Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regarding Natasha's voice: yeah, I always found it annoying too.

I learned about Peter and Natasha in 2006 when the show started in DC. Listened to the Kane Show for years and years but finally stopped listening to them once I realized Danni and John were getting on my nerves way too much. For me, John was too sophomoric and Danni was too defensive (text the show anything and they won't respond, text a comment about Danni that is even neutral and you'll get her personally attacking you in seconds). I'm sure it worked for some but it wasn't for me. I went on to try STM and as someone else has commented, they were just so bland and stuck on the past (subtle jabs at the Kane Show here and there) that they just didn't hold my interest. I too miss the chemistry of the old days: Kane, Sarah, and Sammy--though I would take Erick too.

I followed Natasha's blog throughout the years as well. Mostly because her daughters are so darn cute that I just love to see them in their sweet outfits. Her topics were also interesting at times but it always bothered me that she couldn't correctly use its/it's, their/there, were/we're, to/too, etc. Overall, from what I heard on the radio and saw on the blog posts, my general impression was that Peter wasn't a big spender--he's an Old Navy guy--and she is--frequent designer brands for many things, decorating and redecorating the same spaces, elaborate birthday parties, having her 4 and 6 year old have their hair dyed for the summer at a salon. Sure, the home was both of theirs and so are the girls but those things were definitely not Peter's ideas nor would many men think them up. Though it seemed to give Peter some anxiety that Natasha spent money all the time, it seemed like he was in love with her/committed enough to deal with it to some extent. Even with the many car accidents Natasha had, and there were many throughout all the years, not just recently, he always cared about her safety first and the repair costs later. The recent house purchase seemed to me like a Natasha driven thing. They had a 4 bedroom, 3.5 bathroom home beforehand with two daughters and repeated mention of no more children desired. Then they bought an 8 bedroom, 8 bathroom home for double the price of their old home while actually getting LESS on their old home than what they originally bought it for AND getting her a new car very shortly after AND even with her brand new home she blogged about renovation projects (unnecessary ones, like repainting and redesigning the mudroom).

To me, she always came off selfish and he came off as a workaholic. In the end, those things probably just got amplified or at least the perception of them did. I don't think anything new really happened for her to leave, I think she just couldn't take more of the things that annoyed her about him. In turn, I think he just finally gave into the fact that it wasn't going to work after she left the way she did--it was just another reminder of who she truly is and how that isn't a good match for someone with his personality. They didn't seem like a great fit to begin with, but I did think they would make it work for longer than it has been. His OCD and ADHD diagnoses and her fibromyalgia diagnosis, meh, they were just icing on the cake, in my opinion, because those symptoms had been going on for both prior to the diagnoses.

I would say that is a pretty accurate assessment.

She's a big fat snob, according to people from her old neighborhood. I know where she used to live. Have know idea why she wanted "more". No matter, eventually she's going to have a lot less.

[Anonymous]

PSA: Kane changed his twitter bio--used to mention that he was a 'husband and father'; now just says 'Dedicated Father'.

Hers still says 'wife'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regarding Natasha's voice: yeah, I always found it annoying too.

I learned about Peter and Natasha in 2006 when the show started in DC. Listened to the Kane Show for years and years but finally stopped listening to them once I realized Danni and John were getting on my nerves way too much. For me, John was too sophomoric and Danni was too defensive (text the show anything and they won't respond, text a comment about Danni that is even neutral and you'll get her personally attacking you in seconds). I'm sure it worked for some but it wasn't for me. I went on to try STM and as someone else has commented, they were just so bland and stuck on the past (subtle jabs at the Kane Show here and there) that they just didn't hold my interest. I too miss the chemistry of the old days: Kane, Sarah, and Sammy--though I would take Erick too.

