Oliva Wilde and Jason Sudeikis divorce

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised at her income. And that the CS amount isn’t equal between the two kids.

https://people.com/olivia-wilde-jason-sudeikis-settle-custody-battle-child-support-7974329

She only made 500K? I'm surprised too.

[Anonymous]

Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

Who knows. Maybe she takes private lessons. Maybe she has a learning disability and is in a more expensive school. Impossible to speculate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised at her income. And that the CS amount isn’t equal between the two kids.

https://people.com/olivia-wilde-jason-sudeikis-settle-custody-battle-child-support-7974329

She only made 500K? I'm surprised too.

Probably 500k for directing. Google says her net worth is 10 million vs Jason’s of 20 million. Neither needs money from the other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised at her income. And that the CS amount isn’t equal between the two kids.

https://people.com/olivia-wilde-jason-sudeikis-settle-custody-battle-child-support-7974329

She only made 500K? I'm surprised too.

Probably 500k for directing. Google says her net worth is 10 million vs Jason’s of 20 million. Neither needs money from the other.

I agree, but Olivia made out like a bandit. She’s getting about half what Christine Costner is getting and Jason has a tiny fraction of Kevin’s net worth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

Doubtful. Jason is paying 25% of Olivia’s childcare costs over and above the child support.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

Doubtful. Jason is paying 25% of Olivia’s childcare costs over and above the child support.

Irks 50/50, one week on one off, why is paying any support?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

Doubtful. Jason is paying 25% of Olivia’s childcare costs over and above the child support.

Irks 50/50, one week on one off, why is paying any support?

Because the support is for the kids, not the parent. The idea is that if one parent can afford a home with bedrooms for all the kids, and the other parent cannot, the wealthier parent can be asked to subsidize a larger home for their ex so that the children can have similar experiences both places. Because it's about the kids, not the parents.

A more basic concern might be food -- if one parent can afford very high quality food for the kids and the other parent cannot, then this might be factored into a support award to ensure the child can eat the same high quality food in both homes.

Child support is not a payment to a parent in exchange for taking care of their own kids. It's a payment on behalf of the child to ensure the child has access to the same benefits of the higher-earning spouse's money as they would if their parents were still married.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

Doubtful. Jason is paying 25% of Olivia’s childcare costs over and above the child support.

Irks 50/50, one week on one off, why is paying any support?

Because the support is for the kids, not the parent. The idea is that if one parent can afford a home with bedrooms for all the kids, and the other parent cannot, the wealthier parent can be asked to subsidize a larger home for their ex so that the children can have similar experiences both places. Because it's about the kids, not the parents.

A more basic concern might be food -- if one parent can afford very high quality food for the kids and the other parent cannot, then this might be factored into a support award to ensure the child can eat the same high quality food in both homes.

Child support is not a payment to a parent in exchange for taking care of their own kids. It's a payment on behalf of the child to ensure the child has access to the same benefits of the higher-earning spouse's money as they would if their parents were still married.

Both are worth millions and no the support is not for the other parent to give an equal home. If that were the case Costner’s wife would be getting a lot more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised at her income. And that the CS amount isn’t equal between the two kids.

https://people.com/olivia-wilde-jason-sudeikis-settle-custody-battle-child-support-7974329

She only made 500K? I'm surprised too.

Probably 500k for directing. Google says her net worth is 10 million vs Jason’s of 20 million. Neither needs money from the other.

Olivia has been unemployed since DWD finished filming. She literally devoted all her time and energy following Harry Styles around the world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised at her income. And that the CS amount isn’t equal between the two kids.

https://people.com/olivia-wilde-jason-sudeikis-settle-custody-battle-child-support-7974329

She only made 500K? I'm surprised too.

Probably 500k for directing. Google says her net worth is 10 million vs Jason’s of 20 million. Neither needs money from the other.

+1 if she has 10 million, he shouldn’t have to pay her anything. There should be a limit. It’s ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was surprised at her income. And that the CS amount isn’t equal between the two kids.

https://people.com/olivia-wilde-jason-sudeikis-settle-custody-battle-child-support-7974329

She only made 500K? I'm surprised too.

Probably 500k for directing. Google says her net worth is 10 million vs Jason’s of 20 million. Neither needs money from the other.

+1 if she has 10 million, he shouldn’t have to pay her anything. There should be a limit. It’s ridiculous.

Agreed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

Doubtful. Jason is paying 25% of Olivia’s childcare costs over and above the child support.

Irks 50/50, one week on one off, why is paying any support?

Because the support is for the kids, not the parent. The idea is that if one parent can afford a home with bedrooms for all the kids, and the other parent cannot, the wealthier parent can be asked to subsidize a larger home for their ex so that the children can have similar experiences both places. Because it's about the kids, not the parents.

A more basic concern might be food -- if one parent can afford very high quality food for the kids and the other parent cannot, then this might be factored into a support award to ensure the child can eat the same high quality food in both homes.

Child support is not a payment to a parent in exchange for taking care of their own kids. It's a payment on behalf of the child to ensure the child has access to the same benefits of the higher-earning spouse's money as they would if their parents were still married.

Both are worth millions and no the support is not for the other parent to give an equal home. If that were the case Costner’s wife would be getting a lot more.

She signed a prenup though agreeing to way less.

Also Jason Sudeikis and Olivia Wilde were never married.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why $7,000 more in child support for the 7 yr old girl than the 9 yr old boy, do you think?

I'm betting it has to do with childcare. The amount is too large to be much else because even if there is a special needs accommodation, it's unlikely to amount to 7k a month. But probably the 7 yr old requires more hours from a nanny.

I don't think it could be differences in school tuition or the cost of activities because those things would usually be sorted out separately from a child support award -- likely Sudeikis is simply paying their school tuitions and other expenses associated with their education because he's the much higher earner. The support award is meant to just even things out in terms of things like their homes (so kids aren't going from dad's mansion with a pool to mom's 2 bedroom condo) or food or clothes. Also vacations and other enriching activities. Most of which wouldn't be child specific. But childcare would be and likely.

I'm aware most of us wouldn't have a nanny just for our 7 yr old but very wealthy people absolutely do stuff like that and they are extremely well paid.

Doubtful. Jason is paying 25% of Olivia’s childcare costs over and above the child support.

Irks 50/50, one week on one off, why is paying any support?

Because the support is for the kids, not the parent. The idea is that if one parent can afford a home with bedrooms for all the kids, and the other parent cannot, the wealthier parent can be asked to subsidize a larger home for their ex so that the children can have similar experiences both places. Because it's about the kids, not the parents.

A more basic concern might be food -- if one parent can afford very high quality food for the kids and the other parent cannot, then this might be factored into a support award to ensure the child can eat the same high quality food in both homes.

Child support is not a payment to a parent in exchange for taking care of their own kids. It's a payment on behalf of the child to ensure the child has access to the same benefits of the higher-earning spouse's money as they would if their parents were still married.

Both are worth millions and no the support is not for the other parent to give an equal home. If that were the case Costner’s wife would be getting a lot more.

She signed a prenup though agreeing to way less.

Also Jason Sudeikis and Olivia Wilde were never married.

Child support has nothing to do with a prenup. Costner was initially paying for the ex's housing, all of the child's expenses, and 5 figure monthly child support, but the ex continued to petition for more money until it backfired.

Jason and Olivia's kids are younger, and they live in cities rather than on a giant complex, so they probably carry the added expenses of full time nanny, security, and private transportation.