about sticks of butter you do not know what you are doing. Baking is about precise measurements for consistent results. A stick of butter is 3 3/4 -3 7/8 oz not 4 oz. A cup of flour can vary in weight +/- 20%. This is why people who bake by volume get inconsistent results. Use a scale.

oh stfu

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm sure I'm repeating someone here but I've been using 1/2 butter, 1/2 shortening in my tollhouse cookies for as long as I can remember. Makes the cookies buttery yet softer than all butter.

My mom makes the world's best pie crust using corn or vegetable oil as the base.

My siblings and I reminisce about these blondies that came from a mix full of shortening/powder. You only added water. They couldn't even turn brown. They stayed an anemic pale blonde. But so so good!

[Anonymous]

OP, I highly suggest you watch “The Menu” and see if you have the self-awareness to guess which character you are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL, you guys are so precious about your butter. Excellent bakers know when butter is the ingredient and when shortening is better, due to water and solids content, not to mention how it act with the other ingredients

This, which is why it's ridiculous to see all these people who don't bake acting like butter is the expensive, high end ingredient. It's comical. I have shortbread cookies I make with olive oil (and rosemary and chocolate), and since you can really taste the olive oil, I use the expensive stuff I buy from the specialty Italian store instead of the giant bottle of California olive oil I buy at the grocery store. But there are lots of other recipes I make using vegetable oil or shortening because they give a better texture. Many recipes work better with shortening because it is more stable during cooking. Still other recipes, I will melt the butter before incorporating into the batter, rather than creaming with the sugar. For pastry, I sometimes use shortening because of the challenges of working butter into a dough when my kitchen is hot. Shortening doesn't get hard like butter when it's cold, but it also doesn't melt when it's warm, making it an easier option if I'm making pie crusts in July or at the same time as I'm baking something in the oven at 500 degrees making my kitchen run hot. I like having options.

It's such a DCUM thing to be like "ew Crisco, don't poor people use that? it must be bad." It's ignorant and elitist, and therefore perfectly on brand.

1. Sometimes shortening is the correct ingredient for a recipe/ climate / technique - but 99/100 that is not true for chocolate chip cookies
2. Some of us who grew up in working class or poor households saw our moms and grandmothers bake almost exclusively with shortening or margarine - and it was purely about cost and shelf stability - not some superior knowledge of pastry technique.
3. If you really bake a lot, you would know how butter has more than doubled in price over the last 6-8 months. So currently it is a “high end” ingredient. High enough that a less experienced baker may swap butter Crisco or margarine for a recipe developed for butter.

Your superior baking snobbery is also very on brand DCUM ridiculousness.

1. The point is not that shortening is the "right" ingredient for cookies, it's that it's common for bakers to use shortening (and not consider some kind of disgusting low class option), which means that someone might sub it in if they were low on butter without being cheap. It might simply be what she had on hand. No one is saying that good bakers ONLY use shortening, only that people who bake a lot wouldn't turn their noses up at it, and might be willing to use it in a pinch. It's insane for OP to call someone (who baked them a free cookie!) cheap because she might have used shortening in a recipe.

2. I grew up in a working class household that used shortening and margarine. And then when I was in high school, my dad started a business that took off and my parents are now very well off. My mom, who bakes a ton and is excellent at it, doesn't buy margarine anymore and is picky about the butter she buys. But she still always has a big thing of Crisco in the cabinet because it's a useful baking ingredient. It's also not actually that cheap! She would not normally use it in chocolate chip cookies, but I could see her supplementing with it if she was baking a big batch for my dad's work and ran low on butter. It might change the flavor of the cookies but she's not cheap, she's practical and knows how to bake.

3. I do in fact bake a lot and butter has increased in price but if you know where to shop, it's not necessarily twice the price. Also, since I bake a lot, I buy butter in bulk and will watch Harris Teeter for BOGO 1/2 off on butter and buy several pounds at once. I also know for certain that the very high end butters like Kerry Gold do not improve the flavor of baked goods and in some ways can interfere with a well-balanced recipe. I prefer using Land'o'lakes unsalted which I think has the best texture and flavor for baking. I am frugal but not cheap.

The difference between my baking snobbery and yours is that mine is based on real knowledge and yours is based on classist assumptions.

I mostly agree- but shortening is low class baking. It just is. You can get perfectly flakey pie crust crust, biscuits, and anything else you need with butter. So why would you put some cheap fake hydrogenated oil in stuff you are making for your family/friends?

The recipes on the King Arthur site disagree. Their classic pie crust calls for half butter/ half shortening-which is a common method for trying to split the difference between flavor and texture.

I did a test and made 3 different batches of pie crusts for the holidays. The best was the half butter, half shortening. Next was the all shortening. It was the flakiest and the lightest. My kids prefered it. The least favorite was the all butter. There are websites that do the same thing I did and explain the differences.

I always think posters like op are projecting their own traits. Op tell us you're cheap without telling us you're cheap. So tacky to complain about a snack someone provides you for free and you went back for more than one. Did you file a complaint with HR?

Agree to disagree. Even pie crust with crisco tastes like unflavored oily garbage, but yes it sure is flakey!

+1. These low class folks sure get defensive when you don’t like the slop they serve.

Also why I hate most grocery store and high volume bakery cookies, cakes, pies. They all rely on shortening for both the baked goods and the “buttercream” frosting. Really is gross. The only acceptable use of shortening is a freshly made cider donut at the apple orchard.

[Anonymous]

*UPDATE*

We have confirmed she used a soy-based butter-flavored shortening!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does butter go bad/rancid? If someone is making 100 cookies, you need 10 or more sticks of butter, so it's not like you're grabbing a single stick buried in the back of your fridge, right? So that seems an unlikely culprit.

You don't grab the butter from the fridge when you make cookies. You're a baking idiot.

The butter needs to be the right temp to cream with the sugars. Most of us set the butter out the night before. If your kitchen is warm enough and you leave the butter out more than a day or so it can begin to get rancid.

Obviously this person doesn’t bake.
100 cookies needs maybe 4 sticks of butter for normal size cookies. The nestle recipe makes five dozen with two sticks, to give an idea.

If you are baking and talking about sticks of butter you do not know what you are doing. Baking is about precise measurements for consistent results. A stick of butter is 3 3/4 -3 7/8 oz not 4 oz. A cup of flour can vary in weight +/- 20%. This is why people who bake by volume get inconsistent results. Use a scale.

+100 this is why sometimes your cookies run off the pan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:*UPDATE*

We have confirmed she used a soy-based butter-flavored shortening!

It’s the soy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*UPDATE*

We have confirmed she used a soy-based butter-flavored shortening!

It’s the soy.

I’m guessing it’s Crisco butter flavored shortening. The first ingredient is soy oil, followed by palm oil. Pure junk.