I followed Natasha's blog throughout the years as well. Mostly because her daughters are so darn cute that I just love to see them in their sweet outfits. Her topics were also interesting at times but it always bothered me that she couldn't correctly use its/it's, their/there, were/we're, to/too, etc. Overall, from what I heard on the radio and saw on the blog posts, my general impression was that Peter wasn't a big spender--he's an Old Navy guy--and she is--frequent designer brands for many things, decorating and redecorating the same spaces, elaborate birthday parties, having her 4 and 6 year old have their hair dyed for the summer at a salon. Sure, the home was both of theirs and so are the girls but those things were definitely not Peter's ideas nor would many men think them up. Though it seemed to give Peter some anxiety that Natasha spent money all the time, it seemed like he was in love with her/committed enough to deal with it to some extent. Even with the many car accidents Natasha had, and there were many throughout all the years, not just recently, he always cared about her safety first and the repair costs later. The recent house purchase seemed to me like a Natasha driven thing. They had a 4 bedroom, 3.5 bathroom home beforehand with two daughters and repeated mention of no more children desired. Then they bought an 8 bedroom, 8 bathroom home for double the price of their old home while actually getting LESS on their old home than what they originally bought it for AND getting her a new car very shortly after AND even with her brand new home she blogged about renovation projects (unnecessary ones, like repainting and redesigning the mudroom).

To me, she always came off selfish and he came off as a workaholic. In the end, those things probably just got amplified or at least the perception of them did. I don't think anything new really happened for her to leave, I think she just couldn't take more of the things that annoyed her about him. In turn, I think he just finally gave into the fact that it wasn't going to work after she left the way she did--it was just another reminder of who she truly is and how that isn't a good match for someone with his personality. They didn't seem like a great fit to begin with, but I did think they would make it work for longer than it has been. His OCD and ADHD diagnoses and her fibromyalgia diagnosis, meh, they were just icing on the cake, in my opinion, because those symptoms had been going on for both prior to the diagnoses.

I would say that is a pretty accurate assessment.

She's a big fat snob, according to people from her old neighborhood. I know where she used to live. Have know idea why she wanted "more". No matter, eventually she's going to have a lot less.

did she come from money? family members seem a little.........not so much. and they were in kentlands right?

[Anonymous]

I'm punching out at all this it's too upsetting. Please google "parasocial interactions" and ask yourselves while you're behaving this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regarding Natasha's voice: yeah, I always found it annoying too.

I learned about Peter and Natasha in 2006 when the show started in DC. Listened to the Kane Show for years and years but finally stopped listening to them once I realized Danni and John were getting on my nerves way too much. For me, John was too sophomoric and Danni was too defensive (text the show anything and they won't respond, text a comment about Danni that is even neutral and you'll get her personally attacking you in seconds). I'm sure it worked for some but it wasn't for me. I went on to try STM and as someone else has commented, they were just so bland and stuck on the past (subtle jabs at the Kane Show here and there) that they just didn't hold my interest. I too miss the chemistry of the old days: Kane, Sarah, and Sammy--though I would take Erick too.

I followed Natasha's blog throughout the years as well. Mostly because her daughters are so darn cute that I just love to see them in their sweet outfits. Her topics were also interesting at times but it always bothered me that she couldn't correctly use its/it's, their/there, were/we're, to/too, etc. Overall, from what I heard on the radio and saw on the blog posts, my general impression was that Peter wasn't a big spender--he's an Old Navy guy--and she is--frequent designer brands for many things, decorating and redecorating the same spaces, elaborate birthday parties, having her 4 and 6 year old have their hair dyed for the summer at a salon. Sure, the home was both of theirs and so are the girls but those things were definitely not Peter's ideas nor would many men think them up. Though it seemed to give Peter some anxiety that Natasha spent money all the time, it seemed like he was in love with her/committed enough to deal with it to some extent. Even with the many car accidents Natasha had, and there were many throughout all the years, not just recently, he always cared about her safety first and the repair costs later. The recent house purchase seemed to me like a Natasha driven thing. They had a 4 bedroom, 3.5 bathroom home beforehand with two daughters and repeated mention of no more children desired. Then they bought an 8 bedroom, 8 bathroom home for double the price of their old home while actually getting LESS on their old home than what they originally bought it for AND getting her a new car very shortly after AND even with her brand new home she blogged about renovation projects (unnecessary ones, like repainting and redesigning the mudroom).

