|
My son did not get in Pool.
Cause he got cogAT scores 129, 131, 131 But his Composite(VQN) is 135 and Age stanine is 9 and Age percentile Rank is 99% If we referral to AAP how much he has a chance to be an eligible?? Thanks! |
| You should parent refer. Scores just one aspect. Can't say if chance of bring eligible. |
| Doesn't the 135 composite put him in the pool? |
| Composite does not do it. 132 onNnat or any of the CoGAT subscores..... |
| He has good scores and well rounded. What were nnat? |
| We have similar results - ds had just turned 8 (October birthday - exactly when tests started. Ds is being compared to redshirted 8 going on 9 year olds. This was not the case with NNAT since the report clearly displayed his age in years and months. |
| Assume he was not in pool b/c his NNAT score was low? |
| What is the highest score possible for CogAT? |
| Maybe AAP wouldn't be a good fit? |
I disagree. This child is well rounded. AAP could be a good fit. |
| 23:11- you are wrong. Results were age normed. Only lass year's results weren't. |
Plus, the SAS is aged norm, so the age of the child should not come into play with the results. A younger child can get more incorrect than an older child. The 99% age score must be for composite of 135, because the 129,131,131 would not be 99%. Also the local percents would be lower. I do also think this is a child that should be parent referred, especially if there is other evidence at home or in the classroom of needing AAP services. |
| You'd very likely get in with those scores if parent referred. They are consistently high across the board. |
My son's NNT was 126 And he was born in end of June that is why his age composite and percentile is high.. I think.. |
| His composite is high because he is constantly high. |