Roy Moore the Pedophile

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now we just cancel elections?

Alabama state law gives the governor broad authority to set the date of special elections, NYT reports Gov. Kay Ivey may order a new date for the election—sometime early next year—giving Republicans time to ease Roy Moore from the race.

What happens when people mail in the absentee ballots that have already gone out?

Republicans don’t lose sleep over disenfranchisement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate it that these people kept silent this long.
What changed just now?

Republicans don’t want this cretin in the senate. He’s too much trouble and can’t be contained.

The women, Bozo. What changed for them just now?

The people with the most to lose from a Roy Moore win made it easier for the women to come forward. Bozo.

Anyone remember when Hermain Cain was the front runner in GOP primaries?

[Anonymous]

Never thought I’d express Agreement with Mitt, but he’s right. Innocent until proven guilty is the standard for a criminal proceeding, not an election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:To be fair to Moore, the 14 year old was unusually tall, probably looked closer to 16-18 when he did it. And the age of consent in Alabama is 16. And the dating pool is/was quite shallow as most women in the 70s in Alabama were married by their late teens. My grandmother was married at 17, the week after she graduated from high school.

Facts don't matter to liberals. Put a bunch of teens in a lineup and I guarantee you that most liberal men would guess their age incorrectly. Furthermore, these idiots are deliberately 'forgetting' that almost 40 years has gone by and that it was a southern state where women did marry quite early. My very liberal MIL was pregnant with her first at 19, and that was in Ohio, never mind AL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d express Agreement with Mitt, but he’s right. Innocent until proven guilty is the standard for a criminal proceeding, not an election.

Appalling. Truly. Innocent until proven guilty is a foundation of this country, one of our most fundamental rights. Without that premise, anyone can accuse someone of anything for any reason, and it could be life-changing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair to Moore, the 14 year old was unusually tall, probably looked closer to 16-18 when he did it. And the age of consent in Alabama is 16. And the dating pool is/was quite shallow as most women in the 70s in Alabama were married by their late teens. My grandmother was married at 17, the week after she graduated from high school.

Facts don't matter to liberals. Put a bunch of teens in a lineup and I guarantee you that most liberal men would guess their age incorrectly. Furthermore, these idiots are deliberately 'forgetting' that almost 40 years has gone by and that it was a southern state where women did marry quite early. My very liberal MIL was pregnant with her first at 19, and that was in Ohio, never mind AL.

Why would a mother, at the courthouse for a hearing, need someone to watch a 19 year old? Especially if way back in the olden times in the south a 19 year old was practically an old maid? Something fishy about that story. Oh maybe it's because her daughter was actually 14 and still looked on as a minor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair to Moore, the 14 year old was unusually tall, probably looked closer to 16-18 when he did it. And the age of consent in Alabama is 16. And the dating pool is/was quite shallow as most women in the 70s in Alabama were married by their late teens. My grandmother was married at 17, the week after she graduated from high school.

Facts don't matter to liberals. Put a bunch of teens in a lineup and I guarantee you that most liberal men would guess their age incorrectly. Furthermore, these idiots are deliberately 'forgetting' that almost 40 years has gone by and that it was a southern state where women did marry quite early. My very liberal MIL was pregnant with her first at 19, and that was in Ohio, never mind AL.

Most conservative men too, but what difference does that make? She was 14 at the time, he was a grown, professional man. As someone about the same age as her, both at the time and today, I know that if a 32 year old approached me and did the things he is purported to do, I would have known it was wrong, illegal and truly gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d express Agreement with Mitt, but he’s right. Innocent until proven guilty is the standard for a criminal proceeding, not an election.

Appalling. Truly. Innocent until proven guilty is a foundation of this country, one of our most fundamental rights. Without that premise, anyone can accuse someone of anything for any reason, and it could be life-changing.

And if Moore ever goes to trial for his underage encounters, he will have the assumption of 'innocent til proven guilty.' But that doesn't mean Alabamans should elect him as their standard bearer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that no one who supposedly knew about this never reported a thing.

Why wait until 30 days before a heated election?
That's not even enough time for an investigation.

Something fishy about that.

Dude he admitted to everything except the 14 year old saying that he always got permission from the teenagers moms before dating them.

He admitted to knowing at least two of them. He won't say it didn't happen just, "I don't recall" and "I dated a lot of young women"

Exactly. So what's going on here is liberals don't like that an older man dated women of legal dating age, and asked their mothers for permission? 38 years ago? How many men in Hollywood are married to much younger women? It doesn't matter if you think it's skeevy, even for 38 years ago. What matter is if it's LEGAL. Timeframe and location matter, as do norms sat the time of the alleged 'crime'.