To me, she always came off selfish and he came off as a workaholic. In the end, those things probably just got amplified or at least the perception of them did. I don't think anything new really happened for her to leave, I think she just couldn't take more of the things that annoyed her about him. In turn, I think he just finally gave into the fact that it wasn't going to work after she left the way she did--it was just another reminder of who she truly is and how that isn't a good match for someone with his personality. They didn't seem like a great fit to begin with, but I did think they would make it work for longer than it has been. His OCD and ADHD diagnoses and her fibromyalgia diagnosis, meh, they were just icing on the cake, in my opinion, because those symptoms had been going on for both prior to the diagnoses.

I would say that is a pretty accurate assessment.

She's a big fat snob, according to people from her old neighborhood. I know where she used to live. Have no idea why she wanted "more". No matter, eventually she's going to have a lot less.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can't say I know how I'd act because I've never been in the situation, but I found it very odd that Kane said after he came home to the empty house, he went to sleep. He then said he was concerned someone had taken his family. If you came home to an empty house with an empty safe and you had concerns about the well being of your family, wouldn't you do something besides just go to sleep?[/quote]

I found that odd at first too, but later he said that when he got up the next morning and the alerts were going off from the bank that's when he opened the safe. I think he was flustered talking about it and said that part too soon. I think he came home to an empty house, thought it was odd but that they were probably out, and went to bed. Then when he woke up and they were still not home he got worried, then the phone alerts, then the safes empty.

I also think he had started to realize what she was really capable of and most people would panic if that stuff was gone but sounds like he knew they weren't really kidnapped, he didn't call the police, he called his mom. He knew she screwed him.[/quote]

I also found it odd at first, but if you think about it - he said he initially thought his family had been kidnapped, but then when he saw the pictures taken out of the picture frames, it hit him that she was gone. TBH, he probably just shut down. His brain went, "Nope, can't deal with this devastation right now." It was probably more to protect his sanity than anything else. Idk about the rest of you, but if I went out thinking everything was hunky dory and then came home to realize that my spouse of 8 years (they were together longer before they got married though, so let's say 10+) took *everything* from me, including my children and my pets, after everything I'd done to try to support them...I'd be in such total shock that I'd lose it. I would probably just slump to the floor in the spot where I stood and cry myself to sleep. He was probably so overwhelmed by the realization that he just couldn't think to do anything else but go to sleep (probably more like pass out from the shock) and avoid the nightmare. It's not real while you aren't conscious.[/quote]

Perfect example of a Kane apologist. I mean, you just created an entire scenario based on your own fantasy, but people are trying to pretend the actual facts don't exist. She never left on May 2 or May 3. [/quote]

Except for the fact that Sam is in school and she would have had to come back for Sam to finish the school year. No way does a student leave school the first weekend of May and then skip a month and a half of school without the school doing something OR without Sam being enrolled somewhere else, which I highly doubt she did that late in the year.

Who's to say that she didn't come back to DC and just not let him see the kids? And, if she was gone for part of May, June, and then most of July (since it's the end of the month), then I'm sure that's why he said "three months." I'm not saying that nothing was exaggerated- but her lawyers would be ALLLLLL over it if he didn't tell the truth, even if it was a stretch.
[/quote]

EXACTLY, she was NOT GONE FOR THREE MONTHS. That's the point! OMG, am I talking to a wall?? plus, Her lawyers WERE all over it, which is why is was wiped clean from any replays. If it was sooo true, he would stand by his 30 minute dialogue and not erase it. I love how people suddenly are pretending like lawyers are the epitome of truth. Is this real life? LMAO[/quote].


Hey, great post. completely agree. But there are so many ignorant people on here, don't even bother explaining to them. To add to your theory, he had natasha on his radio show i think 3 times in the month of may about 2 weeks after she supposedly left. If i were her, I will sue kane, the radio show for slander.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can't say I know how I'd act because I've never been in the situation, but I found it very odd that Kane said after he came home to the empty house, he went to sleep. He then said he was concerned someone had taken his family. If you came home to an empty house with an empty safe and you had concerns about the well being of your family, wouldn't you do something besides just go to sleep?[/quote]

I found that odd at first too, but later he said that when he got up the next morning and the alerts were going off from the bank that's when he opened the safe. I think he was flustered talking about it and said that part too soon. I think he came home to an empty house, thought it was odd but that they were probably out, and went to bed. Then when he woke up and they were still not home he got worried, then the phone alerts, then the safes empty.

