| How many dates with someone would you go on to determine if the person had potential for something long-term? This is assuming all of the dates just went ok |
| OK but something there that gives me hope? 3. Just ok dates, probably 1-2 |
|
Why were they just “ok”?
if the chemistry isn’t there then you’ll have to work toward it. Or, just throw in the towel and say it’s not going to work. |
| 4 dates if you really get on, but don't get it on with him until you think he's has long term potential |
| You really need more than "ok" at the start, if it's going to last for the long haul. Sorry. |
Agreed, 1 or 2 for “ok dates”. More than that and you’re saying you will settle for “ok” in a relationship. |
+1 |
| I’d say three, but don’t sleep with them. |
Depends on the culture and expectations. “Ok” without the lows and the highs works for millions of people for hundreds of years. |
| 2 |
|
3 seems to be the cap.
|
| For those saying 3, just curious how much ground you cover in those three dates? |
Don’t beat this to death. If you spend 2 or 3 dates with someone you know if there’s potential or not. Especially if there’s not. |
| Yeah, if she hasn’t wowed me in two dates, not much point in continuing. |
| OP here. We’ve been on 3 dates. The conversation is fine. He’d like to go out again. Nothing physical has happened. In the past I’ve called it a wrap after two dates. I’m newly dating again at middle age and have been surprised at how crappy the dating market is at this stage. Makes me wonder if I should keep dating someone as long as there are no red flags. |