Is there any concrete proof, aside from 'word of mouth' that Moore knew the 14 year old was actually 14, not 16? And didn't he ask her mother as well? And if so, why did they not say "she's only 14?" and if they said they did, where is the concrete proof of that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate it that these people kept silent this long.
What changed just now?

There’s a tectonic shift following the Weinstein revelations. Victims finally feel empowered enough to challenge abusive men in positions of authority and power. The now see the pattern of abuse. They’re not doing it alone.

And it's also the perfect opportunity to use those revelations as a means to destroy those you want out of the way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that no one who supposedly knew about this never reported a thing.

Why wait until 30 days before a heated election?
That's not even enough time for an investigation.

Something fishy about that.

Dude he admitted to everything except the 14 year old saying that he always got permission from the teenagers moms before dating them.

He admitted to knowing at least two of them. He won't say it didn't happen just, "I don't recall" and "I dated a lot of young women"

Exactly. So what's going on here is liberals don't like that an older man dated women of legal dating age, and asked their mothers for permission? 38 years ago? How many men in Hollywood are married to much younger women? It doesn't matter if you think it's skeevy, even for 38 years ago. What matter is if it's LEGAL. Timeframe and location matter, as do norms sat the time of the alleged 'crime'.

Is there any concrete proof, aside from 'word of mouth' that Moore knew the 14 year old was actually 14, not 16? And didn't he ask her mother as well? And if so, why did they not say "she's only 14?" and if they said they did, where is the concrete proof of that?

You are justifying the actions of a pedophile. You are a sick, sick person.

[Anonymous]

The state of Alabama is on the verge of embracing Apocolyptic Christianity.

Truly amazing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To be fair to Moore, the 14 year old was unusually tall, probably looked closer to 16-18 when he did it. And the age of consent in Alabama is 16. And the dating pool is/was quite shallow as most women in the 70s in Alabama were married by their late teens. My grandmother was married at 17, the week after she graduated from high school.

Facts don't matter to liberals. Put a bunch of teens in a lineup and I guarantee you that most liberal men would guess their age incorrectly. Furthermore, these idiots are deliberately 'forgetting' that almost 40 years has gone by and that it was a southern state where women did marry quite early. My very liberal MIL was pregnant with her first at 19, and that was in Ohio, never mind AL.

Why would a mother, at the courthouse for a hearing, need someone to watch a 19 year old? Especially if way back in the olden times in the south a 19 year old was practically an old maid? Something fishy about that story. Oh maybe it's because her daughter was actually 14 and still looked on as a minor.

I said my MIL was 19. This girl could easily be mistaken for 16. You know that, and that's why you are shifting the goalposts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate it that these people kept silent this long.
What changed just now?

There’s a tectonic shift following the Weinstein revelations. Victims finally feel empowered enough to challenge abusive men in positions of authority and power. The now see the pattern of abuse. They’re not doing it alone.

And it's also the perfect opportunity to use those revelations as a means to destroy those you want out of the way.

So people in Hollywood (HOLLYWOOD!!!) take the accusations and it immediately ends careers and businesses, but when the same comes forward with GOP, it's circle the wagons.

So Hollywood has more moral fiber than the GOP.

Wow

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We know that no one who supposedly knew about this never reported a thing.

Why wait until 30 days before a heated election?
That's not even enough time for an investigation.

Something fishy about that.

Dude he admitted to everything except the 14 year old saying that he always got permission from the teenagers moms before dating them.

He admitted to knowing at least two of them. He won't say it didn't happen just, "I don't recall" and "I dated a lot of young women"

Exactly. So what's going on here is liberals don't like that an older man dated women of legal dating age, and asked their mothers for permission? 38 years ago? How many men in Hollywood are married to much younger women? It doesn't matter if you think it's skeevy, even for 38 years ago. What matter is if it's LEGAL. Timeframe and location matter, as do norms sat the time of the alleged 'crime'.

Is there any concrete proof, aside from 'word of mouth' that Moore knew the 14 year old was actually 14, not 16? And didn't he ask her mother as well? And if so, why did they not say "she's only 14?" and if they said they did, where is the concrete proof of that?

You are justifying the actions of a pedophile. You are a sick, sick person.

Are you accusing a man of pedophilia without due process?