I also think he had started to realize what she was really capable of and most people would panic if that stuff was gone but sounds like he knew they weren't really kidnapped, he didn't call the police, he called his mom. He knew she screwed him.[/quote]

I also found it odd at first, but if you think about it - he said he initially thought his family had been kidnapped, but then when he saw the pictures taken out of the picture frames, it hit him that she was gone. TBH, he probably just shut down. His brain went, "Nope, can't deal with this devastation right now." It was probably more to protect his sanity than anything else. Idk about the rest of you, but if I went out thinking everything was hunky dory and then came home to realize that my spouse of 8 years (they were together longer before they got married though, so let's say 10+) took *everything* from me, including my children and my pets, after everything I'd done to try to support them...I'd be in such total shock that I'd lose it. I would probably just slump to the floor in the spot where I stood and cry myself to sleep. He was probably so overwhelmed by the realization that he just couldn't think to do anything else but go to sleep (probably more like pass out from the shock) and avoid the nightmare. It's not real while you aren't conscious.[/quote]

Perfect example of a Kane apologist. I mean, you just created an entire scenario based on your own fantasy, but people are trying to pretend the actual facts don't exist. She never left on May 2 or May 3. [/quote]

Except for the fact that Sam is in school and she would have had to come back for Sam to finish the school year. No way does a student leave school the first weekend of May and then skip a month and a half of school without the school doing something OR without Sam being enrolled somewhere else, which I highly doubt she did that late in the year.

Who's to say that she didn't come back to DC and just not let him see the kids? And, if she was gone for part of May, June, and then most of July (since it's the end of the month), then I'm sure that's why he said "three months." I'm not saying that nothing was exaggerated- but her lawyers would be ALLLLLL over it if he didn't tell the truth, even if it was a stretch.
[/quote]

EXACTLY, she was NOT GONE FOR THREE MONTHS. That's the point! OMG, am I talking to a wall?? plus, Her lawyers WERE all over it, which is why is was wiped clean from any replays. If it was sooo true, he would stand by his 30 minute dialogue and not erase it. I love how people suddenly are pretending like lawyers are the epitome of truth. Is this real life? LMAO[/quote].


Hey, great post. completely agree. But there are so many ignorant people on here, don't even bother explaining to them. To add to your theory, he had natasha on his radio show i think 3 times in the month of may about 2 weeks after she supposedly left. If i were her, I will sue kane, the radio show for slander.[/quote]

the crazy is back i think

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can't say I know how I'd act because I've never been in the situation, but I found it very odd that Kane said after he came home to the empty house, he went to sleep. He then said he was concerned someone had taken his family. If you came home to an empty house with an empty safe and you had concerns about the well being of your family, wouldn't you do something besides just go to sleep?[/quote]

I found that odd at first too, but later he said that when he got up the next morning and the alerts were going off from the bank that's when he opened the safe. I think he was flustered talking about it and said that part too soon. I think he came home to an empty house, thought it was odd but that they were probably out, and went to bed. Then when he woke up and they were still not home he got worried, then the phone alerts, then the safes empty.

I also think he had started to realize what she was really capable of and most people would panic if that stuff was gone but sounds like he knew they weren't really kidnapped, he didn't call the police, he called his mom. He knew she screwed him.[/quote]

I also found it odd at first, but if you think about it - he said he initially thought his family had been kidnapped, but then when he saw the pictures taken out of the picture frames, it hit him that she was gone. TBH, he probably just shut down. His brain went, "Nope, can't deal with this devastation right now." It was probably more to protect his sanity than anything else. Idk about the rest of you, but if I went out thinking everything was hunky dory and then came home to realize that my spouse of 8 years (they were together longer before they got married though, so let's say 10+) took *everything* from me, including my children and my pets, after everything I'd done to try to support them...I'd be in such total shock that I'd lose it. I would probably just slump to the floor in the spot where I stood and cry myself to sleep. He was probably so overwhelmed by the realization that he just couldn't think to do anything else but go to sleep (probably more like pass out from the shock) and avoid the nightmare. It's not real while you aren't conscious.[/quote]

