Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

Ha, there’s a post on Reddit noting deauxmoi seems to be following a playbook similar to what we see on here. Long blathering, twisting and turning, trying to spin this as Blake is winning. The latest is attempting to show freedman is ‘struggling’ in court, implying Baldoni is on the ropes. Similar to the poster here who obsessed over the protective order being such a loss for Freedman (as if this is his personal case). Who is now obsessed with noting venable hasn’t moved to rescind their motion to quash. Their motion was weak and it set up freedman’s letter perfectly. That along with TSs harsh PR statement and total silence on Fresdmans allegations makes clear where Blake stands.

Someone needs to give her some decent advice and tell her to quit before this gets worse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Right on cue. Accusing others of doing the same thing they were accused of. And the accompanying buddy post agreeing. The most fascinating!

Yep, the pair is at it again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

Ha, there’s a post on Reddit noting deauxmoi seems to be following a playbook similar to what we see on here. Long blathering, twisting and turning, trying to spin this as Blake is winning. The latest is attempting to show freedman is ‘struggling’ in court, implying Baldoni is on the ropes. Similar to the poster here who obsessed over the protective order being such a loss for Freedman (as if this is his personal case). Who is now obsessed with noting venable hasn’t moved to rescind their motion to quash. Their motion was weak and it set up freedman’s letter perfectly. That along with TSs harsh PR statement and total silence on Fresdmans allegations makes clear where Blake stands.

Someone needs to give her some decent advice and tell her to quit before this gets worse

The wordy spam is to be pump and juke analytics they’re billing the two birdbrains for. It’s hilarious to know this worthless nonsense is costing them big bucks.

[Anonymous]

Alex Saks was not the producer bought in after 17-point list. It's someone named Todd Black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Far more than 3 :)

[Anonymous]

Multiple people on previous productions have come out to express that Blake Lively is awful on set. No one has come forward to allege that Justin has ever sexually harassed them. This is the issue I find with people who are insistent that even they're both well-intentioned people, Justin was the one who lit the fuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

Ha, there’s a post on Reddit noting deauxmoi seems to be following a playbook similar to what we see on here. Long blathering, twisting and turning, trying to spin this as Blake is winning. The latest is attempting to show freedman is ‘struggling’ in court, implying Baldoni is on the ropes. Similar to the poster here who obsessed over the protective order being such a loss for Freedman (as if this is his personal case). Who is now obsessed with noting venable hasn’t moved to rescind their motion to quash. Their motion was weak and it set up freedman’s letter perfectly. That along with TSs harsh PR statement and total silence on Fresdmans allegations makes clear where Blake stands.

Someone needs to give her some decent advice and tell her to quit before this gets worse

The wordy spam is to be pump and juke analytics they’re billing the two birdbrains for. It’s hilarious to know this worthless nonsense is costing them big bucks.

Interesting. This all makes sense

[Anonymous]

For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

Legal, but the movie-making aspects of it are fun. Less the celeb angle than thinking about these legal issues within the context of Hollywood and film making -- it's more interesting to look at a workplace conflict that happened in a creative workplace with creative people than if this were, say, a paper company. But I'd be interested in the legal aspects even if it were a paper company.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Funny you’re the one who brings that post up again and again, even though it was pages and pages ago. Almost like it was one of your posts to try to make pro Baldoni posters look ‘crazy’ etc which you like to do whenever things are particularly rough for Blake…

Have you no shame? Ironic that Blake started this whole thing bc she thought she had been ‘smeared’ on social media and yet here you are day after day doing your own smearing and twisting.

Wouldn’t it be hilarious if DCUM was subpoenaed and freedman unmasked YOUR campaign on here? Lolz /s/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Far more than 3 :)

Sure just like Free Diddy protestors

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

Legal, but the movie-making aspects of it are fun. Less the celeb angle than thinking about these legal issues within the context of Hollywood and film making -- it's more interesting to look at a workplace conflict that happened in a creative workplace with creative people than if this were, say, a paper company. But I'd be interested in the legal aspects even if it were a paper company.

You don’t think this is just a Blake pr person doing research? Trying to figure out the best angle to try to shut down the chatter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Right?! And religiously responding to almost every post that takes a pro-Lively side. Like, lady, you can take a snack break or walk the dog sometimes. The comments won’t expire! At least this person mostly stopped announcing her various comings and goings, like “went out to dinner and came back to this!. lol. Karen, we don’t need your minute-by-minute updates on your whereabouts, we are not your family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Lively poster(s) is fascinating. I cannot believe anyone is so invested they write paragraph upon paragraph multiple times attempting to change the narrative. Originally kept responding misogyny was the reason anyone wouldn't support Lively. Then became obsessed with the birth scene. Then it was showing the home birth video. Ew ew ew. Got called out as a bot or pr and proceeded to call Baldoni posters bots. Baldoni was a deviant serial harraser. That didn't take so even if it was a misunderstanding he still ran a terrible set and he should've played ball and appeased Lively's demands. He is weak and ineffectual but enough of a bully to harass Blake and other actresses. My favorite was the "good-faith" attempt to meet other posters in person. Who would actually say yes to that?

You are confusing multiple people, but yes, let’s just look at the thousands of posts that three Baldoni supporters have written here making crazier claims than that about Lively and insisting, for example, that some Lively supporter was tracking their location through comments here somehow. Even more fascinating!

Is it three? I'm convinced it's one, maybe two. The tone is exactly the same in every single post.

Far more than 3 :)

Sure just like Free Diddy protestors

Right right bc Baldoni is like Diddy, huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you posting a lot - do you care more about the celeb aspect of this case or the legal aspects?

Legal, but the movie-making aspects of it are fun. Less the celeb angle than thinking about these legal issues within the context of Hollywood and film making -- it's more interesting to look at a workplace conflict that happened in a creative workplace with creative people than if this were, say, a paper company. But I'd be interested in the legal aspects even if it were a paper company.

+1