There’s a disparity in number of applicants at some, but a disparity in quality of enrolled students based on gender is very unlikely and would be news to me. Diminishing returns after a point. |
Too late. I already ordered my lucky troll dolls. Welp, there's always bingo night. |
|
There is a big difference between making the decisions, and an adcom saying "I trust this guy, he says this is the kid we want". Recommendations from trusted sources are the most powerful thing in employment decisions, why would it be any different in admissions? |
Explain this to me. If you have 8000 more female applicants than male applicants and the schools aim to have evenly split classes, how is it not an advantage to be a male applicant when the percentage of acceptances is necessarily higher? |
| full pay! |
Again that was not a reach situation |
The top 3 LACs (and a bit beyond beyond) are a reach for everyone and reject plenty of kids with stats like that. They are also need blind so full pay has no effect. |
+1000 |
It's the OP that references full pay as a "help." The enrollment managers and admin staff know who is full pay. Don't be naive. |
|
My kid got a letter from AO at school with < 3.5% acceptance rate. Apparently it was their character, achievements and potential. That’s all I “know.”
My best guess — character was from a service project, LOR and essays; achievements was national/international awards in competitions. Potential was probably LOR and essays. FWIW, my kid cannot write essays that read like novels, but they wrote about how they see themselves contributing at the intersection of their interests — something that will be important to all of us in the years to come. And their story was certainly unique. |
Was agreeing with the statement that the top 3 LAC's etc are a reach for everyone. |
You're a conspiracy theorist? Can you provide some evidence for your entirely unsubstantiated claim? The FACT is that need blind colleges are ABSOLUTELY NEED BLIND IN ADMISSIONS, and they can be because the vast majority of top applicants are affluent. The don't consider FA and they don't have to. So being full pay is absolutely no benefit over the other candidates. There has never been one iota of evidence otherwise. |
My guess would be the essay. |
| Match stats, great character, ROTC female at a a school where very few kids go ROTC |