Perfect example of a Kane apologist. I mean, you just created an entire scenario based on your own fantasy, but people are trying to pretend the actual facts don't exist. She never left on May 2 or May 3. [/quote]

Except for the fact that Sam is in school and she would have had to come back for Sam to finish the school year. No way does a student leave school the first weekend of May and then skip a month and a half of school without the school doing something OR without Sam being enrolled somewhere else, which I highly doubt she did that late in the year.

Who's to say that she didn't come back to DC and just not let him see the kids? And, if she was gone for part of May, June, and then most of July (since it's the end of the month), then I'm sure that's why he said "three months." I'm not saying that nothing was exaggerated- but her lawyers would be ALLLLLL over it if he didn't tell the truth, even if it was a stretch.
[/quote]

EXACTLY, she was NOT GONE FOR THREE MONTHS. That's the point! OMG, am I talking to a wall?? plus, Her lawyers WERE all over it, which is why is was wiped clean from any replays. If it was sooo true, he would stand by his 30 minute dialogue and not erase it. I love how people suddenly are pretending like lawyers are the epitome of truth. Is this real life? LMAO[/quote].


Hey, great post. completely agree. But there are so many ignorant people on here, don't even bother explaining to them. To add to your theory, he had natasha on his radio show i think 3 times in the month of may about 2 weeks after she supposedly left. If i were her, I will sue kane, the radio show for slander.[/quote]Lol!! Nice try. Tell N to start looking for a job. I hope she is more intelligent than she sounds!!

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous]PSA: Kane changed his twitter bio--used to mention that he was a 'husband and father'; now just says 'Dedicated Father'.

Hers still says 'wife'.[/quote]



If she weren't such a gold digger she'd still be "his wife".

[Anonymous]

No she did not come from money. He said they were paying her grandmother's utility bills and insurance! They did enjoy a lavish vacation on his dime though!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No she did not come from money. He said they were paying her grandmother's utility bills and insurance! They did enjoy a lavish vacation on his dime though!

That's the last lavish vacation she'll be taking her family on. She needs to find another sugar daddy. Good luck to that.

[Anonymous]

lol you ignorant people are funny. please take some time and educate yourself before you post. Kane is a liar, lies about roses, scam, fake lies that he doesn't know certain things. he had his wife on 5/15 to talk about his proposal to her, next time on air was sex challenge, even says i love you to her. And you fools still believe him? But then his show is filled with dumb fluffy stuff, just sex and introducing his family for a 100th time. no wonder his listeners r mostly :/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:lol you ignorant people are funny. please take some time and educate yourself before you post. Kane is a liar, lies about roses, scam, fake lies that he doesn't know certain things. he had his wife on 5/15 to talk about his proposal to her, next time on air was sex challenge, even says i love you to her. And you fools still believe him? But then his show is filled with dumb fluffy stuff, just sex and introducing his family for a 100th time. no wonder his listeners r mostly :/

Good thing the person with such a fine mastery of the English language is the one calling everyone else ignorant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol you ignorant people are funny. please take some time and educate yourself before you post. Kane is a liar, lies about roses, scam, fake lies that he doesn't know certain things. he had his wife on 5/15 to talk about his proposal to her, next time on air was sex challenge, even says i love you to her. And you fools still believe him? But then his show is filled with dumb fluffy stuff, just sex and introducing his family for a 100th time. no wonder his listeners r mostly :/

Good thing the person with such a fine mastery of the English language is the one calling everyone else ignorant.

It's probably N. Which means she is as dumb as she sounds.

[Anonymous]

ok professor. like i said ignorant people. Just here to point out other people's faults instead of looking up details (the whole point of my original post). I did not realize this was a grammar forum. Guess I have to dot my I's and Q's to get people to look further than the surface.