paywall - Washington Spirit owner Steve Baldwin issues email to team investors: ‘I can no longer rem

[Anonymous]

Could you please help out on the content? Thanks!


https://theathletic.com/3095397/2022/01/26/washington-spirit-owner-steve-baldwin-issues-email-to-team-investors-i-can-no-longer-remain-silent/

[Anonymous]

Baldwin paints this as a "coup attempt," portrays Kang as an anti-gay, corrupt businessperson who should not have been consorting with players, blames her for the covid forfeits, and admits the problems are partly personal. He also says she paid off Burke to badmouth Baldwin.

Kinda makes him look unhinged.

[Anonymous]

This article doesn't require a paywall--summarizes the content:
https://www.sportico.com/business/sales/2022/washington-spirit-sale-steve-baldwin-letter-michele-kang-1234659270/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This article doesn't require a paywall--summarizes the content:
https://www.sportico.com/business/sales/2022/washington-spirit-sale-steve-baldwin-letter-michele-kang-1234659270/

Also behind a paywall.

(And rightly so, I might add. Content doesn't drop from the sky for free.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article doesn't require a paywall--summarizes the content:
https://www.sportico.com/business/sales/2022/washington-spirit-sale-steve-baldwin-letter-michele-kang-1234659270/

Also behind a paywall.

(And rightly so, I might add. Content doesn't drop from the sky for free.)

Content which is worth nothing should be free. And content which is worth less than nothing (i.e. benefits the publisher more than the reader) should also be free. Much of the content we are exposed to today falls into one of those categories.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This article doesn't require a paywall--summarizes the content:
https://www.sportico.com/business/sales/2022/washington-spirit-sale-steve-baldwin-letter-michele-kang-1234659270/

Also behind a paywall.

(And rightly so, I might add. Content doesn't drop from the sky for free.)

Content which is worth nothing should be free. And content which is worth less than nothing (i.e. benefits the publisher more than the reader) should also be free. Much of the content we are exposed to today falls into one of those categories.

He would have been better making a statement on social media in a video

[Anonymous]

Baldwin is a Chauvinistic pig!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Baldwin is a Chauvinistic pig!

Is that what the article said or your own personal opinion?