Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

About time his death was investigated. Will the guard paid $5,000 decide that was enough to lie under oath?

I thought she got multiple payments in the months leading up to the death? Or, maybe it was another guard.

Regardless of $5k or $20k, she’ll blow through that in lawyer costs for a hearing, loss of privacy, and safety issues.

That money was given to her in 2019 and is long gone,whatever the amount. She will be lucky if she doesn't end up in prison.

[Anonymous]

👀

[Anonymous]

Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

FBI has been full on participating in the cover up. Connect the dots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

FBI has been full on participating in the cover up. Connect the dots.

Good point, we are going to need quite the overhaul.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

What a joke. An uber-wealthy investment banking lawyer, with no experience as a prosecutor and who was Chairman of Apollo Mgmt, as head of SDNY.

He was one of Trump's first picks when Trump was re-elected:
https://emptywheel.net/2024/11/28/the-little-noticed-jay-clatyon-pick-at-sdny/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

FBI has been full on participating in the cover up. Connect the dots.

Good point, we are going to need quite the overhaul.

I think Trump could fire more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

Okay, but then how does it change things for you? Are you more angry? How or why? Should it be handled differently in some way?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

Okay, but then how does it change things for you? Are you more angry? How or why? Should it be handled differently in some way?

Angrier, because there are even more people to add to the roster of depraved, evil men and more layers of manipulation and abuse.

But I don't really understand this question. What other answer is possible?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Curious to know how people would respond to this question:

If there were concrete evidence that Epstein had been m an intelligence asset or even agent, how would this change things for you?

Would you be more or less angry? How and why?

This is already basically confirmed. No one even takes the time to refute it anymore. Which is why we need to have access to all the files and then the FBI needs to investigate and prosecute all these people.

Okay, but then how does it change things for you? Are you more angry? How or why? Should it be handled differently in some way?

Angrier, because there are even more people to add to the roster of depraved, evil men and more layers of manipulation and abuse.

But I don't really understand this question. What other answer is possible?

* noting that Ghislaine and a couple other women also belong on that roster of depraved, evil men.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

These pics are circulating again. The more we know, the more they are disturbing.